I'm not sure what this is exactly in reference to but there is a fine point
in the need to be careful to say "free to use" rather than gratis. We need
to acknowledge that the facilities have to be paid for. We're just looking
for a way to pay for them which doesn't compromise the larger societal needs
be they social (access) or technical (supported connectivity). And a way to
implement connectivity which doesn't put a gatekeeper in the path (social --
deciding who can speak, technical - frustrating transparent edge-to-edge
connectivity).
I'm hoping to post
http://rmf.vc/Infrastructureconnected soon -- any
feedback on the draft is appreciated.
Bob Frankston
http://Frankston.com
-----Original Message-----
From: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] On Behalf Of Quiliro Ordonez
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 15:31
To: dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
Subject: Re: [DC3] Elaboration of a Declaration of Principles and Good
Practices on Community Connectivity
An isp could possibly assume all benefits for itself and discharge all costs
to community. I think that the best is to make it totally gratis.
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3