On December 18, 2016 11:37:58 AM CST, Raoul Plommer <plommer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ideally, the website will be our
"observatory". We should gather all
research there, once it's up and running. In the meantime, we should
make a
virtual pad for it, to avoid trawling emails all over again.
In practice, the website will be the repository of our outcomes, but an observatory is a
group of people that is continuously looking for and classifying information about a
certain topic... And we don't have that.
-Raoul
-
On Dec 18, 2016 10:55, "Nicolas" <nico(a)libre.ws> wrote:
Awesome Leandro.
So... this proposal was born in the context of many conversations
around the University of Guadalajara.
We have met many researchers that may be interested to collaborate
with
us, but we need to do a little bit of extra
effort to have them on
board.
What I feel we need to do is to encourage them to touch topics that
they were not used to touch, and that could happen on a place (like a
mailing list) were we can stimulate them for that.
Do you have any idea on how we can do this?
And now that I know the many initiatives around, do we have an
Observatory of our field so we can have all this researches together
and show the interest that the research movement have on our field?
Regards,
On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 16:33 +0100, Leandro Navarro wrote:
> On 17/12/16 14:54, Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Maureen and I have been having many interesting meetings this
week
> > in
> > Guadalajara (and we will share the outcomes shortly).
> > One thing we saw was that there are many people on the academic
> > sector
> > that share our vision and want to contribute by doing research
> > papers
> > on our field.
> >
> > What do you think about building a group that gets together all
our
> > existing research fellows, where we can
start adding people?
>
> Hi, my opinion is that this already exists in a wider scope, the
> ICT4D
> community. One example is the excellent work IPID is doing for so
> many
> years:
http://groupspaces.com/ipid
> Regarding academic conferences (and communities around), we have
>
http://acmdev.org/ for the more technology oriented, and
>
http://ictd2017.itu.edu.pk/ for the more interdisciplinary.
> For instance the ACMDEV 2015 had several papers about community
> networks, and the best paper award was given to one about WISPs
from
> U
> Berkeley:
http://dev6.acmdev.org/program.php
>
> There are also very relevant academic journals. One is " The
Journal
> of
> Community Informatics". For instance this special issue:
>
http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/issue/view/54 is very nice.
> You'll
> see familiar names there.
>
> A lesson learned (not only for me) is that research in ICT4D
requires
> recognized forums that can promote
high-quality complementary
> collaborations and publications, that can be competitive and
compared
> under normal academic quality metrics. That
can enable research
> careers
> in these areas, visibility and research impact, which are long-term
> critical issues. For these reasons, I find more effective and
> sustainable to join and contribute to reinforce existing
established
and
slightly wider-scope research communities.
Regards, Leandro.
Would that benefit our process?
Regards,
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.