After Bruno's session ending at 1:10pm
Maybe we can find each other and others around 1:30pm?

On December 19, 2017 8:08:52 AM GMT+01:00, bruno vianna <bruno@pobox.com> wrote:

great idea Nico
 I'll be there.

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Nicolás Echániz <nicoechaniz@altermundi.net> wrote:

Hi all,

Many of us are in Geneva for the IGF. I propose that we meet at lunch
time today (tuesday 19) in the food area; we can then choose to move
somewhere else or stay there.


I've been talking with a number of ISOC people regarding an issue that
they brought up regarding our Bylaws.
It's not acceptable for ISOC to close the membership of a SIG by any
specific criteria.

So the compromise that I proposed and was accepted is that we let anyone
join the SIG but only community network members can be part of the
Council, which is where we will actually discuss strategy and take
decisions.
ISOC people was fine with this, so I have drafted that change in the pad:
https://pad.codigosur.org/CNSIG_Bylaws2


Panos: regarding your proposal for another standing comitee, It was
clearer for me in your e-mail than in what you wrote in the pad... maybe
we can rephrase it to make it easier to understand exactly what the area
of work this comitee will have.


See you tomorrow and those that are not here please raise your still
outstanding questions or doubts.

If we can close the Bylaws in the following 2 days, we can have the SIG
approved and maybe do some announcement in the IGF.



Cheers!
Nico

On 12/17/2017 04:08 PM, panayotis antoniadis wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It is a great honor to be in this group. Thanks for the invitation!
>
> The Bylaws are very nicely drafted.
>
> I did only some minor edits and added a suggestion regarding the
> Standing Committees
> related to my main interest being here, which is the local dimension of
> CNs, the
> participation of the overall community in governance and design of local
> services, beyond affordable Internet access.
>
> (I will be in Geneva from tomorrow afternoon and until Wednesday
> evening, so hopefully
> there will be the chance to discuss more in person)
>
> Best,
>
> Panayotis (Panos) Antoniadis
> http://nethood.org/panayotis/
>
> Quick readings:
> https://theconversation.com/diy-networking-the-path-to-a-more-democratic-internet-67216
> https://theconversation.com/how-to-build-a-more-organic-internet-and-stand-up-to-corporations-70815
>
>
>
> On 17.12.2017 19:39, Nicolás Echániz wrote:
>> On 12/17/2017 09:07 AM, novaes@riseup.net wrote:
>>> Hi Nico, dear colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for compiling this version: it seems almost ready!
>>>
>>> I have a question about line 87: "Re-election will be allowed
>>> indefinitely". What is the purpose of such a permition?
>>>
>>> In contrast, I think re-election should be avoided, not allowed.
>>> As an emergent group we should encourage everyone to take part and share
>>> responsabilities. Re-election (as evident in our "democracies") creates
>>> groups of power, specialists in maintaining their own power, status,
>>> privileges.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Yes Thiago, completely agree.
>> Changed to the same conditions as the Executive Council officers: three
>> consecutive (1 year) terms maximum.
>>
>> abrazo,
>> Nico
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CNSIG mailing list
>> CNSIG@listas.altermundi.net
>> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cnsig
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CNSIG mailing list
> CNSIG@listas.altermundi.net
> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cnsig
>

_______________________________________________
CNSIG mailing list
CNSIG@listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cnsig

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

_______________________________________________
CNSIG mailing list
CNSIG@listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cnsig