Re: [DC3] RES: RES: IGF 2016 participation

On 06/03/2016 06:24 PM, Carlos Afonso wrote: +1 to this I added Wilfredo Lopez (Ministerio de Comunicación de Cuba) to the list of proposed speakers. Cheers, Nico roundtable" where a first round of panelists is supposed to present problems that need a solution whilst the second round of panelists will present solutions. Lastly the conversation could move to the discussion of some key recommendations together with all the workshop attendees. paradigm in connecting communities in rural areas; inefficiency of the current spectrum allocation system; etc. while solutions may be various examples of CN success stories; dynamic spectrum management policies; etc. it would be welcomed by MAG. automated messages to confirm their agreement to be included in your proposal, although their confirmation is not required for the proposal to be considered complete and eligible for evaluation." Therefore I think it is NECESSARY to provide the email adress og the proposed speakers. Please add your email address after your name, if you are amongst the proposed panellist. dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net] Em nome de Carlos Afonso dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net> CGI.br whether we can include them as co-organizers. I think this is basically a terminological issue, but below I reproduce the current criteria so you can try and find another category to classify our workshop. event, except for members of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), who evaluate these proposals. There are several types of Workshop Session year, only a set of which can be selected due to space constraints. The MAG evaluates these proposals. Any given proposal may be accepted by the MAG, declined, or the MAG may ask one workshop proposer to collaborate and merge with another workshop proposer if both proposals cover the same material. Workshop Proposals to verify that your proposal has been received for review. at emazzucchi(a)unog.ch , or +41(0)229173678 paper here. session format outlines here. workshop session will explore, and its relevance to the 2016 main theme, Internet Governance Forum: Enabling Inclusive and Sustainable Growth (Max 250 words) (e.g. #privacy, #diversity, #security). For further information and examples of #tags, please click here. description of how stakeholder perspectives will be represented (Note: agreement to be included in your proposal, although their confirmation is not required for the proposal to be considered complete and eligible for evaluation.) workshop is meant to address. Note that this information is collected for programming purposes only, and has no bearing on the MAG’s evaluation of your workshop proposal. provided by the IGF. Organisers should consider monitoring social media feeds/comments in the discussion, and not only allow for, but encourage online participants to intervene, preferably using audio and/or video through WebEx. online moderator must be an integral part of the workshop, technically capable, and work closely with the workshop organiser to develop a clear strategy that includes online participants; ensures that moderators and panellists know how to include online participants on an equal footing with in situ participants; and contains a clear strategy to communicate with online participants and the online moderator to ensure that queues are properly addressed. The online moderator is a critical part of the workshop, not part of the tech support team; therefore, online moderators must also be familiar with the workshop topics and aims. The Remote Participation WG will assist with guidelines and training of online moderators, but cannot provide for online moderators, since this is part of the workshop organisation. Online moderators are required to attend a training session before the IGF. Governance question to be addressed during the workshop and its relationship to the IGF2016 main theme Inclusive and Sustainable Growth, as well as an overview of the agenda and the session format. Proposers should also explain the room set-up and how it will assist participation in light of the proposed format. Please review the available formats here. the rapporteur is to produce a summary report of the workshop session. weeks following the IGF event. If a report is not submitted, then the workshop proposer will not be allowed to submit a workshop proposal for the IGF2017. workshops, the MAG will closely assess all proposals according to the process outlined below. this period, the IGF Secretariat will conduct an initial screening of proposals. Those which do not satisfy the minimum criteria will be declined for MAG consideration. criteria below. 11-15 July. The overall programme will then be finalized. minimum criteria listed below. Proposals that do not satisfy minimum criteria will be declined for MAG consideration. provide a link to this workshop report in their new proposal for IGF2016. Proposals submitted by those who held workshops in the 2014 or declined; proposals. the close of the Call for Proposals. workshop proposals to MAG members for individual evaluation. In evaluating workshop proposals, each MAG member will grade the proposal on a scale from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) based upon the following different stakeholder perspectives will be represented across the participants? preferred over repeat proposers), the debate will be set up, with timings, etc., indicated)? encouraged over the Panel format), disabilities)? (as a general matter, greater diversity is encouraged), interaction with the workshop participants, both online and on-site? obliged to rate a proposal. If a MAG member rates a proposal 3 or below, he or she must provide a reason for doing so, as feedback for the workshop proposers whose workshops are declined. Proposer names will not be given to MAG members when evaluating (anonymous), but indication will be provided if the proposer is from a developing country. the Secretariat will prepare a synthesis of the evaluation for MAG members by 11 July, in preparation for the in-person meeting during the week of of the grades received by MAG members. Proposals will be rank ordered and accepted according to available space. finalization. an overall balance of the themes/topics. It is possible that for certain proposals, which scored just below the threshold of space and availability, the MAG will discuss whether to ask the proposers to make improvements to overcome deficiencies. Proposers will then be contacted and asked to submit a revised proposal. same issues, topics and format. Due to constraints in space, these similar workshops will be invited to collaborate and “merge” together. Secretariat. In the event that the proposers decline to collaborate the workshop slot can be lost. programme will then be finalized. topics that are addressed in the Main Sessions will not be scheduled at the same time. Break-out Group Discussions, Debates, BoFs, Flash Session and Other (new and innovative) formats will be preferred over Panel formats. resource persons list on the IGF website. participants. (XGA/SVGA Data), will be available free of charge. Details related to the logistics will be made available in due course. language, is only provided free of charge for the Main Sessions. If workshop session organizers would like to have interpretation for their Session, they would need to bear the cost. To have more information about arranging interpretation for your session, please contact the Secretariat at igf[at]unog.ch inclusive, practical, and efficient. report to the IGF Secretariat within two weeks of the IGF meeting. As indicated in Stage 1, above, workshop organizers failing to meet this deadline will not be allowed to hold an event at the following IGF meeting. _______________________________________________ DC3 mailing list DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3