Although I'd like us to have a roundtable moment
and be all nice and
relaxed, wasn't Vint Cerf coming to open our gathering on the fifth? Surely
the biggest advantage of that was to attract attention to our project? On
the tenth, on the other hand, we'd like to get as many people as possible
to join our group, so that won't really work either. I suggest we'd take an
hour during the IGF and book a spare meeting room or some other space OR
have an hour or two before Vint turns up.
We do need a database for the community networks and we'd also need to
start drawing conclusions from it, i.e. what is the best solution of
software and hardware to build a community network. I will be in
Guadalajara from 1.12.-11.12. so basically open to suggestions on meeting
about DC3 over a pint or in a more official manner. :)
-Raoul
On 17 November 2016 at 08:06, Nicolás Echániz <nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net>
wrote:
I've checked some dates now that the
schedule is online:
https://igf2016.sched.org/
So, these are the DC3-related activities during IGF 2016 in Guadalajara,
Mexico
1) An IGF pre-event on the afternoon of 5 December (IGF Day 0)
2) Disco-Tech, on the evening of 5 December (last years’ programme
https://www.apc.org/en/node/21284 )
3) DC on Community Connectivity, December 7, 12:00 - 13:30
featuring the authors of the papers included in the DC3 Report
https://igf2016.sched.org/event/8htn/dc-on-community-connectivity
4) WS238: Community Connectivity: empowering the unconnected. December
7, 15:00 - 16:30
https://igf2016.sched.org/event/8htE/ws238-community-connec
tivity-empowering-the-unconnected
https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf2016/index.php/proposal/
view_public/238
5) Post-IGF event on community networking, on 10 December, 10:00 - 17:00.
University of Guadalajara. Open to interested people.
I'd like us to plan a bit so we can make the most of all these sessions.
Activities 3 and 4 don't seem to need any further planning. Do they?
Disco-Tech needs to be coordinated among APC, DC3 and other interested
parties. I'm not aware of any planification about this so far.
Regarding the pre and post evente, I believe we should have some time for
a DC3 "internal meeting" that's not open to the general public but rather
more of a round table like the one we had in Bogotá. Jane has told me the
idea during the post-event is to make it open, so that would leave the
pre-event for a more inner DC3 meeting. Or maybe we could plan to make part
of the post-event dedicated to inner planning and discussion and another
part open to the public?
The purpose of such inner meeting for me is to come together, have
everyone update the group on what are the news, the ongoing activities and
plans ahead.
For example, we have discussed previously about the importance of having
a presence and some clear objectives for the 2017 World Telecommunication
Development Conference (
http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/C
onferences/WTDC/Pages/default.aspx) but so far we haven't discussed
about this on the DC3 list. This to me is an important topic to discuss in
person so we can maximize results.
This was proposed by Rhizomatica and most of us (present in Bogotá)
agreed that it's important to push the Community Connectivity perspective
there, considering results from that conference can have more binding
outcomes than other events.
We have also talked about working on creating a global Community Networks
database that we can keep updated over time. This was discussed a bit on
the "Network Communities data" thread[1]. It was also brought up again by
Conraad lately in the "Rural access success stories" thread[2]; with a
different perspective.
My approach to this is to frame it in the lines of what PCC.I/RES.268
from CITEL's 2016 meeting in El Salvador[3] says:
"""
a) Documentation, systematization, sharing, and dissemination of results
and experiences of national initiatives related to the implementation
of Recommendation ITU-D 19 [4] as it pertains to the development
of small nonprofit community operators that serve the
communications needs of these (rural and remote) areas.
"""
I believe this would put the DC3 in a position of visibility in the
American continent (CITEL) but also elsewhere, as a point of reference
regarding the issues we address.
I guess we have many other important matters to discuss. I'd very much
like the DC3 to be a proactive collective and not just a "community
connectivity think tank"... YMMV :)
Sorry for the long e-mail... I've been wanting to propose this for quite
some time but had no opportunity to write before.
Cheers,
Nico
[1]
http://listas.altermundi.net/pipermail/dc3/2016-June/000208.html
[2]
http://listas.altermundi.net/pipermail/dc3/2016-November/000370.html
[3]
https://www.citel.oas.org/en/SiteAssets/PCCI/Final-Reports/C
CPI-2016-28-4000_i.pdf
[3] (spanish)
https://www.citel.oas.org/en/S
iteAssets/PCCI/Final-Reports/CCPI-2016-28-4000_e.pdf
[4]
http://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-d/rec/d/D-REC-D.19-201003-
I!!PDF-E.pdf
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net