We always had the MTU message from Batman-adv and I think you can
increase the MTU over 1500 for an ethernet interface only if it supports
jumbo frames (which usually happens for gigabit interfaces).
Contrarywise, on the wifi interfaces the limit should be higher and we
can use an MTU that suites Batman-adv usage.
LibreRouter people in the list should know much more than me on this topic.
On the squashfs error, I have no idea.
Looks like one of the two PicoStation's flash or RAM memory is damaged.
Do you see that message in both PicoStations?
Can you specify better what you mean with "both have internet"?
Can you ping some internet domain from inside SSH on a router?
If you didn't configure the ethernet interface as WAN, it could be that
the client you're connecting with has internet due to
https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/issues/658
but this would imply a very erratic behaviour, in which some times you
accept the home router's DHCP offer (and the internet connection works
BUT thisnode.info do not work and this would explain why thisnode.info
stops working) and some times you accept the PicoStation's DHCP offer
(and you do not have internet as you did not configure any WAN interface).
Ciao!
Ilario
On 10/15/20 10:18 AM, Juergen Kimmel wrote:
> New findings:
> After a while the device gets unresponsive with thisnode.info
> <http://thisnode.info> but responds at the ip address of anygw (10.236.0.1)
> moreover dmesg:
> [ 34.041779] batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface eth0_252 is too
> small (1496) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets
> going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could
> impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1532 would solve the problem.
> [ 34.066138] batman_adv: bat0: Interface activated: eth0_252
> [ 38.885984] SQUASHFS error: xz decompression failed, data probably
> corrupt
> [ 38.892962] SQUASHFS error: squashfs_read_data failed to read block
> 0x17c8b2
>
> I changed the MTU but I think this has nothing to do with this error
>
>
> Am Di., 13. Okt. 2020 um 19:36 Uhr schrieb Juergen Kimmel
> <juergenkimmel@gmail.com <mailto:juergenkimmel@gmail.com>>:
>
> Situation has changed for whatever reason.
> Now I have two Picostations meshing, one connected to a router
> There is no wan interface visible from luci, but both have internet
>
> Ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr DC:9F:DB:0B:17:CA
> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
> Interrupt:4
>
> So one Picostation acts as gateway but is not configured as such
>
> network:
>
> config interface 'loopback'
> option ifname 'lo'
> option proto 'static'
> option ipaddr '127.0.0.1'
> option netmask '255.0.0.0'
>
> config globals 'globals'
>
> config interface 'lan'
> option type 'bridge'
> option proto 'static'
> option ip6assign '60'
> option netmask '255.255.0.0'
> option mtu '1500'
> option ip6addr 'fdec:9fee:f1aa::ca17:b00/64'
> option ipaddr '10.236.23.202'
> list ifname 'bat0'
> list ifname 'eth0'
>
> config interface 'bat0'
> option proto 'batadv'
> option bridge_loop_avoidance '1'
> option multicast_mode '0'
> option distributed_arp_table '0'
> option gw_mode 'client'
>
> config device 'lm_net_br_lan_anygw_dev'
> option type 'macvlan'
> option name 'anygw'
> option ifname 'br-lan'
> option macaddr 'aa:aa:aa:ec:9f:aa'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_br_lan_anygw_if'
> option ifname 'anygw'
> option auto '1'
> option netmask '255.255.0.0'
> option proto 'static'
> option ipaddr '10.236.0.1'
> option ip6addr 'fdec:9fee:f1aa::1/64'
>
> config rule6 'lm_net_anygw_rule6'
> option src 'fdec:9fee:f1aa::1/128'
> option lookup '170'
>
> config route6 'lm_net_anygw_route6'
> option interface 'lm_net_br_lan_anygw_if'
> option target 'fdec:9fee:f1aa::/64'
> option table '170'
>
> config rule 'lm_net_anygw_rule4'
> option src '10.236.0.1/32 <http://10.236.0.1/32>'
> option lookup '170'
>
> config route 'lm_net_anygw_route4'
> option interface 'lm_net_br_lan_anygw_if'
> option target '10.236.0.0'
> option netmask '255.255.0.0'
> option table '170'
>
> config device 'lm_net_eth0_batadv_dev'
> option type '8021ad'
> option name 'eth0_252'
> option ifname 'eth0'
> option vid '252'
> option macaddr '02:95:39:0b:17:ca'
> option mtu '1496'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_eth0_batadv_if'
> option auto '1'
> option ifname 'eth0_252'
> option proto 'batadv_hardif'
> option master 'bat0'
>
> config device 'lm_net_eth0_babeld_dev'
> option type '8021ad'
> option name 'eth0_17'
> option ifname 'eth0'
> option vid '17'
> option mtu '1496'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_eth0_babeld_if'
> option auto '1'
> option ifname 'eth0_17'
> option proto 'static'
> option ipaddr '10.236.23.202'
> option netmask '255.255.255.255'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_wlan0_mesh'
> option proto 'none'
> option mtu '1536'
> option auto '1'
>
> config device 'lm_net_wlan0_mesh_batadv_dev'
> option type '8021ad'
> option name 'wlan0-mesh_252'
> option ifname '@lm_net_wlan0_mesh'
> option vid '252'
> option mtu '1532'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_wlan0_mesh_batadv_if'
> option auto '1'
> option ifname 'wlan0-mesh_252'
> option proto 'batadv_hardif'
> option master 'bat0'
>
> config device 'lm_net_wlan0_mesh_babeld_dev'
> option type '8021ad'
> option name 'wlan0-mesh_17'
> option ifname '@lm_net_wlan0_mesh'
> option vid '17'
>
> config interface 'lm_net_wlan0_mesh_babeld_if'
> option auto '1'
> option ifname 'wlan0-mesh_17'
> option proto 'static'
> option ipaddr '10.236.23.202'
> option netmask '255.255.255.255'
>
> Am Mo., 12. Okt. 2020 um 16:57 Uhr schrieb Ilario Gelmetti
> <iochesonome@gmail.com <mailto:iochesonome@gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi!
> Some comments in line:
>
> On 10/11/20 2:38 PM, Juergen Kimmel wrote:
> > Powered by LuCI openwrt-19.07 branch (git-20.247.75781-0d0ab01)
> > <https://github.com/openwrt/luci> / LiMe master development
> (master rev.
> > 7181c3b 20200927_1250)
> >
> > Picostation connected to the router is no longer accessible
> via wifi.
>
> This is weird.
> The Picostation M2 is not emitting any accessible network via wifi?
>
> It could be a RAM problem: Ubiquiti Picostation *2 have just 32
> MB of
> RAM memory.
> Connect via ethernet cable and check the dmesg command output,
> looking
> for any "out of memory OOM kill" message.
> In order to have less memory usage you can disable the web interface
> (LuCI or lime-app) with:
> /etc/init.d/uhttpd disable
> and reboot.
>
> In case the problem was not a RAM limitation, please upload
> somewhere
> the output of the lime-report command or, if you don't have the
> lime-report command, the content of:
>
> /etc/config/wireless
> /etc/config/network
>
> and the output of the commands:
>
> wifi status
> iwinfo
>
> > Obviously the internet access is not detected and no wan
> interface is
> > configured.
> > lime-hwd-openwrt-wan and check-internet are installed I
> thought they
> > would do some kind of magic here.
>
> This is normal instead: both vendor and OpenWrt recognize the only
> ethernet port of Ubiquiti Picostation as LAN (not as WAN).
> What the lime-hwd-openwrt-wan package is designed to do is: check if
> OpenWrt would use an ethernet port as WAN, if positive,
> configure that
> port as WAN.
> In this case, OpenWrt use the port as LAN and thus
> lime-hwd-openwrt-wan
> does not do anything.
> In these cases what you have to write is an interface-specific
> configuration in /etc/config/lime-node as documented here:
> https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/blob/e572b4531b2fdcc89965974e0b2268cf4f269b32/packages/lime-docs/files/lime-example#L197-L205
>
> Something like this should be enough:
>
> config net mywan
> option linux_name 'eth0'
> list protocols 'wan'
>
> > Regards
> > Jürgen
>
> Let us know how it goes!
> Ciao,
> Ilario
>
--
Ilario
iochesonome@gmail.com
ilario@sindominio.net
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users