Dear all,
Thank you very much for the terms you suggested, and for your expressions of interest to provide definitions of several terms. We have put together a decent number of them, 63 terms to be precise, and 14 contributors.
However, we are currently short of contributors for about 20 terms, so in order to have a complete list we would kindly ask each of you by 15 May (our original deadline) to pick between one and two additional terms that have not yet been taken (those highlighted in green in the shared doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYVd8DiICKJ9ltBaGPp_PACRWaRK3cEgfsbG-9C…>). There are a couple of situations where we have suggested that two terms should be defined by the same person as they are closely related, for example the definition of self- and co-regulation.
Where more than one contributor exists for a specific term, we would welcome a collaboration between those contributors at the drafting stage, so as to make it easier to integrate each other’s input in the definition. In practice, it would be ideal if those contributors could come up with a joint definition, hoping this is fine for you.
Please let us know any questions or suggestions. We’ll get back to you with the final list by the end of the week.
All the best,
Luca and Nicolo
From: "LB(a)lucabelli.net" <LB(a)lucabelli.net>
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2020 at 10:51
To: Richard Wingfield <richard(a)gp-digital.org>, "cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net" <cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Cc: Nicolo Zingales <nicolo.zingales(a)fgv.br>
Subject: RE: Re: [CPR] Platform Regulations Glossary for IGF 2020
Dear Richard,
Thank you for your interest and for sharing these thoughtful comments.
Both points relate to an intrinsic limitation of this exercise: it will be extremely hard to make a comprehensive and detailed glossary, especially considering the limited time and resources that people are likely to be able to put into this commitment in these hectic times.
We can try to assuage those concerns by:
(1) making sure the list of terms features some of the most pressing and debated issues in the debate over platform law and policy. It is probably a good choice not to get into the definition of specific types of illegal content, as that would be heavily dependent on the jurisdiction in question, but it may be a remiss not to attempt a definition of the policy issues that are used to claim/justify some form of platform responsibility beyond what the applicable law requires. So, in this sense, defining disinformation, trolling and “inauthentic coordinated behaviour” (a concept that Facebook uses to prevent coordinated forms of “misuse” of their service in violation of community standards) would appear more useful than defining terms like hate speech, defamation, violent extremism, terrorism, bullying, revenge pornography.
(2) in the definitions, recognizing as much as possible the existence of competing/alternative views on the topic, possibly also providing links to sources where those views are more fully explained. While our goal is definitely to be schematic and clear, as you suggest, I’d like to think that this group can add value by referencing some of the cases/official documents of public authorities that address those concepts in more detail. In other words, we do not have to entirely sacrifice nuance for the sake of clarity and simplicity, if we can add links/references. Perhaps one challenge there is how to maintain as much as possible an impartial and objective perspective while also recognizing the diversity of approaches, but I don’t think the two are irreconcilable if we maintain a sufficiently abstract and high-level approach. After all, it is not uncommon for glossaries to have more than one entry for each concept, right?
Happy to discuss this more in detail, either in the list or within the group of people who volunteered to participate. We’ll circulate an email to those people shortly with more information about our next steps.
All the best,
Nicolo and Luca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info | www.cpdp.lat | www.internet-governance.fgv.br
t: @1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [CPR] Platform Regulations Glossary for IGF 2020
From: "Richard Wingfield" <richard(a)gp-digital.org>
Date: 4/14/20 6:18 am
To: "cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net" <cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Cc: "Luca Belli" <LB(a)lucabelli.net>
Dear all,
A huge thanks to Luca and Nicolo for getting the ball rolling on this. I think it's a really interesting and useful project and I look forward to being a part of it!
One question I do have is how we approach the idea of providing definitions of particular types of illegal/harmful content (at present, the list includes disinformation and hate speech, but I can see others are already making suggestions). While it may well be necessary to look at these through the Glossary, I can see a couple of challenges.
First, there are dozens of types of such illegal/harmful content (the list could easily also include defamation, bullying, violent extremism, terrorism, trolling, revenge pornography), all of which are concerning to policymakers. We'll need to think carefully over which ones we want to include as, conceptually, it might be hard to justify including some but not others.
Second, it's almost impossible to define some of these satisfactorily. Experts in the field haven't been able to reach agreement on a definition for hate speech, for example, and I'm not sure that even the brilliant minds within DCPR will be able to reach consensus. We may want to think about how we can help promote good, clear definitions of some of these terms, without necessarily suggesting that we have the perfect definitions
I'd be interested in others' thoughts on this, and how we can use the Glossary to help move the discussion forward among policymakers on these sensitive issues.
Richard
Richard Wingfield
Head of Legal | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
Second Home, 68 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
T: +44 (0)203 818 3258 | Skype: richard(a)gp-digital.org<mailto:richard@gp-digital.org>
gp-digital.org<http://gp-digital.org/>
FlowCrypt Public Key Fingerprint: 2F6F 9208 0F6E 17AD 8785 9903 E3BB 454E B7A2 690D
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 00:52, <LB(a)lucabelli.net<mailto:LB@lucabelli.net>> wrote:
Thanks for the useful comments Giovanni!
Hope you and your family are healthy and safe!
Best
Luca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info<http://www.cyberbrics.info> | www.cpdp.lat | www.internet-governance.fgv.br<http://www.internet-governance.fgv.br>
t: @1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [CPR] Platform Regulations Glossary for IGF 2020
From: "Giovanni De Gregorio" <g.degregorio(a)campus.unimib.it<mailto:g.degregorio@campus.unimib.it>>
Date: 4/9/20 5:48 am
To: "LB(a)lucabelli.net<mailto:LB@lucabelli.net>" <LB(a)lucabelli.net<mailto:LB@lucabelli.net>>
Cc: "cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:cpr@listas.altermundi.net>" <cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:cpr@listas.altermundi.net>>
Dear all,
happy to participate in this project. It sounds interesting and, I would say, useful.
I have already added some other key terms, especially focusing on online advertising.
Hope to meet you all in November. Please take care!
Best wishes
Giovanni
Il giorno mer 8 apr 2020 alle ore 21:34 <LB(a)lucabelli.net<mailto:LB@lucabelli.net>> ha scritto:
Dear all,
Hopefully this email finds you well and in good health in these troubled times. Its goal is to solicit your input into work to be developed as coalition 2020 output and the organisation of the annual IGF meeting.
As you might know, the IGF Secretariat recently issued its call for proposals for workshops and DC meetings for the next IGF, which should in principle (Coronavirus permitting) take place in Poland on 2-6 November. As one of the Dynamic Coalitions, we can reserve a slot by showing that we have been working on some form of output; therefore, we would like to hereby launch a process of implementation of the main suggestions made in our informal meeting at the 2019 IGF, i.e. to create a Glossary of key terms on platform law and policy, so as to provide a common language for academics, regulators and policy-makers when discussing issues of platform responsibility.
As usual, we rely on spontaneous contributions of members of this list, and thus we let the list of terms be shaped by your intuition of what is most useful. Here is a shared document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYVd8DiICKJ9ltBaGPp_PACRWaRK3cEgfsbG-9C…> where you can indicate terms for which you could provide a definition, in clear and objective terms. Some examples of key concepts are listed in the document, but please feel free to add more. Definitions could vary in length and focus (and the more nuance the better), but we would aim this to be a “living document” where we can bring together contributions from a range of disciplines and vocabularies. So, by all means, do not hesitate to put your name if you are inclined to provide a definition for a particular term in the list, even if someone else has already indicated their availability to do so. We will then help coordinate to ensure that the inputs from multiple contributors are complementary, rather than duplicating efforts.
At this point, we would like to simply receive your feedback as regards your interest in the development of the glossary and to participate in the DCPR session as a speaker (the former being a prerequisite for the latter). Our proposed plan (on which we welcome any feedback) is the following:
1) by 15 April: receive your expressions of interest for the development of the Glossary and participation to the session, so that we can submit a request for an IGF 2020 Session of the Coalition (the deadline is the 22of April)
2) by 15 May: consolidate your proposed terms and share a first drafts of the list of terms that will compose the Glossary, to which you can add further terms or express your feedback until the 30th of May.
3) by 30 June: those who have expressed interest regarding the elaboration of specific terms will add their proposed definitions (ideally between 100 and 1000 words) to the shared document
4) by 30 July: we will allow all coalition members to share further updates and/or add alternative definitions to the list of proposed definitions
5) by 30 August we will have a finalised version of the Glossary that we can proofread and send to our designer to print a booklet that will be circulated at the IGF with acknowledgment of contributors.
Any comments are very welcome!
Best regards
Luca and Nicolo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info<http://www.cyberbrics.info> | www.cpdp.lat | www.internet-governance.fgv.br<http://www.internet-governance.fgv.br>
t: @1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
_______________________________________________
CPR mailing list
CPR(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:CPR@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cpr
_______________________________________________
CPR mailing list
CPR(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:CPR@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/cpr
Hi everyone,
I hope you're all doing well. I want to share a really interesting podcast
series that the New York Times recently launched. It's called the Rabbit
Hole
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/17/podcasts/the-daily/rabbit-hole.html>,
and it explores – among other things – how the Internet has evolved, how
algorithms have developed, how individuals can be radicalised online, and
the role of platforms in all of this.
Stay safe and well, and have a good weekend,
-Michael
__________________
Michael J. Oghia | Advocacy & Engagement Manager
Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD <https://gfmd.info>)
Belgrade, Serbia | Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia>
Dear all,
Hopefully this email finds you well and in good health in these troubled times. Its goal is to solicit your input into work to be developed as coalition 2020 output and the organisation of the annual IGF meeting.
As you might know, the IGF Secretariat recently issued its call for proposals for workshops and DC meetings for the next IGF, which should in principle (Coronavirus permitting) take place in Poland on 2-6 November. As one of the Dynamic Coalitions, we can reserve a slot by showing that we have been working on some form of output; therefore, we would like to hereby launch a process of implementation of the main suggestions made in our informal meeting at the 2019 IGF, i.e. to create a Glossary of key terms on platform law and policy, so as to provide a common language for academics, regulators and policy-makers when discussing issues of platform responsibility.
As usual, we rely on spontaneous contributions of members of this list, and thus we let the list of terms be shaped by your intuition of what is most useful. Here is a shared document where you can indicate terms for which you could provide a definition, in clear and objective terms. Some examples of key concepts are listed in the document, but please feel free to add more. Definitions could vary in length and focus (and the more nuance the better), but we would aim this to be a “living document” where we can bring together contributions from a range of disciplines and vocabularies. So, by all means, do not hesitate to put your name if you are inclined to provide a definition for a particular term in the list, even if someone else has already indicated their availability to do so. We will then help coordinate to ensure that the inputs from multiple contributors are complementary, rather than duplicating efforts.
At this point, we would like to simply receive your feedback as regards your interest in the development of the glossary and to participate in the DCPR session as a speaker (the former being a prerequisite for the latter). Our proposed plan (on which we welcome any feedback) is the following:
1) by 15 April: receive your expressions of interest for the development of the Glossary and participation to the session, so that we can submit a request for an IGF 2020 Session of the Coalition (the deadline is the 22of April)
2) by 15 May: consolidate your proposed terms and share a first drafts of the list of terms that will compose the Glossary, to which you can add further terms or express your feedback until the 30th of May.
3) by 30 June: those who have expressed interest regarding the elaboration of specific terms will add their proposed definitions (ideally between 100 and 1000 words) to the shared document
4) by 30 July: we will allow all coalition members to share further updates and/or add alternative definitions to the list of proposed definitions
5) by 30 August we will have a finalised version of the Glossary that we can proofread and send to our designer to print a booklet that will be circulated at the IGF with acknowledgment of contributors.
Any comments are very welcome!
Best regards
Luca and Nicolo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info | www.cpdp.lat | www.internet-governance.fgv.br
t: @1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
Dear all,
Just a friendly reminder of our meeting later today at 16:00 outside Estrel Saal B. We will be discussing our research overlaps and opportunities for collaboration. If you know anyone who is at the IGF and would be good to involve in this (even though they are not a member of the CPR), please feel free to invite them.
See you soon!
Nicolo
From: <cpr-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Nicolo Zingales <N.Zingales(a)leeds.ac.uk>
Date: Sunday, 17 November 2019 at 19:50
To: "cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net" <cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Cc: Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>
Subject: [CPR] CPR session (27/11) and informal meeting (26/11)
Dear all,
As the Internet Governance Forum is approaching, this email is to coordinate with those who are going to be in attendance.
First, as you probably know, the CPR will hold its session<https://igf2019.sched.com/event/SU3d/dc-on-platform-responsibility> on 27 November from 15 to 16:30 in Estrel Saal B in Sonnenallee 225, 12057 Berlin, and you are warmly invited to participate. We’re delighted to have a panel representing views from a range of experts and stakeholders, promising a lively discussion. You will find more details at the bottom of this email. By way of stimulation of your punctuality at the session, please be informed that we will have 100 hard copies of the Computer Law & Security Review’s Special Issue on ‘Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance’ available on a first come, first served basis.
Second, as in previous years, we would like to arrange an informal meeting of CPR members and likeminded researchers to discuss ideas and opportunities for collaboration around platform responsibility. We think that the best moment of the conference to do that is during one of the introductory high-level sessions. Therefore, we’d like to invite you to join us to meet at 16h on 26 November (day 1 of the IGF) at the main entrance of the room where our session will take place (again, Estrel Saal B). If you think you will be able to make it, please let us know (offlist) so we can count you in and make sure to find a suitable location for the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you in Berlin!
Best wishes,
Nicolo and Luca
Long description of the session https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-platform-values-c…<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=eD1o8WM-fgCl7Vq78l3TYyXHjxGXWGBEZ7P…>
Below is a shorter description of the session and the Table of Contents of the SI.
Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance
This session will discuss three of the most crucial points of contention with regard to values underlying the operation of digital platforms: Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance.
The session will include presentations based on the papers featured in a Special Issue (SI) of the Computer Law & Security Review, celebrating five years of activities<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=FCNdGHWO68fl4isDhi9H3YDGGN4lO9zvXnP…> of the UN IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility and entitled 'Platform Value(s): Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance'.
The SI, which is the 2019 official outcome of the coalition, will include also the finalised Best Practices on Platforms' Implementation on the Right to Effective Remedy, produced by the Coalition between May 2018 and March 2019 (available here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=PnNFZct-YK-xUaPuiXftx-yLhvwKKEJeePH…>). The entire work will be released in open access starting 27 November 2019. In the meantime, you can read the editorial "Platform value(s): A multidimensional framework for online responsibility" here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=RvYWckPsI7o-ER1x7tMs5WL15HCp1QesegO….>.
The session will have the following agenda:
* · Opening remarks by Nicolo Zingales, University of Leeds, and Luca Belli, FGV
Part I- Platform Values, Freedom of Expression and Democracy
* · Keynote by Edison Lanza, Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Organization of American States
* · Nic Suzor, Queensland University of Technology
* · Monica Rosina, Facebook
Quick round of questions
Part II: Platform values and content moderation
* · Chris Marsden, University of Sussex
* · Ivar Hartmann, FGV
* · Giovanni De Gregorio, Univerista' Milano Bicocca
* · Dragana Obradovic, Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
Quick round of questions
Part III: Conflcting rights and values
* · Catherine Carnovale, Elsevier
* · Rolf H. Weber, University of Zurich
* · Catalina Goanta, Maastricht University
* · Yseult Marique, University of Essex
· Open Debate
Table of contents of the Special Issue
* Platform Value(s):A Multidimensional Framework for Online Responsibility
Luca Belli and Nicolo Zingales [Already available here]
Introductory Essays
* Governing Digital Societies: Private Platforms, Public Values
José van Dijck
* A Constitutional Moment: How We Might Reimagine Platform Governance
Nicolas Suzor
* From the Telegraph to Twitter: The Case for the Digital Platform Act
Harold Feld
Conflicting Rights
* The New City Regulators
Sofia Ranchordas and Catalina Goanta
* Sanctions on Digital Platforms: Balancing Proportionality in the Modern Public Square
Engerrand Marique and Yseult Marique
* A New Framework for Online Content Moderation
Ivar Hartmann
Artificial Intelligence
* Socio-Ethical Values and Legal Rules on Automated Platforms: The Quest for a Symbiotic Relationship
Rolf H. Weber
* Democratising Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework
Giovanni De Gregorio
* Platform Values and Democratic Elections: How Can the Law Regulate Digital Disinformation?
Chris Marsden, Trisha Meyer and Ian Brown
Tax Avoidance
* The Progressive Policy Shift in the Debate on the International Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy: A “Pretext” for Overhaul of the International Tax Regime?
Alessandro Turina
* E-commerce and Effective VAT/GST Enforcement: Can Online Platforms Play a Valuable Role?
Luisa Scarcella
Annex
* Best Practices Platforms’ Implementation of the Right to an Effective Remedy
Collectively elaborated by members of the IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility
Thank you to those who kindly noted that the links I shared in the previous email were corrupted, due to a technical glitch on Outlook. Apologies for the inconvenience. Below the correct links.
Reports of 5 years of activities<https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/dynamic-coalition-on-platf…>
Longer session description<https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-platform-values-c…>
SI Editorial on Platform Value(s)<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3488282>
All the best
Nicolo
From: <cpr-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Nicolo Zingales <N.Zingales(a)leeds.ac.uk>
Date: Sunday, 17 November 2019 at 18:50
To: "cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net" <cpr(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Cc: Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>
Subject: [CPR] CPR session (27/11) and informal meeting (26/11)
Dear all,
As the Internet Governance Forum is approaching, this email is to coordinate with those who are going to be in attendance.
First, as you probably know, the CPR will hold its session<https://igf2019.sched.com/event/SU3d/dc-on-platform-responsibility> on 27 November from 15 to 16:30 in Estrel Saal B in Sonnenallee 225, 12057 Berlin, and you are warmly invited to participate. We’re delighted to have a panel representing views from a range of experts and stakeholders, promising a lively discussion. You will find more details at the bottom of this email. By way of stimulation of your punctuality at the session, please be informed that we will have 100 hard copies of the Computer Law & Security Review’s Special Issue on ‘Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance’ available on a first come, first served basis.
Second, as in previous years, we would like to arrange an informal meeting of CPR members and likeminded researchers to discuss ideas and opportunities for collaboration around platform responsibility. We think that the best moment of the conference to do that is during one of the introductory high-level sessions. Therefore, we’d like to invite you to join us to meet at 16h on 26 November (day 1 of the IGF) at the main entrance of the room where our session will take place (again, Estrel Saal B). If you think you will be able to make it, please let us know (offlist) so we can count you in and make sure to find a suitable location for the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you in Berlin!
Best wishes,
Nicolo and Luca
Long description of the session https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-platform-values-c…<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=eD1o8WM-fgCl7Vq78l3TYyXHjxGXWGBEZ7P…>
Below is a shorter description of the session and the Table of Contents of the SI.
Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance
This session will discuss three of the most crucial points of contention with regard to values underlying the operation of digital platforms: Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance.
The session will include presentations based on the papers featured in a Special Issue (SI) of the Computer Law & Security Review, celebrating five years of activities<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=FCNdGHWO68fl4isDhi9H3YDGGN4lO9zvXnP…> of the UN IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility and entitled 'Platform Value(s): Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance'.
The SI, which is the 2019 official outcome of the coalition, will include also the finalised Best Practices on Platforms' Implementation on the Right to Effective Remedy, produced by the Coalition between May 2018 and March 2019 (available here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=PnNFZct-YK-xUaPuiXftx-yLhvwKKEJeePH…>). The entire work will be released in open access starting 27 November 2019. In the meantime, you can read the editorial "Platform value(s): A multidimensional framework for online responsibility" here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=RvYWckPsI7o-ER1x7tMs5WL15HCp1QesegO….>.
The session will have the following agenda:
* · Opening remarks by Nicolo Zingales, University of Leeds, and Luca Belli, FGV
Part I- Platform Values, Freedom of Expression and Democracy
* · Keynote by Edison Lanza, Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Organization of American States
* · Nic Suzor, Queensland University of Technology
* · Monica Rosina, Facebook
Quick round of questions
Part II: Platform values and content moderation
* · Chris Marsden, University of Sussex
* · Ivar Hartmann, FGV
* · Giovanni De Gregorio, Univerista' Milano Bicocca
* · Dragana Obradovic, Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
Quick round of questions
Part III: Conflcting rights and values
* · Catherine Carnovale, Elsevier
* · Rolf H. Weber, University of Zurich
* · Catalina Goanta, Maastricht University
* · Yseult Marique, University of Essex
· Open Debate
Table of contents of the Special Issue
* Platform Value(s):A Multidimensional Framework for Online Responsibility
Luca Belli and Nicolo Zingales [Already available here]
Introductory Essays
* Governing Digital Societies: Private Platforms, Public Values
José van Dijck
* A Constitutional Moment: How We Might Reimagine Platform Governance
Nicolas Suzor
* From the Telegraph to Twitter: The Case for the Digital Platform Act
Harold Feld
Conflicting Rights
* The New City Regulators
Sofia Ranchordas and Catalina Goanta
* Sanctions on Digital Platforms: Balancing Proportionality in the Modern Public Square
Engerrand Marique and Yseult Marique
* A New Framework for Online Content Moderation
Ivar Hartmann
Artificial Intelligence
* Socio-Ethical Values and Legal Rules on Automated Platforms: The Quest for a Symbiotic Relationship
Rolf H. Weber
* Democratising Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework
Giovanni De Gregorio
* Platform Values and Democratic Elections: How Can the Law Regulate Digital Disinformation?
Chris Marsden, Trisha Meyer and Ian Brown
Tax Avoidance
* The Progressive Policy Shift in the Debate on the International Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy: A “Pretext” for Overhaul of the International Tax Regime?
Alessandro Turina
* E-commerce and Effective VAT/GST Enforcement: Can Online Platforms Play a Valuable Role?
Luisa Scarcella
Annex
* Best Practices Platforms’ Implementation of the Right to an Effective Remedy
Collectively elaborated by members of the IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility
Dear all,
As the Internet Governance Forum is approaching, this email is to coordinate with those who are going to be in attendance.
First, as you probably know, the CPR will hold its session<https://igf2019.sched.com/event/SU3d/dc-on-platform-responsibility> on 27 November from 15 to 16:30 in Estrel Saal B in Sonnenallee 225, 12057 Berlin, and you are warmly invited to participate. We’re delighted to have a panel representing views from a range of experts and stakeholders, promising a lively discussion. You will find more details at the bottom of this email. By way of stimulation of your punctuality at the session, please be informed that we will have 100 hard copies of the Computer Law & Security Review’s Special Issue on ‘Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance’ available on a first come, first served basis.
Second, as in previous years, we would like to arrange an informal meeting of CPR members and likeminded researchers to discuss ideas and opportunities for collaboration around platform responsibility. We think that the best moment of the conference to do that is during one of the introductory high-level sessions. Therefore, we’d like to invite you to join us to meet at 16h on 26 November (day 1 of the IGF) at the main entrance of the room where our session will take place (again, Estrel Saal B). If you think you will be able to make it, please let us know (offlist) so we can count you in and make sure to find a suitable location for the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you in Berlin!
Best wishes,
Nicolo and Luca
Long description of the session https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-platform-values-c…<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=eD1o8WM-fgCl7Vq78l3TYyXHjxGXWGBEZ7P…>
Below is a shorter description of the session and the Table of Contents of the SI.
Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance
This session will discuss three of the most crucial points of contention with regard to values underlying the operation of digital platforms: Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance.
The session will include presentations based on the papers featured in a Special Issue (SI) of the Computer Law & Security Review, celebrating five years of activities<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=FCNdGHWO68fl4isDhi9H3YDGGN4lO9zvXnP…> of the UN IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility and entitled 'Platform Value(s): Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance'.
The SI, which is the 2019 official outcome of the coalition, will include also the finalised Best Practices on Platforms' Implementation on the Right to Effective Remedy, produced by the Coalition between May 2018 and March 2019 (available here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=PnNFZct-YK-xUaPuiXftx-yLhvwKKEJeePH…>). The entire work will be released in open access starting 27 November 2019. In the meantime, you can read the editorial "Platform value(s): A multidimensional framework for online responsibility" here<https://webmail.fgv.br/owa/redir.aspx?C=RvYWckPsI7o-ER1x7tMs5WL15HCp1QesegO….>.
The session will have the following agenda:
* · Opening remarks by Nicolo Zingales, University of Leeds, and Luca Belli, FGV
Part I- Platform Values, Freedom of Expression and Democracy
* · Keynote by Edison Lanza, Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Organization of American States
* · Nic Suzor, Queensland University of Technology
* · Monica Rosina, Facebook
Quick round of questions
Part II: Platform values and content moderation
* · Chris Marsden, University of Sussex
* · Ivar Hartmann, FGV
* · Giovanni De Gregorio, Univerista' Milano Bicocca
* · Dragana Obradovic, Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
Quick round of questions
Part III: Conflcting rights and values
* · Catherine Carnovale, Elsevier
* · Rolf H. Weber, University of Zurich
* · Catalina Goanta, Maastricht University
* · Yseult Marique, University of Essex
· Open Debate
Table of contents of the Special Issue
* Platform Value(s):A Multidimensional Framework for Online Responsibility
Luca Belli and Nicolo Zingales [Already available here]
Introductory Essays
* Governing Digital Societies: Private Platforms, Public Values
José van Dijck
* A Constitutional Moment: How We Might Reimagine Platform Governance
Nicolas Suzor
* From the Telegraph to Twitter: The Case for the Digital Platform Act
Harold Feld
Conflicting Rights
* The New City Regulators
Sofia Ranchordas and Catalina Goanta
* Sanctions on Digital Platforms: Balancing Proportionality in the Modern Public Square
Engerrand Marique and Yseult Marique
* A New Framework for Online Content Moderation
Ivar Hartmann
Artificial Intelligence
* Socio-Ethical Values and Legal Rules on Automated Platforms: The Quest for a Symbiotic Relationship
Rolf H. Weber
* Democratising Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework
Giovanni De Gregorio
* Platform Values and Democratic Elections: How Can the Law Regulate Digital Disinformation?
Chris Marsden, Trisha Meyer and Ian Brown
Tax Avoidance
* The Progressive Policy Shift in the Debate on the International Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy: A “Pretext” for Overhaul of the International Tax Regime?
Alessandro Turina
* E-commerce and Effective VAT/GST Enforcement: Can Online Platforms Play a Valuable Role?
Luisa Scarcella
Annex
* Best Practices Platforms’ Implementation of the Right to an Effective Remedy
Collectively elaborated by members of the IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility
Dear colleagues,
I would like to thank - also on behalf of my coeditor Nicolo - the various members of this list who have submitted highly interesting papers for the Special Issue on Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance and have helped organising the IGF session where the SI will be released and debated with other stakeholders.
Free hard copies of the Special Issue will be distributed at the session that will take place on 27 November from 15:00 to 16:30 https://igf2019.sched.com/event/SU3d/dc-on-platform-responsibility
Here is a long description of the session https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-platform-values-c…
Below a shorter description of the session and the table of content of the SI.
I hope to meet some of you at the IGF
All the best
Luca
Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, AI and Tax Avoidance
This session will discuss three of the most crucial points of contention with regard to values underlying the operation of digital platforms: Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance.
The session will include presentations based on the papers featured in a special issue of the Computer Law & Security Review, celebrating five years of activities of the UN IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility and devoted to 'Platform Value(s): Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance'.
The Special Issue, which is the 2019 official outcome of the coalition, will include also the finalised Best Practices on Platforms' Implementation on the Right to Effective Remedy, produced by the Coalition between May 2018 and March 2019 (available here). Free hard copies of the Special Issue will be distributed.
The Special Issue will also be released in open access starting 27 November 2019. In the meantime, you can read the editorial "Platform value(s): A multidimensional framework for online responsibility" here.
The session will have the following agenda:
+ Opening remarks by Nicolo Zingales, University of Leeds, and Luca Belli, FGV
Part I- Platform Values, Freedom of Expression and Democracy
+ Keynote by Edison Lanza, Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Organization of American States
+ Nic Suzor, Queensland University of Technology
+ Monica Rosina, Facebook
Quick round of questions
Part II: Platform values and content moderation
+ Chris Marsden, University of Sussex
+ Ivar Hartmann, FGV
+ Giovanni De Gregorio, Univerista' Milano Bicocca
+ Dragana Obradovic, Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
Quick round of questions
Part III: Conflcting rights and values
+ Catherine Carnovale, Elsevier
+ Rolf H. Weber, University of Zurich
+ Catalina Goanta, Maastricht University
+ Yseult Marique, University of Essex
Open Debate
Table of contents of the Special Issue
+ Platform Value(s):A Multidimensional Framework for Online Responsibility
Luca Belli and Nicolo Zingales
Introductory Essays
+ Governing Digital Societies: Private Platforms, Public Values
José van Dijck
+ A Constitutional Moment: How We Might Reimagine Platform Governance
Nicolas Suzor
+ From the Telegraph to Twitter: The Case for the Digital Platform Act
Harold Feld
Conflicting Rights
+ The New City Regulators
Sofia Ranchordas and Catalina Goanta
+ Sanctions on Digital Platforms: Balancing Proportionality in the Modern Public Square
Engerrand Marique and Yseult Marique
+ A New Framework for Online Content Moderation
Ivar Hartmann
Artificial Intelligence
+ Socio-Ethical Values and Legal Rules on Automated Platforms: The Quest for a Symbiotic Relationship
Rolf H. Weber
+ Democratising Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework
Giovanni De Gregorio
+ Platform Values and Democratic Elections: How Can the Law Regulate Digital Disinformation?
Chris Marsden, Trisha Meyer and Ian Brown
Tax Avoidance
+ The Progressive Policy Shift in the Debate on the International Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy: A “Pretext” for Overhaul of the International Tax Regime?
Alessandro Turina
+ E-commerce and Effective VAT/GST Enforcement: Can Online Platforms Play a Valuable Role?
Luisa Scarcella
Annex
+ Best Practices Platforms' Implementation of the Right to an Effective Remedy
Collectively elaborated by members of the IGF Coalition on Platform Responsibility
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info | www.internet-governance.fgv.br
@1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
Dear all,
I would like to share a brief report on our RightsCon meeting, for those who were not able to participate.
The discussion focused on the organization of our IGF session; on the concrete output that we are elaborating ahead of the IGF (i.e. the special issue of the Computer Law & Security Review, dedicated to "Platform Values: Conflicting Rights, Artificial Intelligence and Tax Avoidance" https://www.journals.elsevier.com/computer-law-and-security-review/call-for… ) and on the strategies we may implement to stimulate better synergies between various stakeholder composing the coalition.
It was stressed that the IGF Session would benefit from the participation of both a representative of a platform and of a business that is being disrupted by digital platforms. As regards the former, it was stressed it would be better to avoid having the “classic” Google, FB, etc but rather involving a different kind of platform. Elsevir, which is developing AI solutions to manage its platform has expressed interest to join the debate. It was also suggested to have a professional journalist on the panel to represent the views of newspapers regarding and how they are coping with platforms' “disruption”.
These speakers will be included in addition to the contributors to the special issue, who will briefly present their findings.
As regards the special issue, I provided a brief update of the ongoing elaboration process. We received a good number of contributions, which are now under peer review. Many of the contributions will be presented by the authors and discussed on the 19th of July at the dedicated workshop we announced in the call for papers, to be held at FGV Law School. An important update as regards the special issue is that we negotiated with the Computer Law & Security Review to have the text in open access for one year.
Lastly, we agreed on the importance of organising the usual coalition reunion after our IGF session and to make an effort to include specially journalists, activists and regulators that may be interested in using the research featured in the special issue as well as the Best Practices that will also be annexed to the special issue. Both the special issue and the best practices will be considered out outcome and it was suggeste we should try to make an effort to make the outcomes visible to those stakeholders that may concretely using them. Civil society advocates and regulators would be particularly critical to involve in this perspective.
Please feel free to share any other information I might have forgotten.
All the best
Luca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luca Belli, PhD
Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation, FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro
Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
www.cyberbrics.info | www.internet-governance.fgv.br
@1lucabelli
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
Dear all,
As many of us will be at RightsCon, next week, I am writing to enquire on whether you might be interested in having a brief and convivial meeting to share ideas and organise our work ahead of the IGF. Last year, at RightsCon Toronto, we had the possibility to meet for one hour and the discussion was immensely useful and fruitful.
We have written to the RightsCon organisers to book a room on Thursday, 13 June. Please let us know (either on-list or via PM) if you are interested in joining the meeting and if there is any theme that you would like to prioritise for discussion.
All the best
Luca and Nicolo