ecosystem can fill the comercial stakeholder seat.
Leandro, Roger, do you think people doing business within the network as a commons could
be interested in participating?
cheers,
Nico
ps: comercial doesn't mean it needs to be a big corporation.
On June 22, 2018 4:36:53 PM GMT-03:00, Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br> wrote:
Just another element of clarification
As stated in my inicial email, the IGF Secretariat requests that the
session should be multistakeholder.
This means we should have at least one private-sector repressnetative
and this is precisely why I thought about Google India. But that was a
mere suggestion and the last thing I would like to do is raising any
sensitivities ☺
Another option to have a – potential partner – representing private
sector would be Open Fiber, which is an Italian wholesale connectivity
provider whose model is very intersting and very compatible with CNs
development. They have no vertical integration with content and app and
only provide wholesale bandwith to both urban and rural areas.
Here an article to know more (unfortunately only in Italian but you can
translate it with you favourite online translator ☺)
https://assoprovider.it/perche-open-fiber-modello-wholesale-only-e-5g-sono-…
De: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] Em nome de Luca Belli
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 22 de junho de 2018 16:12
Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Assunto: [DC3] RES: DC3 Digest, Vol 32, Issue 14
Hi Bob and Peter.
Just to clarify. Obviously I was NOT suggesting that Free WiFi and CNs
are the same ting...
That is precisely the resaon why I was suggesting to – potentially –
include a representative from Google India in part 3 of the session,
dedicated to exploring potential interactions/partnerships with
different stakeholders
To be even more explicit, what I had in my mind was the posibility to
consider Google Free WiFi (or other free wifi initiatives) as a
potential source of connectivity for CNs…
De:
dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] Em nome de
dc3@bob.ma<mailto:dc3@bob.ma>
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 22 de junho de 2018 09:23
Para: 'Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity '
<dc3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>>
Assunto: Re: [DC3] DC3 Digest, Vol 32, Issue 14
I see it as not so much free vs. community as whether there is a
sustainable model rather than one dependent upon a benevolent donor. A
donor can play a role in establishing in idea if there is a path
towards communities funding their connectivity be the community very
local or national. The other issue is whether there is spotty coverage
or a path for assuming what I’m calling Ambient Connectivity
everywhere. Finally is this infrastructure or does one have to login
which is what I call web-fi and not full connectivity.
From:
dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
<dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>>
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 08:11
To: dc3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>;
dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net>
Subject: Re: [DC3] DC3 Digest, Vol 32, Issue 14
Hard no on google. Free wifi and community networks are not the same
thing
On June 22, 2018 2:49:38 AM CDT,
dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net>
wrote:
Send DC3 mailing list submissions to
dc3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-request@listas.altermundi.net>
You can reach the person managing the list at
dc3-owner@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3-owner@listas.altermundi.net>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of DC3 digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Planning the DC3 Session (Luca Belli)
2. Re: Planning the DC3 Session (Jane Coffin)
________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:18:53 +0000
From: Luca Belli <luca.belli@fgv.br<mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>>
To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3@listas.altermundi.net<mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>>
Cc: "donna_scheeder@comcast.net<mailto:donna_scheeder@comcast.net>"
<donna_scheeder@comcast.net<mailto:donna_scheeder@comcast.net>>
Subject: [DC3] Planning the DC3 Session
Message-ID:
<4B6296ABAE1FC944984F6C9FE996FE19016B295747@DC6010.fgv.br<mailto:4B6296ABAE1FC944984F6C9FE996FE19016B295747@DC6010.fgv.br>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all,
A further issue we should start discussing is the planning of the DC3
session.
As DC3 has continuously produced outputs, we have a session slot by
default but we should send a draft session proposal by 29 June.
As discussed at
Rightscon<http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_…54>,
the DC3 session could have a threefold structure featuring the
following parts:
1. presentation of (at least some of) the initiatives featured in
the 2018 DC3 Report (that should be the "CN Manual" mentioned in my
previous email)
2. discussion with people in their early phase of CN development
to understand the challenges they are facing
3. discussion with potential partners
FYI, the 90 minutes time slot has been reestablished (thanks to all
those who commented during the IGF stocktaking consultation requesting
restauration of the 90 min slot!!).
The session should be as much as possible, multistakeholder, gender
balanced and geographically diverse.
I propose to have up to 3 speakers in part 1; 2 for part 2; and 2 (or
maybe 3) in part 3.
The speakers for part 1 will be chosen amongst the contributors of the
CN Manual. If anyone is already sure to submit a contribution for the
CN manual, please send a message (on-list or a PM) so that I can
include your name in the DRAFT session description.
As regards part 2, Nico Pace offered to help liaise with people
currently developing CNs and facing challenges. Nico can you suggest
some names?
As regards part 3, I was thinking that IFLA could be good (I am CCing
Donna) and perhaps one Intergovernmental org that is dealing with CNs
e.g. CITEL or African Union.
Lastly, after having read what Google India is doing, providing Free
WiFi at Indian train stations, I have started wondering if it could
also be a potential partner to be included in the discussion
https://qz.com/1300522/googles-free-wifi-at-railway-stations-is-a-way-of-li…
What do you think?
Best
Luca
[FGV Direito Rio]
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/>
luca.belli@fgv.br<mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>
+55 21 3799 5763
@1lucabelli<https://twitter.com/1lucabelli>
[
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]