Am 11. November 2018 23:06:19 OEZ schrieb Quiliro Ordonez <quiliro(a)riseup.net>et>:
Hello all:
Congratulations for the document. Please provide the link for the
digital version when it is available. I hope it is free and not only
gratis.
Dear Maureen:
Regarding your comment...
El 2018-11-09 05:53, Maureen Hernandez escribió:
I often work with [...] which is a free visual
editor, web-based with
many templates allowing for all of us with no decent design
skills to
appear less clumsy on that matter.
I would like to give some information about this software.
I suggest to avoid it because it is non-free software. This is what
their website says:
ARE YOUR LICENSES STILL THE SAME?
-------------------------
We're introducing a new license for [...] 2.0 users, called the One
Design Use
license. This license is similar to the old One-time use
license, but there is no 24 hour limit on use. You can continue to use
and export the media you have licensed multiple times provided it is
only used within the one design and you otherwise comply with the terms
of the license.
And also this:
ANY WORK CREATED IN CANVA CANNOT BE TRADEMARKED
or limited to your
brand or team.
And many other draconian terms specified in:
https://about.canva.com/license-agreements/
https://about.canva.com/terms-of-use/
So, it is not free software. Software which is gratis (no cost) and/or
web-based (if it is not hosted on machines that you control) subjugates
and divides its users. Hence it is not good however ease or
functionality it may have. (I can give more information on this if you
need it.) Even if a software has less functionality, is difficult or
costs more, it is always better to choose freedom over those other
illusions of "good". If you decide to use it or promote it, please
consider this and inform your audience about these problems.
I have little experience with design software. But a quick search on
directory.fsf.org shows these free softwares:
GIMP
Blender
MyPaint
Inkscape with Darktable
Tux Paint
Heck, it is possible to make a flyer with Libre Office.
My personal choice is the most difficult and less graphical, even if
the
learning curve is steeper. Why?:
- More power
- More knowledge of how to do more things with it in the future
- Less clutter
- Works on the oldest computer
- If I am interested enough, I can learn how to modify it to do other
things I need
- Available for more operating systems
- Not all functionality that a software has is available with the icons
on the graphical interface
- Personalization of configuration for repetitive uses
So if I would be willing to make a flyer, I would not make it now. I
would take a month or more to learn the most difficult but functional
and free (as in freedom, of course) software, without caring about the
monetary cost as long as I could afford it. If I would need the flyer
now (as apparently is the case in this thread), I would rather ask a
friend to do it with free software or pay someone to do it with free
software. My last choice would be to ask someone to do it with non free
software just for this time, until I can learn or find someone to do it
with free software.
Learning anything is easy...it just takes more time and persistence for
more complex stuff. But it pays! (It pays in money too. But I did not
mean that.)
My software choice would be one which works on a text-only interface
and
without mouse. Perhaps I'd find a way with Emacs. This would not have
been my decision fifteen years ago. It would have been the opposite.
Freedom is more important than any other consideration because it is a
better decision on the long run. Using free software is not a decision
for poor or practical people. CHOOSING FREE SOFTWARE IS A DECISION OF
SMART AND PRUDENT HUMAN BEINGS.
Maureen: Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to show this
information about free software. Please do not feel offended. I have
done this with the sole intention of helping you. If it is not useful,
please disregard it.
Saluton,
Quiliro
this is one symptom of a widespread phenomenon that "keeps women from speaking up and
from being heard when they dare; that crushes young women into silence by indicating, the
way harassment on the street does, that this is not their world. It trains us in
self-doubt and self-limitation just as it exercises men's unsupported
overconfidence."
with the sincere desire that this mailing list does not contribute to that phenomenon,
Gui
ps. replies on this offtopic welcome but off the list