Hi All
I agree!
As we are talking about simplest and low cost technology but with effective
solution especially about connecting communities and providing them
connectivity.
Regards
ritu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Leandro Navarro <leandro(a)pangea.org>
wrote:
Hi all,
On 18/11/15 19:08, Luca Belli wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that I missed Ritu’s and Parminder’s emails. My apologies.
So, we now have 4 co-coordinators including Nico, myself, Ritu and
Parminder. This is excellent, as we also diversify georgapgically.
Also, Parminder raised the issue of the name of the DC. So far, the
proposal was DC on Connected Communities but Parminder proposes DC on
Community Broadband.
My preference would be to keep the original proposal precisely because it
is more comprehensive. Broadband is an option of connectivity (broad
bandwidth) and the very definition of what may be considered as ‘broad’ is
not universal. It rather depends on national standards. Also, I think
that DC on Connected Communities has the merit on focusing on people and
stressing the importance/role of communities.
What do others think?
I agree with your point. The EC has also a program on connected
communities as it focuses on people, their local communities, and
socio-economic factors.
Broadband sounds to me quite techie old/traditional/engineering term, hard
to explain to my daughter (not succeeded yet). Instead of simply
connectivity, it resonates with radio and frequency and spectrum, speed or
other measures of quality of access, QoE. In Europe we start to discuss
about what is the criteria to qualify for broadband (>30Mbps, symmetric?,
latency, etc).
Best regards, Leandro.
All the best
Luca
------------------------------
*De:* parminder [parminder.js(a)gmail.com]
*Enviado:* quarta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2015 15:13
*Para:* Luca Belli
*Assunto:* Fwd: Re: Future IGF Dynamic Coalition on Connected Communities
Luca
It seems you did not receive this expression of interest and a few
questions.... So resending from gmail id... parminder
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Future IGF Dynamic
Coalition on Connected Communities Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:15:39 +0530 From:
parminder <parminder(a)itforchange.net> <parminder(a)itforchange.net> To: Luca
Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br> <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>br>,
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>et>,
<bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com>bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com
<bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com><bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com>
<bob19-0501(a)bobf.frankston.com>om>, <lee.hibbard@coe.int>lee.hibbard@coe.int
<lee.hibbard@coe.int><lee.hibbard@coe.int> <lee.hibbard(a)coe.int>nt>,
Jamila
Rodrigues Venturini <jamila.venturini(a)fgv.br> <jamila.venturini(a)fgv.br>br>,
<ritu.sri@defindia.net>ritu.sri@defindia.net <ritu.sri(a)defindia.net>
<ritu.sri(a)defindia.net> <ritu.sri(a)defindia.net>et>,
<otavio.vinhas(a)gmail.com>
otavio.vinhas(a)gmail.com <otavio.vinhas@gmail.com><otavio.vinhas@gmail.com>
<otavio.vinhas(a)gmail.com>om>, <catherine.middleton(a)ryerson.ca>
catherine.middleton(a)ryerson.ca <catherine.middleton(a)ryerson.ca>
<catherine.middleton(a)ryerson.ca> <catherine.middleton(a)ryerson.ca>ca>,
<janara.sousa@gmail.com>janara.sousa@gmail.com <janara.sousa(a)gmail.com>
<janara.sousa(a)gmail.com> <janara.sousa(a)gmail.com>om>,
<edliano(a)hotmail.com>
edliano(a)hotmail.com <edliano@hotmail.com><edliano@hotmail.com>
<edliano(a)hotmail.com>om>, <plommer@gmail.com>plommer@gmail.com
<plommer(a)gmail.com> <plommer(a)gmail.com>om>,
<donck@isoc.org>donck@isoc.org
<donck(a)isoc.org> <donck(a)isoc.org>rg>, <vicentin(a)riseup.net>
vicentin(a)riseup.net <vicentin@riseup.net><vicentin@riseup.net>
<vicentin(a)riseup.net>et>, <yzdrrr@riseup.net>yzdrrr@riseup.net
<yzdrrr(a)riseup.net> <yzdrrr(a)riseup.net>et>, <bankston(a)newamerica.org>
bankston(a)newamerica.org <bankston@newamerica.org><bankston@newamerica.org>
<bankston(a)newamerica.org>rg>, <foditsch@gmail.com>foditsch@gmail.com
<foditsch@gmail.com><foditsch@gmail.com> <foditsch(a)gmail.com> CC:
nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net <nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net>
<nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net>
Luca
I am happy to work with you on this, including if required with
co-coordination.... In fact as a part of our current work on community
braodband in India we have been proposing a coalition on community
broadband and developing countries.... But this could be that space.
Is there scope for discussing the name of proposed DC... I find connected
communities a bit vague, and I think community broadband is rather more to
the point. Connected communities connotes a much larger scop area, the kind
of work for instance that we do in community informatics, and I am not sure
we want the DC to spread itself that thin. In doing so it will lose focus
form what independently is a very distinct and extremely important area of
practise and policy right now.
Other issue also is the role of private sector in this DC, hich
unfortunately in the IGF space means big business and who are of course not
at all well inclined to the very idea of community ownership of networks.
In my conceptions of such ownership there is scope for private businesses
working at the local level for actual implementations, although not
necessarily. It depends on what model of community ownership different
communities chose. But then in any case that private sector is never going
to be able to reach the IGF spaces...
Look forward to hear yours and other people's comments on this.
parminder
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 02:08 AM, Luca Belli wrote:
Dear all,
I hope you had nice trips back home after the IGF. (apologies for the long
email)
This is the first email to organise the future work of the IGF Dynamic
Coalition on Connected Communities.
First of all a couple of words on what are IGF Dynamic Coalitions (DCs).
Along workshops, DCs represent the structural elements of the IGF: they
are self-organised, issue-specific groups comprising members of various
stakeholder groups.
The requirements for formulating a Dynamic Coalition:
· An Action Plan
· A mailing list
· The contact person
· Representatives from at least three stakeholder
groups (i.e. Civil society; Private sector; Technical community; Academic
community; Governments; Intergovernmental organisations)
· Setting up a webpage or a blog is highly
recommended.
After the IGF workshop on Community Networks, you expressed your interest
for the initiative. This email is to start discussing together how to shape
our action plan.
I have prepared this pad, so that everyone can make suggestions on what
points should we focus on
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/dc_on_connected_communities
<https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/dc_on_connected_communities>
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/dc_on_connected_communities
Our goals could be the following (please do not hesitate to modify using
the pad):
- Identify good open-access readings that may be useful to communicate
to non-techies what CN are and how do they work;
- Mapping existing CN and try to foster communication amongst them;
- Identify models of CN (e.g. rural CN, urban CN, etc.) and best
practices that can make them particularly efficient and resilient both from
a technical and organisational perspective;
- Identify best practices and worst practices as regards national
policies that facilitate or hinder the deployment of community networks.
- Consolidate and publish all this ideas into some ‘Community Network
Guidelines/Best practices’ to be presented at the next IGF and divulgated
on the future DC3 website.
Thanks to Nicolas, we already have a mailing-list! (many thanks
Nicolas!!!)
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
Besides English, I think it would be fair to allow people to communicate
in Spanish or Portuguese in order to be as inclusive as possible. What do
you think?
The following persons expressed their interest in the DC3 (feel free to
state to which IGF stakeholder group you would like to be associated):
· Bob Frankston
· Nicolás Echániz
· Ritu Srivastava
· Janara Sousa
· Otavio Vinhas
· Catherine Middleton
· <plommer@gmail.com>plommer@gmail.com please state your name J
· <edliano@hotmail.com>edliano@hotmail.com please state your name
J
· Lee Hibbard
· Frédéric Donck
· Diego Vicentin
· Nathalia Foditsch
· <yzdrrr@riseup.net>yzdrrr@riseup.net also please state your
name J
· Luca Belli
· Jamila Venturini
· Kevin Bankston
I would be honoured to act as contact person/coordinator and I would love
if anyone else wanted to share this task with me as co-coordinator(s).
Just to provide some info regarding myself, I have been participating to
the IGF over the past 5 years, I have worked for the IGF Secretariat and I
have funded/coordinated two DCs (DC on Net Neutrality and on Platform
Responsibility). I was previously working for the Council of Europe
Internet Governance Unit and I am now researcher at Center for Technology
and Society at FGV, Rio de Janeiro. My work is to produce research advising
policy people on how to take sustainable decisions.
I look forward to hearing from you and feel free to share this email.
All the best,
Luca
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing
listDC3@listas.altermundi.nethttps://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
With warm regards,
------------------------------------
*Ritu Srivastava*
Senior Programme Manager
Digital Empowerment Foundation (DEF)
44, III Floor, Kalu Sarai, New Delhi-110016, India
*Contact Details:*
O: 011-26532786 / 26532787
M: +91-9999369624
Email Id: ritu(a)defindia.net
The “Internet Rights” is an initiative through which DEF is consistently
making an effort to make Internet as a medium to reach the masses, to
create even opportunities and linkages between haves and have-nots so that
the grassroots knowledge reaches the economic prosperity and vice-versa
through information communication technology and digital media.
Join DEF's Internet Rights page at