Hi Marcelo, thank you very much for flagging this and sharing the text, very interesting data inside it.

In the past CWG-Internet in February, both Canada and the UK proposed also community networks as a topic for discussion. You can find all the contributions here: https://www.itu.int/md/S19-RCLINTPOL12-C/en. The countries who opposed community networks at the plenipot also blocked this from happening at the CWG other delegations

With a strong country from the Global South like Brazil submitting it, this time the result may be different. Let's follow up the result.

best,

carlos

Dear fellows I am writing here to ask for all of u to pay attention about the public calls that the agencies are doing in the member states to make suggestions to the public consultation of ITU about CNs

I will share the doc with some suggestions, that the folks of ISOC-BR and Luca helped to make it better :-) in the last draft of Anatel.

PS.: Remebering that this doc is it in the context of the brazilian contributions

BR

Marcelo Saldanha
IBEBrasil

_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3@listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3

-- 
Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
Association for Progressive Communications
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-networks-and-other-community-based-connectivity
Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym