It is good to keep the ITU informed, but this
can't lead to a situation
 where ITU gains total legitimacy over all policy related to community
 networks, which might place the ITU in a position to influence all
 decisions, some of which might cause the policy makers to go slow on
 Community Networks... (Sorry, I find it difficult to trust the influences
 weighing in on ITU)
 On Thu, May 28, 2020, 19:10 gphlilanthi <gphlilanthi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
  I hear G20 are supporting CN. Does anyone know of
any specifics
 regarding this policy please?
 Regards AmalI De Silva-Mitchell
 Sent from my Galaxy Tab A (2016)
 -------- Original message --------
 From: Carlos <carlos(a)apc.org>
 Date: 27/05/2020 22:20 (GMT-08:00)
 To: dc3 <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
 Subject: [DC3] ITU Council seeking input on how Community Networks
 increase Internet connectivity
 Hi everyone,
 After all the noise some of us have made at national, regional and
 international Internet Governance spaces, it looks like the ITU Council
 wants to hear directly “How can small/community/non-profit operators
 help in promoting the increase of Internet connectivity?”
 This poses an unique opportunity to showcase directly to the ITU Council
 all the amazing work that most of you are doing, specially at times
 where CNs are gaining more and more visibility to curve the digital
 divide and rural marginalization that is now more and more apparent due
 to the pandemic. And I say directly because this request is made through
 one of the very few consultations the ITU open to all stakeholders: the
 Open Public Consultation of the Council Working Group on International
 Internet-related Public Policy Issues (CWG-Internet). I provide a bit of
 background about it below for those who are interested.
 The consultation is structured as a set of questions, one of them the
 one included above, available in the following link:
 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-sep2020.aspx
 where you can also find important information and instructions on the
 submission process.
 I think it is strategically important that the ITU receives as many
 contributions from each of us as possible highlighting the many
 different ways community operators help in promoting the increase of
 Internet connectivity. This will surely contribute in creating a more
 policy and regulatory environment for community networks in each of your
 countries.
 I’ve copied some of the basic instructions to participate below.
 Participating can be as easy as forwarding existing text you may have
 written (the GISWatch country report for those of you who wrote it:
 
https://www.giswatch.org/community-networks) to the email address below.
 Note that your online submission can be drafted in a UN language other
 than English (these are Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish),
 but you are encouraged (not obliged) to provide a translation in English
 for the benefit of all readers.
 At APC we are available to provide support to any of you wanting to make
 a submission but struggling with the process. Please do not hesitate to
 reach out to me directly.
 Best,
 carlos
 == Basic instructions ==
 You can include your responses to the questions into the online form in
 the following link :
 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/form-oct2019.aspx OR
 send it to InternetPublicViews(a)itu.int including your Full Name, Title,
 Country and Organization you are representing.
 Your response will then be published on the ITU Website:
 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-sep2020.aspx
 Please include each submission also includes a short summary/abstract
 (1-3 paragraphs). This will form part of the final summary document to
 be published after the end of the physical open consultation meeting.
 == Background ==
 ITU Council Working Groups
 There are different Working Groups set up to provide input to the ITU
 Council in different matters. In the last last Council Group (February,
 2020) meeting four appeared to be active [1]:
 - Council Working Group on International Internet-related Public Policy
 Issues (CWG-Internet)
 - Council working group on Child Online Protection (WG-CP)
 - Council Working Group on WSIS (WG-WSIS)
 - Council Working Group on Financial and Human Resources (CWG-FHR)
 The participation in those working groups varies and some are for
 Members States (MS) only, others allow for the participation of Sector
 Members (too).
 CWG-Internet is limited to Member States, but they hold an open
 consultation to all stakeholders. This poses one of the few
 opportunities for Civil Society Organizations that are not Sector
 Members of the ITU to present their views to the ITU Council. In most
 other ITU’s consultations, organizations such as the Association for
 Progressive Communications and the Internet Society, both with Sector
 Member status do their best to bring the voice of the Civil Society in
 general, and of community networks in particular to these spaces.
 In particular, CWG-Internet is tasked to identify, study and develop
 matters related to international Internet-related public policy issues
 and to disseminate its outputs throughout ITU's membership, as well as
 to report annually to the Council on activities undertaken on these
 subjects [2] [3].
 The 13th Session of the ITU Council Working Group on International
 Internet-related Public Policy Issues (CWG-Internet) decided on 20
 September 2019 to hold an open consultation (online and physical) on
 “International internet-related public policy issues on harnessing new
 and emerging telecommunications/ICTs for sustainable development” where
 some of our contributions provided already content in relation to
 community connectivity [4].
 In the 13th Session it was also decided that the next round of Open
 Consultations (February 2020 – August 2020), on the topic of “Expanding
 Internet Connectivity” with the questions below: [5]
 Expanding Internet Connectivity
 - What are the challenges and opportunities for expanding Internet
 connectivity, particularly to remote and under-served areas? What are
 the roles of governments and non-government actors in overcoming these
 challenges?
 - Are there particular challenges facing land-locked countries in
 securing affordable Internet access? What can be done to overcome these
 challenges?
 - How can small/community/non-profit operators help in promoting the
 increase of Internet connectivity?
 [1] 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/Pages/groups.aspx
 [2] 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/default.aspx
 [3] 
https://www.itu.int/md/S19-CL-C-0136/en
 [4]
 
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-oct2019.aspx
 [5]
 
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/19/rclintpol13/c/S19-RCLINTPOL13-C-001…
 --
 Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
 Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
 Association for Progressive Communications
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-…
 Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
 Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
 _______________________________________________
 DC3 mailing list
 DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
 
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
 _______________________________________________
 DC3 mailing list
 DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
 
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
  _______________________________________________
 DC3 mailing list
 DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net