http://www.tedxbeaconstreet.com/
Sunday Evening East Coast time.
I expect that the talk I give at IGF will be similar because I've spent a lot of time honing this. I expect to add more on what one can do reduce the ideas to practice for IGF.
Hi DC3ers,
I have just now become aware of the existence of this Dynamic Coalition:
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/130-dynamic-coalitions/3072-dynamic-coalitio…
Were you aware?
They will be having a session right after one of ours:
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/igf-meeting/igf-2016/910-dc-connec…
I see Facebook, Verizon and the World Economic Forum as stakeholders, so I guess it's quite a different approach to what we are trying to accomplish, but it's interesting to have this in our radar.
I have written to Anriette (APC) to ask if she can share some more detail on what's the plan with this DC.
Cheers!
Nico
Hi all,
Here is the v.3.0 of the Declaration https://pad.codigosur.org/GuadalajaraDeclaration
I think we have a very good text that we can submit to the IGF Secretariat as a DC3 outcome, together with the DC3 Report (or at least the Outline of the Report, in light of the fact that the Report is 172-page long)
You can find the Outline of the Report here https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/DC3_Report_Outline
FYI, free hard-copies of the report will be distributed at the DC3 session (the printing and editing is sponsored by CTS/FGV). The Report will also be available online under Creative Commons License.
Regarding the Declaration, although I was initially favourable to the use of square km rather than miles, some of you (particularly Bob) made some very good points on the usefulness of adopting/enhancing existing terminology. In this perspective, I think if could be wiser to speak about "first square mile" (see Preamble)
Lastly, as you may recall, the IGF Secretariat asked to submit 5 statements that describe our outcome and can be used to request feedback on the DC3 outcome to the IGF participants. I suggest we simply use the preamble and the 4 paragraphs of the Declaration as statements. Let me know if you have different suggestions on the matter.
Many thanks for your excellent feedback and for the great debate so far.
All the best
Luca
[FGV Direito Rio]
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/> luca.belli(a)fgv.br
+55 21 3799 5763
[http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]
Community networks again among the best broadband initiatives in Europe !
I glad to read that RemIX (Future-proof and quality of service) and
FibreOptic (Socio-economic impact and affordability) got the EU
Broadband Awards 2016, both community initiatives!
Roger Baig is in touch with HUBS about RemIX and William came to a
couple of SAX guifi.net meetings. I’ve never heard before about the
FibreOptic community initiative but the description sounds good.
After guifi.net being awarded in 2015, clearly innovation, impact,
affordability, future-proofing is coming to Europe through community
initiatives.
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/winners-european-broadba…
Leandro.
Hey all.
Just a quick question: What events are there happening at the IGF
related to DC3? Specifically, I'd like to know dates/times and locations
so I can plan around other existing commitments.
THANKS
Peter Bloom/Rhizomatica
On 14/11/16 06:00, dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net wrote:
> Send DC3 mailing list submissions to
> dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dc3-owner(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of DC3 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RES: Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For
> Public Comment (Luca Belli)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:04:51 +0000
> From: Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>
> To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Cc: "igf(a)unog.ch" <igf(a)unog.ch>, Anri van der Spuy
> <anri(a)avds.consulting>
> Subject: [DC3] RES: Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices
> Open For Public Comment
> Message-ID: <4B6296ABAE1FC944984F6C9FE996FE19A807C628@dc6002>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, last week I sent to the IGF Secretariat the paragraphs on CN they requested http://listas.altermundi.net/pipermail/dc3/2016-October/000342.html
> and to which various DC3 members have contributed
> https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Paragraphs_for_Connecting_the_Nex_Bil…
>
> If the requested paras have not been incorporated yet, they should be incorporated before the IGF
> Best
> Luca
>
> ________________________________
> De: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net [dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net] em nome de Jane Coffin [coffin(a)isoc.org]
> Enviado: s?bado, 12 de novembro de 2016 10:40
> Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
> Assunto: Re: [DC3] Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For Public Comment
>
> +1 To adding a note in that document about community networking ? with a highlight that community networking can be wireless, fixed, whatever one chooses.
>
>
> Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org
> Skype: janercoffin
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
>
> From: <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Mike Jensen <mike(a)apc.org>
> Organization: APC
> Reply-To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Date: Friday, November 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM
> To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Subject: Re: [DC3] Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For Public Comment
>
>
> Carlos, I agree, I've had a look at the review document on Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion, and there doesn't seem to be any mention of Community Networking at all in it that I can see.
>
> Should we simply add a comment at the appropriate place in the document which provides a link to the declaration ? The Review Document is at https://www.intgovforum.org/review/cenb/
>
> We have until Nov 14th..
>
> Mike
>
> On 11-11-2016 12:05, Carlos Rey-Moreno wrote:
> Hi all, I think this a good opportunity to include some of our ideas in the official Best Practices.
> The time is short, but might be worthwhile.
> best,
> carlos
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> You will remember that we recently shared on this list a call to contribute to developing the IGF 2016 Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/policy-options-for-connecti…>.
>
>
>
> I'm pleased to share that the draft IGF 2016 Best Practices are now also ready and open for comment. Developed in an open and multistakeholder fashion, they focus this year on Gender and Access, Cybersecurity, IXPs and IPv6.
>
>
>
> You'll find below additional information on how to contribute.
>
>
>
> We encourage you to participate and to share this information with your networks.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Constance
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> The draft output documents of the four 2016 IGF Best Practice Forums (BPFs) are now all available for public comment on the IGF review platform<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/>.
>
>
>
> The IGF community is hereby invited and encouraged to comment on all of these documents between now and the upcoming 11th IGF in Mexico from 6-9 December 2016<http://igf2016.mx/>.
>
>
>
> While each BPF adopted its own unique methodology suited to its specific theme over the past few months, these documents were all produced as the outcomes of multistakeholder, bottom-up and community-driven processes. We are thankful to the numerous volunteers and community members who have and continue to contribute to these valuable processes.
>
>
>
> How to comment:
>
> Each BPF has a separate section on the IGF?s review platform:
>
> ? 2016 IGF BPF on Gender and Access<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Overcoming barriers to enable women?s meaningful Internet access
>
> ? 2016 IGF BPF on Cybersecurity<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Building Confidence and Security in the use of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) through Enhanced Cooperation and Collaboration.
>
> ? 2016 IGF BPF on IXPs<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Contributing to the success and continued development of Internet exchange points.
>
> ? 2016 IGF BPF IPv6<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment.
>
> For ease of use, all BPFs have also sub-divided their drafts into different parts on the review platform.
>
> Make use of the navigation bar on the left of the Review Platform to move between different sections and to read and comment on the entire document for each BPF. Each Part may furthermore be divided into sub-sections or ?pages?. Please use the page buttons at the bottom of a Part to scroll to sub-sections or pages in each Part.
>
> What to know when commenting:
>
> All comments on the review platform are public. For contributors preferring to remain anonymous, pseudonyms may be used.
>
> All comments have to adhere to the IGF's Code of Conduct<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-code-of-conduct-0> in respect of fairness and reasonableness.
>
> Thank you in advance for your active engagement and participation in the IGF BPFs and we look forward to reviewing all of your comments!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> IGF Secretariat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe,
> please log into the ISOC Member Portal:
> https://portal.isoc.org/
> Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
> PostDoctoral Fellow University of the Western Cape
> Zenzeleni Networks: zenzeleni.net<http://zenzeleni.net>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxTPSWMX26M
> Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
> Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> DC3 mailing list
>
> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
>
> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>
>
>
DC on Public Access in Libraries at 15:00-16:30 on Dec. 7. Should tie in as public access at libraries and other centers builds on approach of connecting community anchor institutions.
A common infrastructure strategy in US with anchors as intermediate end points in open middle mile network builds. Serving priority populations in e-gov, education, health, etc, while also lowering cost/risk of last mile investment.
All welcome!
Don Means
GigLibraries.Net
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 10:55 AM, dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net wrote:
>
> Send DC3 mailing list submissions to
> dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dc3-owner(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of DC3 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: DC3 Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12 (peter)
> 2. Re: DC3 Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12 (Jane Coffin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:47:43 -0600
> From: peter <peter(a)rhizomatica.org>
> To: dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
> Subject: Re: [DC3] DC3 Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12
> Message-ID: <582A06CF.3050401(a)rhizomatica.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hey all.
>
> Just a quick question: What events are there happening at the IGF
> related to DC3? Specifically, I'd like to know dates/times and locations
> so I can plan around other existing commitments.
>
> THANKS
>
> Peter Bloom/Rhizomatica
>
>
> On 14/11/16 06:00, dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net wrote:
>> Send DC3 mailing list submissions to
>> dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> dc3-request(a)listas.altermundi.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> dc3-owner(a)listas.altermundi.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of DC3 digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. RES: Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For
>> Public Comment (Luca Belli)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:04:51 +0000
>> From: Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>
>> To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
>> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> Cc: "igf(a)unog.ch" <igf(a)unog.ch>, Anri van der Spuy
>> <anri(a)avds.consulting>
>> Subject: [DC3] RES: Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices
>> Open For Public Comment
>> Message-ID: <4B6296ABAE1FC944984F6C9FE996FE19A807C628@dc6002>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> FYI, last week I sent to the IGF Secretariat the paragraphs on CN they requested http://listas.altermundi.net/pipermail/dc3/2016-October/000342.html
>> and to which various DC3 members have contributed
>> https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Paragraphs_for_Connecting_the_Nex_Bil…
>>
>> If the requested paras have not been incorporated yet, they should be incorporated before the IGF
>> Best
>> Luca
>>
>> ________________________________
>> De: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net [dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net] em nome de Jane Coffin [coffin(a)isoc.org]
>> Enviado: s?bado, 12 de novembro de 2016 10:40
>> Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
>> Assunto: Re: [DC3] Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For Public Comment
>>
>> +1 To adding a note in that document about community networking ? with a highlight that community networking can be wireless, fixed, whatever one chooses.
>>
>>
>> Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org
>> Skype: janercoffin
>> Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
>>
>> From: <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Mike Jensen <mike(a)apc.org>
>> Organization: APC
>> Reply-To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> Date: Friday, November 11, 2016 at 11:08 PM
>> To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> Subject: Re: [DC3] Fwd: [Internet Policy] 2016 IGF Best Practices Open For Public Comment
>>
>>
>> Carlos, I agree, I've had a look at the review document on Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion, and there doesn't seem to be any mention of Community Networking at all in it that I can see.
>>
>> Should we simply add a comment at the appropriate place in the document which provides a link to the declaration ? The Review Document is at https://www.intgovforum.org/review/cenb/
>>
>> We have until Nov 14th..
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 11-11-2016 12:05, Carlos Rey-Moreno wrote:
>> Hi all, I think this a good opportunity to include some of our ideas in the official Best Practices.
>> The time is short, but might be worthwhile.
>> best,
>> carlos
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> You will remember that we recently shared on this list a call to contribute to developing the IGF 2016 Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/policy-options-for-connecti…>.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm pleased to share that the draft IGF 2016 Best Practices are now also ready and open for comment. Developed in an open and multistakeholder fashion, they focus this year on Gender and Access, Cybersecurity, IXPs and IPv6.
>>
>>
>>
>> You'll find below additional information on how to contribute.
>>
>>
>>
>> We encourage you to participate and to share this information with your networks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Constance
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> The draft output documents of the four 2016 IGF Best Practice Forums (BPFs) are now all available for public comment on the IGF review platform<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/>.
>>
>>
>>
>> The IGF community is hereby invited and encouraged to comment on all of these documents between now and the upcoming 11th IGF in Mexico from 6-9 December 2016<http://igf2016.mx/>.
>>
>>
>>
>> While each BPF adopted its own unique methodology suited to its specific theme over the past few months, these documents were all produced as the outcomes of multistakeholder, bottom-up and community-driven processes. We are thankful to the numerous volunteers and community members who have and continue to contribute to these valuable processes.
>>
>>
>>
>> How to comment:
>>
>> Each BPF has a separate section on the IGF?s review platform:
>>
>> ? 2016 IGF BPF on Gender and Access<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Overcoming barriers to enable women?s meaningful Internet access
>>
>> ? 2016 IGF BPF on Cybersecurity<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Building Confidence and Security in the use of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) through Enhanced Cooperation and Collaboration.
>>
>> ? 2016 IGF BPF on IXPs<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Contributing to the success and continued development of Internet exchange points.
>>
>> ? 2016 IGF BPF IPv6<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…> - Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment.
>>
>> For ease of use, all BPFs have also sub-divided their drafts into different parts on the review platform.
>>
>> Make use of the navigation bar on the left of the Review Platform to move between different sections and to read and comment on the entire document for each BPF. Each Part may furthermore be divided into sub-sections or ?pages?. Please use the page buttons at the bottom of a Part to scroll to sub-sections or pages in each Part.
>>
>> What to know when commenting:
>>
>> All comments on the review platform are public. For contributors preferring to remain anonymous, pseudonyms may be used.
>>
>> All comments have to adhere to the IGF's Code of Conduct<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-code-of-conduct-0> in respect of fairness and reasonableness.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your active engagement and participation in the IGF BPFs and we look forward to reviewing all of your comments!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> IGF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe,
>> please log into the ISOC Member Portal:
>> https://portal.isoc.org/
>> Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
>> PostDoctoral Fellow University of the Western Cape
>> Zenzeleni Networks: zenzeleni.net<http://zenzeleni.net>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxTPSWMX26M
>> Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
>> Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> DC3 mailing list
>>
>> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
>>
>> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>>
>>
>>
Hi all, I think this a good opportunity to include some of our ideas in the
official Best Practices.
The time is short, but might be worthwhile.
best,
carlos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Dear All,
You will remember that we recently shared on this list a call to contribute
to developing the IGF 2016 Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the
Next Billion
<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/policy-options-for-connecti…>.
I'm pleased to share that the draft *IGF 2016 Best Practices* are now also
ready and open for comment. Developed in an open and multistakeholder
fashion, they focus this year on Gender and Access, Cybersecurity, IXPs and
IPv6.
You'll find below additional information on how to contribute.
We encourage you to participate and to share this information with your
networks.
Many thanks,
Constance
-----
Dear All,
The draft output documents of the four 2016 IGF Best Practice Forums (BPFs)
are now all available for public comment on the IGF review platform
<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/>.
The IGF community is hereby invited and encouraged to comment on all of
these documents between now and the upcoming 11th IGF in Mexico from 6-9
December 2016 <http://igf2016.mx/>.
While each BPF adopted its own unique methodology suited to its specific
theme over the past few months, these documents were all produced as the
outcomes of multistakeholder, bottom-up and community-driven processes. We
are thankful to the numerous volunteers and community members who have and
continue to contribute to these valuable processes.
*How to comment:*
Each BPF has a separate section on the IGF’s review platform:
• 2016 IGF BPF on Gender and Access
<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…>
- *Overcoming barriers to enable women’s meaningful Internet access*
• 2016 IGF BPF on Cybersecurity
<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…>
- *Building Confidence and Security in the use of Information and
Communications Technologies (ICTs) through Enhanced Cooperation and
Collaboration*.
• 2016 IGF BPF on IXPs
<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…>
- *Contributing to the success and continued development of Internet
exchange points.*
• 2016 IGF BPF IPv6
<https://www.intgovforum.org/review/2016-igf-best-practice-forums-bpfs-draft…>
- *Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful
IPv6 deployment.*
For ease of use, all BPFs have also sub-divided their drafts into different
parts on the review platform.
Make use of the navigation bar on the left of the Review Platform to move
between different sections and to read and comment on the entire document
for each BPF. Each Part may furthermore be divided into sub-sections or
‘pages’. Please use the page buttons at the bottom of a Part to scroll to
sub-sections or pages in each Part.
*What to know when commenting:*
All comments on the review platform are public. For contributors preferring
to remain anonymous, pseudonyms may be used.
All comments have to adhere to the IGF's Code of Conduct
<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-code-of-conduct-0> in
respect of fairness and reasonableness.
*Thank you in advance for your active engagement and participation in the
IGF BPFs and we look forward to reviewing all of your comments!*
Best regards,
IGF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe,
please log into the ISOC Member Portal:
https://portal.isoc.org/
Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.
--
Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
PostDoctoral Fellow University of the Western Cape
Zenzeleni Networks: zenzeleni.nethttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxTPSWMX26M
Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
Hi all,
The IGF secretariat requested a shorter version of the DC3 Declaration that can more easily fit into the IGF Survey.
The IGF Survey was first introduced last year and aims at allowing IGF participants to express feedback on DC outcomes
FYI, here are some examples of DC outcomes already included into surveys https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/surveys
As you can imagine, it is not possible to reduce/simplify too much the content of the Declaration but I have tried to do some cuts. See here https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/short_version_of_the_declaration_for_…
Please do not hesitate to further reduce. Help with this is much appreciated.
Also, please note that both the Outcome paper and the DC3 report will include the entire Declaration. The shortened version is ONLY needed to make the Declaration fit into the (quite limited) format of the IGF survey.
I will send the short version to the secretariat on 15 November. Any help reducing the text by then is very welcome.
Best
Luca
[FGV Direito Rio]
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/> luca.belli(a)fgv.br
+55 21 3799 5763
[http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]
As an FYI (is FYI understood outside the US?) I'm scheduled to speak to
http://www.tedxbeaconstreet.com/ and will talk about connectivity as
infrastructure.
I'm planning to talk about why we are limiting ourselves when we rely on a
telecommunications framing for connectivity and instead need to think about
creating opportunity. I also plan to write a companian essay. It won't quite
align with the current DC3 document but I hope it helps us more towards
creating our own connected future ... and more. It's also open APIs and a
new literacy. But given that it's 15 minutes my goal is to make the concepts
accessible.
http://frankston.com