Hi all,
I've been an observer on this group for a few months now and have been
amazed by the breadth of the discussions. This seems like a good time to
introduce myself.
My name is Sharada Srinivasan, and I'm a research fellow at the Center
for Technology, Innovation and Competition at the University of
Pennsylvania. I have a bachelor's degree in electrical and electronics
engineering and a master's degree in public policy, both from
universities in India. I work on a research project called 1 World
Connected, which, as Carlos and Jane have mentioned, is seeking to
develop case studies of different projects across the world that are
engaged in connecting the unconnected. I do so by desk research and
where possible, conducting interviews with pioneers of such projects.
Community networks are one of our areas of focus, but the project also
looks at other supply-side solutions such as TVWS deployments and rural
ISPs, as well as demand-side initiatives such as those focused on
digital literacy and local content development. We have an initial
catalog of all such initiatives that we want to build case studies of
over here:
https://goo.gl/rZLsWN, and I am working steadily to build
this out over the course of the next year. Indeed, you will notice that
a number of the initiatives on the list are community networks, and I
look forward to engaging with people on this list for the same at the IGF.
I'm amused by the column "Demand/Supply", I think that's a good
example
that gives this feeling about difference of perspectives ;)
I mean, at least some of the community networks listed (that I know,
like
, funkfeuer, freifunk) would not consider themselves
simple "Suppliers", or in the best case "demanders that are supplying
themselves", promoting local contents and such. So they would be on both
sides of that question.
But in general, the research project doesn't sound narrow-minded at all,
so I imagine you'll have fruitful exchanges with the DC3
Cheers!
Gui
I am one of the members of the Dynamic Coalition on Innovative
Approaches to Connecting the Unconnected. Professor Christopher Yoo,
Helani Galpaya, Michael Kende and Rajan Mathews are the primary
convenors of the dynamic coalition. I thought it might be useful to
clarify here that the dynamic coalition from what I am aware of is aimed
to be a lot broader than the specific research project and seeks to work
with and gain input from as many members of the community as possible.
Our case study work from the project feeds into the DC, and the excel
sheet of projects we can cover is also open for input from the wider
community (and has been shared on our DC mailing list, as well as
others). The project is a time-limited one, we are hoping that the DC
will remain as a forum for discussion and communication on these
initiatives long after our project captures snapshots of work at a
specific moment in time. So far through the DC, I have received input on
sources to include and mine for case studies via the mailing list and
input on literature I may not have yet read.
In response to Bob's question on metrics - we are waiting for more data
to come in through case studies before fully crystallising our next
stages in research. The case study development process has been shedding
light on what kind of data is available on various connectivity projects
right now, whether there are monitoring and evaluation techniques that
are already in place, and how we should think about the same.
I look forward to meeting you all at the IGF, and learning from the DC3
session as well as hopefully meeting you all in person as well.
Regards,
Sharada Srinivasan
Research Fellow
Center for Technology, Innovation and Competition,
University of Pennsylvania.
On 17 November 2016 at 08:03, Bob Frankston
<Bob19-0501(a)bobf.frankston.com <mailto:Bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com>>
wrote:
I share your concerns. I did get a chance to speak to Michael Kende
at IGF last year and felt that he was able to get a sense of
connectivity outside of the traditional framing. But, overall, the
sense is that, indeed, they are accepting the traditional idea that
the Internet is basically just another telecom service and a series
of (water) pipes rather than a new infrastructure. When I see
mention of cost/benefit I wonder what metrics they are assuming.____
__ __
*From:*dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>] *On Behalf Of *Raoul Plommer
*Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2016 02:13
*To:* Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>>
*Subject:* Re: [DC3] Dynamic Coalition on Innovative Approaches to
Connecting the Unconnected____
__ __
Very interesting Nico. We'll have to keep a close eye on them and
see that they are exposed in the way they should be.
It really feels like they're stealing our thunder and making it
profitable for those mega-corporations, instead of just giving
people free access. We'd really want some person to maintain the
database of networks and their solutions, once the material starts
coming in. I wonder, if we'd actually be able to use some of their
research and data for our more benevolent project.
-Raoul____
__ __
On 17 November 2016 at 09:04, Nicolás Echániz
<nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net <mailto:nicoechaniz@altermundi.net>>
wrote:____
On 11/17/2016 03:45 AM, Raoul Plommer wrote:
"We collate information from different
sources, organize and
synthesize
them using academic standards, and provide this
information in
an easy,
searchable and digestible form. Our commitment to
academic
standards, as
well as the fact that we are the first such
initiative to make
an effort
to compile such information, makes our work
complementary to
the number
of ongoing efforts."
Well, I'll be damned. We obviously need to work together.
Well I wouldn't go that far :)
I see Facebook, Verizon, World Economic Forum as Dynamic
Coalition Speakers here:
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/igf-meeting/igf-2016/910-dc-connec…
<http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/igf-meeting/igf-2016/910-dc-connecting-the-unconnected-igf2016session/file>
and it makes me think: we can maybe share some work, but I don't
exactly imagine us working together as in with a common perspective.
I've been invited to a WEF organized event in Buenos Aires a
week ago framed in the Global Connect Initiative and the
Internet For All program. I can assure you there was almost no
one there sharing perspectives with most of the people I know
from our DC3. Lots of big telecos, banks, credit card companies,
etc. The words may sound similar but the focus is very different.
I guess it will be interesting to see what this Dynamnic
Coalition will actually be working on in the future.
Cheers,____
Nico
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
<https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3>____
__ __
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
<https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3>
--
Sharada
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3