Hi all,
Below, some ideas regarding the IGF.
a) Workshop proposal. Very happy to participate, help drafting and even being a
co-organiser (as CTS/FGV). My proposal is to try some sort of catchy title. For instance
“Community Connectivity or How to Sustainably Connect the Unconnected” of something along
these lines. I am gonna add the title proposal on the pad shared by Nico (thanks Nico for
creating the pad!)
b) DC3 Session. The deadline to provide your comments on the draft DC3 Call for Papers
is on 20 May.
I will share the consolidated version next week, so that we can circulate it via our
networks. Everyone is invited to participate to the CfP submitting short papers describing
your projects etc. (Note that having a paper to present at the IGF is usually a very good
argument when looking for grants to attend the IGF)
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/DRAFT_Call_for_Papers_DC3
c) Best Practice Forum. I had an email exchange with the IGF Secretariat and it may be
difficult to establish a BPF in a couple of weeks due to many requirements, amogst which
MAG approval that, apparently, are necessary. (see IGF Secretariat’s explanation below)
However, this does not mean that we cannot compile good practices. Indeed we can use the
IGF website platform for DC outcomes development that was already used last year (see
http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/dynamic-coalitions/ ) to compile good practices on
CN. One of our main goals is indeed to compile good practices. The result would be exactly
the same and we can start with to need for MAG approval! ;)
Best
Luca
BPF explanation from the IGF Secretariat:
-Topics for BPFs arise from discussions among the MAG, generally during their first
face-to-face meeting in the annual IGF cycle.
-During the discussion, suggestions are fielded from the floor and they do not necessarily
have to come from MAG members (MAG meetings are all open to non-members). But they do have
to have loose MAG consensus and approval from the Chair in order for their moving forward
to be "formalized" and for the BPF to be established.
-This is quite important: a focal point from the Secretariat, a staff member or consultant
hired by UNDESA for that purpose, always holds the pen on a BPF output. The contributors
to the BPF are varied - they are experts on the topic from any stakeholder group - but the
task of writing a final draft and cobbling together inputs/contributions rests with the
Secretariat. There has been an established practice of appointing a MAG coordinator for
each BPF and they act as a co-organizer and help rally the experts. But this of course is
voluntary work, whereas the production of the written output has either a salaried staff
member or one-time paid consultant behind it.
-Although this may change in the future, BPF work until now has followed the cyclical,
annual IGF timeline. So in effect, work is supposed to start at the beginning of the year
and culminate with the annual meeting.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net [mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] Em nome
de Nicolás Echániz
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 18 de maio de 2016 17:23
Para: Carlos Afonso <ca(a)cafonso.ca>ca>; DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
Cc: Mike Jensen <lankamike(a)gmail.com>
Assunto: Re: [DC3] IGF 2016 participation
On 05/18/2016 02:06 PM, Carlos Afonso wrote:
If agreed, I guess we need volunteers to do the job of
writing up the
proposal. Deadline (MAG does not plan to extend it): June 6th, 2016.
More info on workshops for 2016:
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf16-workshops
If the community decides to do it, I think APC (Mike?), Nupef and
CGI.br could be listed as co-organizers or supporters, as you wish. I
guess it would be ideal if the leading organizer (for the purpose of
the application at least) were Rhizomatica, since it is Mexico-based
and very successful on the theme. Does not imply funding of course,
but at least to comply with the formality of quoting organizations'
involvement to strengthen the proposal.
I agree it would be important to hold a workshop during the next IGF.
It's the first IGF edition since we started with the DC3.
Maybe after this we can decide if a BPF makes sense for the future or not.
Do we already know whom of us will be traveling to Mexico for the IGF?
We also need to assess what are the travel funding possibilities we have. In our case
(AlterMundi), we are willing to participate but we'll need to cover the airfare
somehow.
Afonso, I've started a PAD so we can write collectively there:
https://pad.codigosur.org/IGF2016_DC3-workshop
I've pasted the proposal you sent so we can use it as a reference and template.
Regarding Rhizomatica, I think they haven't subscribed to this list...
Or at least I don't recognize their e-mail addresses.
If you wish to invite them to do so, please go ahead!
Cheers,
Nico
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3