Dear all,
In case you will be at IETF 101, I would like to invite you to my presentation on Network
Self-determination on Thursday afternoon at 15:50.
I have also been asked to draft a brief article (that will be published on the IETF
journal) to provide an intro to the concept. Below the draft, which is based on my paper
on network
self-determination<https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19924> and
cites many initiatives developed by DC3 members over the past years.
Any feedback - possibly, before next week - is more than welcome and will be acknowledged
in the final version.
Hope to see some of you on Thursday
All the best
Luca
De: Luca Belli
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 16 de março de 2018 18:49
Para: 'Hrpc' <hrpc(a)irtf.org>rg>; 'Niels ten Oever'
<mail(a)nielstenoever.net>
Cc: 'Matthew Ford' <ford(a)isoc.org>rg>; 'Mallory Knodel'
<mallory(a)article19.org>
Assunto: Intro to Network Self-determination
Dear all,
I have drafted a post as an introduction to my presentation on Network Self-determination
(at the bottom of this email).
Should you be interested in providing your feedback on this DRAFT, feel free to reply to
this email or to use the Etherpad or Googledoc below.
Googledoc here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15eHsqEC_gQip6NBTIpF-aMyg0DgVXxinr2wdYxh…
Etherpad here
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/NetworkSelf-determination
Feedback through live interactions during or after the presentation are also highly
appreciated :)
The consolidated draft of the article will be published in the IETF Journal, right after
IETF 101. Obviously, all people having provided feedback will be duly acknowledged.
Many thanks and kind regards
Luca
NONFINAL DRAFT
Network Self-determination:
When building the Internet becomes a right
Luca Belli
Anyone reading this article would agree that the Internet and ICTs play an increasingly
essential role in every connected individual's life. The accessibility and
well-functioning of network infrastructure at affordable and non-discriminatory conditions
facilitate significantly the full enjoyment of one's fundamental rights, as Internet
users can easily access knowledge and education, conduct businesses by trading goods and
services online, and utilize digitized public services, spanning from tax-paying to
applying for public schools or receiving remote medical consultations via e-health.
As connected individuals, we can safely state that the Internet has become integral part
of our lives and our environment, affecting substantially how we form our opinions, how we
socialize and learn and, ultimately, what opportunities we are able to grasp over the
course of our lives. But what about the unconnected?
The current digital (r)evolution can also deepen divides in our societies, due to the
uneven distribution of digital dividends between those for which connectivity is available
and easily affordable and those who are either unconnected or face considerable challenges
to connect.[1]
This article briefly explores how groups of unconnected and scarcely connected individuals
can regain control over their digital futures, building their own community networks and
enjoying what I define as "Network Self-determination."[2] I argue that Network
Self-determination leads to several positive externalities for the affected communities
while preserving the Internet as a decentralized, interoperable and generative network of
networks.
In this perspective, concrete examples of communities enjoying Network Self-determination
seem to prove that "the design and development of the Internet infrastructure have a
growing impact on society"[3] and can construct a digital environment that enables
human rights.
Mainstream networks are not so mainstream
In almost every country in the world, Internet connectivity predominantly relies on the
existence of network infrastructure built and managed by for-profit operators. Such
infrastructure is primarily composed of "mainstream networks," which are those
networks that RFC 7962[4] characterizes as controlled in a top-down fashion by the
operators; spanning large areas; requiring a substantial investment to be built and
maintained; and not foreseeing the possibility for users to participate in the
network's governance.
Not surprisingly, mainstream networks are mainly deployed and operationalized in densely
populated areas, where return on investments can be quite fast and straightforward, due to
the high demand of connectivity by thousands - or millions - of city dwellers. The
situation, however, is not the same in rural areas or in the peripheries of major
metropolises, where the scarce density and lower standards of living cannot guarantee
immediate and sufficient return on investment for operators.
In rural and peripheral areas, which are home to the 48% of the world population that is
currently unconnected,[5] the sole reliance on mainstream networks does not prove to be an
effective strategy to expand connectivity. Indeed, the prospect of a missed return on
investment discourages development of infrastructure, leading to lack of coverage or to
such high prices and low quality of service that potential or existing users might be
discouraged from subscribing to available Internet-access offerings. In such context,
several studies have pointed out that the lack of competition can make Internet-access
offerings so prohibitively expensive that locals need to sacrifice food to afford
communications.[6]
Most importantly, individuals living in unconnected or scarcely connected areas may
rightfully fail to see the appeal of Internet access because any services or content that
would improve their welfare - such as local government services, information and
educational material in local languages and platforms making available local products and
services - are not available online.
Do-It-Yourself Internet
Despite the above scenario, many individuals living in unconnected or scarcely connected
communities have realized that Internet connectivity is a vector for many economic, social
and cultural opportunities and have taken action to stop being digitally-marginalized, due
to market failures and inefficient public policies, and start building their own community
networks, to become the protagonists of their digital futures.
Concretely, such reasoning has become possible thanks to the steady reduction in
infrastructure costs - particularly, regarding bandwidth and network equipment - that,
over the past decade, has facilitated the deployment of community networks with reasonably
low investments.
Community networks are crowdsourced initiatives. Described by RFC 7962 as
"alternative networks," they are "networks that do not share the
characteristics of mainstream network deployments." On the contrary, community
networks are better characterized by the fact that they are developed in a bottom-up
fashion, in order to be utilized and managed by the local community as commons. As
stressed by the Declaration on Community Connectivity[7] these networks are
"structured to be open, free, and to respect network neutrality. Such networks rely
on the active participation of local communities in the design, development, deployment,
and management of shared infrastructure as a common resource, owned by the community, and
operated in a democratic fashion."
Besides representing a viable solution to the limits of mainstream networks, community
networks also ensure that Internet traffic is managed with no commercially motivated
discrimination, thus respecting net neutrality[8] by default. Indeed, all network users
are partners in the provision of connectivity and in the development of services for the
local community, thus making it much more difficult that the provider - which is the
community itself - discriminate content, applications or services based on commercial
considerations.
These initiatives demonstrate that connectivity, openness, free choice and full enjoyment
of fundamental rights are not amenities reserved to opulent city-dwellers but basic needs
to which everyone is entitled and that everyone can and must enjoy. Moreover, they prove
that "connectivity increases the capacity for individuals to exercise their
rights."[9]
When the last mile becomes the first mile
Community networking evidences that, in many circumstances, the unconnected can connect
themselves, as longs as they have information on how to build[10] their network
infrastructure and the freedom to choose this option.
It is precisely in such perspective that an ample range of community networks emerged in
many diverse countries, going from the UK<https://b4rn.org.uk/> to
Argentina<http://www.altermundi.net/> and from
Brazil<http://www.coolab.org/quem-somos/> to
Spain<http://guifi.net/>t/>.
Broadband for the Rural North, or B4RN, which is pronounced "barn," was
initiated in 2011 by a group of farmers and a hairdresser in Lancashire, U.K., who decided
to overcome the lack of connectivity by starting self-installing fibre. Today the B4RN
network connects 40 parishes and provides speeds as high as 1 gigabit per second.
The NGO AlterMundi,[11] which is behind QuintanaLibre, a community network in the
Argentinian province of Córdoba, prides itself on having successfully developed a
"geek-free" model to overcome the main challenges posed by rural environments,
the scarcity of engineers and reduced incomes, by developing an easy to implement and
cost-efficient network technology. Importantly, the availability of connectivity has
stimulated the development of several applications by the locals for the locals, including
an information portal, a chat service, a VoIP server, community radio streaming, a file
sharing system and gaming applications.
The AlterMundi-affiliated networks also provide Internet access to three schools, giving
students the opportunity to access online resources. Similarly, the Brazilian NGO
Coolab[12] provides connectivity and ICT training to dozen children through the Casa dos
Meninos project while connecting and entire village via the Fumaça community network, in
the Rio de Janeiro state.
The most successful example is
Guifi.net that, besides being the biggest and the most
populated community network in the world with over 85,000 users, is particularly
outstanding for its common-pool-resource philosophy that favors the establishment of
"a disruptive economic model based on the commons model and the collaborative
economy,"[13] encouraging small, local entrants to develop new applications and to
extend the network themselves.[14] Indeed,
Guifi.net members have generated a variety of
services[15], amongst which VoIP servers, IRC servers, videoconference and mail servers
and broadcast radios.
Importantly, besides expanding the Internet and promoting innovation in a decentralized
fashion, community networks like
Guifi.net have created dozens of new jobs related to
network maintenance and entirely new digital ecosystems. Indeed community networking
generally features capacity-building programs for locals to acquire the skills they need
to be developers, creators and online entrepreneurs.
In this perspective, community networks, built by the people for the people,[16] should
not be considered as the last mile of the Internet but rather as the first mile, for they
have a vital role in maximizing the generative nature of the Internet, decentralizing
innovation and empowering the unconnected.
Network Self-determination
Examples of community networks show that these initiatives nurture the development of
community-tailored services, stimulating new opportunities for learning, trading and
employment for locals.
Hence, these initiatives provide a sound evidence base on which a right to "Network
Self-determination" can be constructed. I propose the concept of Network
Self-determination as the right to freely associate to define, in a democratic fashion,
the design, development and management of network infrastructure as a common good, in
order to freely seek, impart and receive information and innovation.
While community networking proves that Network Self-determination already exists de facto
even without being explicitly consecrated de jure, it is important to stress that this
concept is also solidly grounded in International human rights law.
The first article of both the Charter of the United Nations and the two International
Covenants of Human Rights decisively affirm that, by virtue of the fundamental right to
self-determination, all peoples are free to pursue their economic, social and cultural
development as well as self-organization. According to both Articles 1(3) of both
Covenants, all states have an obligation "to promote the realization of the right to
self-determination," which is considered the collective right of a given community to
determine its own destiny.
Community networks foster Network Self-determination, for they allow individuals to decide
independently how to pursue their economic, social and cultural development, choosing
which kind of technology, applications and content are best suited to meet the needs of
the local community and using and developing them at the local level, in a
quintessentially distributed fashion. The goal of community networking is indeed to
empower individuals who will become new, active participants in the Internet, thus
enjoying the benefits of connectivity while contributing to the evolution the network of
networks as "a large, varied and evolving space of technology."[17]
Rights, as technologies, are the product of history
The enjoyment of Network Self-determination through the development of community networks
can prompt several positive externalities, thus fostering a decentralised Internet and
allowing previously unconnected or scarcely connected individuals to access knowledge and
education, create new applications and find occupations, having access to the entire
spectrum of opportunities to which any individual should be entitled.
Enthusiasm and optimism regarding community networking should be tempered with a good dose
of pragmatism, though. Indeed, alternative networks should be seen as a valuable
complement to existing approaches rather than a silver bullet that can solve all
connectivity problems. Community networks require sound planning and good governance to be
successful and face many technical and policy obstacles over their path. In this
perspective, the IETF community should consider that Internet standards are vital to allow
the establishment, interoperability and, potentially, the federation of community
networks.
There is no doubt that Network Self-determination reinforces the distributed nature of the
Internet and there is no reason why individuals should not have the possibility to build
the Internet themselves, improving their standards of living while bridging digital
divides.
Communities around the globe are discovering they have the potential to create alternative
networks and many of them are already doing so. As the Italian philosopher Norberto Bobbio
famously argued, human rights are the product of historical evolutions.[18] In this
spirit, everyone should be free to enjoy Network Self-determination, associating and
building a new piece of the Internet.
[1] See
http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016
[2] See Belli L. (2017). Network Self-Determination and the Positive Externalities of
Community Networks.
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19924
[3] See RFC 8280
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8280#page-40
[4] See
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7962.txt
[5] See
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017…
[6] See e.g. Rey-Moreno, C., Blignaut, R., May, J., & Tucker, W. D. (2016). An
in-depth study of the ICT ecosystem in a South African rural community: unveiling
expenditure and communication patterns. Information Technology for Development Vol. 22
(sup 1). Pp 101-120.
http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155145<http://doi.org/10.1080/0268…
[7] See Declaration on Community Connectivity
http://communityconnectivity.xyz/
[8] See
http://www.networkneutrality.info/
[9] See RFC 8280
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8280#page-40
[10] See
https://commotionwireless.net/docs/cck/
[11] See
http://altermundi.net/
[12] See
http://www.coolab.org/quem-somos/
[13] See
https://guifi.net/en/what_is_guifinet
[14] See Baig, R., Roca, R., Freitag, F., Navarro L. (2015).
Guifi.net, a Crowdsourced
Network Infrastructure Held in Common. In Computer Networks. N° 90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.009
[15] A complete list of services developed by the
Guifi.net community can be found at
https://guifi.net/en/node/3671/view/services
[16] See Belli L. (Ed.) (2017). Community networks: the Internet by the people, for the
people. Official Outcome of the UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity. FGV
Direito Rio.
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19401
[17] See RFC 1958
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1958
[18] See Bobbio N. (1990). L'età dei diritti.
[FGV Direito Rio]
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/>
luca.belli@fgv.br<mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>
+55 21 3799 5763
@1lucabelli<https://twitter.com/1lucabelli>
[
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]
________________________________
________________________________
[1] See
http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016
[2] See Belli L. (2017). Network Self-Determination and the Positive Externalities of
Community Networks.
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19924
[3] See RFC 8280
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8280#page-40
[4] See
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7962.txt
[5] See
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017…
[6] See e.g. Rey-Moreno, C., Blignaut, R., May, J., & Tucker, W. D. (2016). An
in-depth study of the ICT ecosystem in a South African rural community: unveiling
expenditure and communication patterns. Information Technology for Development Vol. 22
(sup 1). Pp 101-120.
http://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155145
[7] See Declaration on Community Connectivity
http://communityconnectivity.xyz/
[8] See
http://www.networkneutrality.info/
[9] See RFC 8280
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8280#page-40
[10] See
https://commotionwireless.net/docs/cck/
[11] See
http://altermundi.net/
[12] See
http://www.coolab.org/quem-somos/
[13] See
https://guifi.net/en/what_is_guifinet
[14] See Baig, R., Roca, R., Freitag, F., Navarro L. (2015).
Guifi.net, a Crowdsourced
Network Infrastructure Held in Common. In Computer Networks. N° 90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.009
[15] A complete list of services developed by the
Guifi.net community can be found at
https://guifi.net/en/node/3671/view/services
[16] See Belli L. (Ed.) (2017). Community networks: the Internet by the people, for the
people. Official Outcome of the UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity. FGV
Direito Rio.
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19401
[17] See RFC 1958
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1958
[18] See Bobbio N. (1990). L'età dei diritti.