Hi Ritu,
Thanks for this. I just wanted to clarify that we are going to compile good practices on
CN using the IGF platform but, as I pointed out in my email of 18/5, this compilation
cannot be officially considered as a Best Practice Forum, because the establishment of a
BPF requires several bureaucratic requirements that cannot be fulfilled at this stage. (I
am copying below the IGF Secretariat explanation on BPF)
We can use the IGF website platform for DC outcomes to compile best practices but the
compilation will be classified as a DC outcome rather than a BPF outcome.
Hope my explanation makes things clearer.
Best
Luca
BPF explanation from the IGF Secretariat:
-Topics for BPFs arise from discussions among the MAG, generally during their first
face-to-face meeting in the annual IGF cycle.
-During the discussion, suggestions are fielded from the floor and they do not necessarily
have to come from MAG members (MAG meetings are all open to non-members). But they do have
to have loose MAG consensus and approval from the Chair in order for their moving forward
to be "formalized" and for the BPF to be established.
-This is quite important: a focal point from the Secretariat, a staff member or consultant
hired by UNDESA for that purpose, always holds the pen on a BPF output. The contributors
to the BPF are varied - they are experts on the topic from any stakeholder group - but the
task of writing a final draft and cobbling together inputs/contributions rests with the
Secretariat. There has been an established practice of appointing a MAG coordinator for
each BPF and they act as a co-organizer and help rally the experts. But this of course is
voluntary work, whereas the production of the written output has either a salaried staff
member or one-time paid consultant behind it.
-Although this may change in the future, BPF work until now has followed the cyclical,
annual IGF timeline. So in effect, work is supposed to start at the beginning of the year
and culminate with the annual meeting.
De: Ritu Srivastava [mailto:ritu.sri@defindia.net]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 25 de maio de 2016 01:32
Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>et>; Luca
Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>
Assunto: Re: [DC3] RES: IGF 2016 participation
I would be interested to be part of best practices forum at IGF.
regards
ritu
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Luca Belli
<luca.belli@fgv.br<mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>> wrote:
Hi Nicolas and all,
I have created another pad for the workshop proposal because I had some serious technical
problems using the original pad (when writing, letters appeared in the middle of previous
words..)
I copied and pasted your proposal and made some modifications/tweaks. Please add your
suggestions and specify if you want to be a panelist, co-organiser or rapporteur BY THE
END OF THE WEEK
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/DC3_Workshop_Proposal_IGF_2016
Also, I compiled all the suggestions in the attached DC3 Call for papers. Please, let me
know if I have missed anything. If everything is fine we can share it. (I put my email
address as a recipient of the submissions because we do not have an official DC3 email
address yet)
Lastly, today I spoke with the IGF Secretariat and they confirmed we can use the
collaborative platform of the IGF website to compile good practices and propose common
principles. I will ask to set up the platform as soon as we define a calendar for the good
practice compilation/principles elaboration.
All the best
Luca
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV
+55 21 3799 5763<tel:%2B55%2021%203799%205763>
-----Mensagem original-----
De: dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>]
Em nome de Nicolás Echániz
Enviada em: domingo, 22 de maio de 2016 12:59
Para: DC3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
Assunto: Re: [DC3] IGF 2016 participation
(si alguien prefiere escribir en su idioma para la propuesta y que lo traduzcamos,
adelante!)
If anyone prefers to write in their own language for the proposal, please go ahead. We can
then translate it.
On 05/19/2016 07:22 AM, Carlos Afonso wrote:
Thanks, Nico! I will wait for initial contributions
from list members,
I guess I intervened too much already :-) Just reminding everyone
deadline for a workshop proposal é June 6.
And sorry for the duplicate message.
Ok, I've added some text:
https://pad.codigosur.org/IGF2016_DC3-workshop
Please feel free to delete/edit/replace it all :)
It's just intended to get this rolling; we don't have much time.
Abrazos,
Nico
PS: Afonso your intervention is in no way too much IMHO
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
With warm regards,
------------------------------------
Ritu Srivastava
Senior Programme Manager
Digital Empowerment Foundation (DEF)
44, III Floor, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi-110016, India
Contact Details:
O: 011-26532786 / 26532787
M: +91-9999369624<tel:%2B91-9999369624>
Email Id: ritu@defindia.net<mailto:ritu@defindia.net>
[
https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B16Z5UN8cyebNUg1dkw4WHhi…]
The “Internet Rights” is an initiative through which DEF is consistently making an effort
to make Internet as a medium to reach the masses, to create even opportunities and
linkages between haves and have-nots so that the grassroots knowledge reaches the economic
prosperity and vice-versa through information communication technology and digital
media.
Join DEF's Internet Rights page at
https://www.facebook.com/InternetRights;
Website:
http://www.internetrights.in/;