Hi SIva
You mentioned to be free from Telcom authority. I recall that ARIN (
RIR for North America) had policy changes on Community Networking and
perhaps we should assess their rules and other RIR's on this issue
Chief Information Officer
*YOUR SOURCE FOR INTERNET GOVERNANCE EDUCATION *
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 9:03 AM sivasubramanian muthusamy <
6.internet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In providing inputs with success stories, the DC
could also emphasize
that the CNs would thrive far better in their non-traditional model, free
of the patterns of the telecom regulatory model.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:23 PM Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br> wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Thanks for sharing this!
>
> Indeed I uploaded the contributions more than one month ago but it
> really took weeks to have them displayed on the contributions page you
> shared!! I received a confirmation email but I checked several times the
> ITU website and it is the first time I am seing them displayed!!
> Great mystery...
>
> I think another easy way to contribute would be for ISOC regional
> bueraus to use the regional CN reports we drafted as contributions. @Jane
> Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org> do you think you colleagues can submit the
> LatAm and Africa reports as contributions? The LatAm is below. Cannot find
> the African report Carlos drafted. Are there other reports?
>
>
>
https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2018/community-networks-in-la…
>
>
>
<https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2018/community-networks-in-latin-america/>
> Community Networks in Latin America | Internet Society
>
<https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2018/community-networks-in-latin-america/>
> 2019 Impact Report: Community Networks. Community networks — networks
> built, managed, and used by local communities — are cornerstones of the
> Internet Society’s work.
>
www.internetsociety.org
>
> Best
> Luca
>
>
>
> [image:
>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg]
>
>
> *Luca Belli, PhD*
>
> *Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation*
>
> [image:
>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55
> 21 3799 *5763* *t*@1lucabelli <https://twitter.com/1lucabelli>
>
> [image:
>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.j…
> de Botafogo, 190 13º andar
>
> Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900
>
> [image:
>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg]
> luca.belli(a)fgv.br
>
> [image:
>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]*www.…
> <http://www.cyberbrics.info/> |
www.CPDP.lat <http://www.CPDP.lat>*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *De:* dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net <
> dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> em nome de Carlos Rey-Moreno <
> carlos.reymoreno(a)gmail.com>
> *Enviado:* sexta-feira, 27 de novembro de 2020 07:01
> *Para:* Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <
> dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> *Assunto:* Re: [DC3] ITU Council seeking input on how Community
> Networks increase Internet connectivity
>
> Hi everyone, great to see the contribution from DC3 already listed in
> the submissions made to this process!
>
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-sep2020.aspx
>
> Also some other colleagues have contributed too! Thanks all! I would
> encourage anyone from the list to make a submission as well, so the voices
> from the CN movement are heard by the ITU and balance the voices of those
> that do not want CNs to thrill. Just by reviewing the submission from GSMA
>
https://www.itu.int/en/Lists/consultationSep2020/Attachments/9//GSMA%20Cont…
> , one can read:
>
> "Community Networks are a specific solution to often unique
> geographical, commercial, and/or logistical challenges in delivering
> connectivity, strongly depending on engaged individuals. These unique
> characteristics are limiting their scalability and applicability as a
> general policy mechanism to expand internet access to over 600
> million people. Regulations and supporting policies should equally
> empower community networks and operators in ways that do not
> impair connectivity expansion initiatives through large-scale commercial
> networks, for example, by carefully assessing the risk of underusing scarce
> spectrum resources set aside for community networks."
>
> Deadline is 15th December.
>
> best,
>
> carlos
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 09:56, Carlos <carlos(a)apc.org> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> After all the noise some of us have made at national, regional and
> international Internet Governance spaces, it looks like the ITU Council
> wants to hear directly “How can small/community/non-profit operators
> help in promoting the increase of Internet connectivity?”
>
> This poses an unique opportunity to showcase directly to the ITU
> Council
> all the amazing work that most of you are doing, specially at times
> where CNs are gaining more and more visibility to curve the digital
> divide and rural marginalization that is now more and more apparent due
> to the pandemic. And I say directly because this request is made
> through
> one of the very few consultations the ITU open to all stakeholders: the
> Open Public Consultation of the Council Working Group on International
> Internet-related Public Policy Issues (CWG-Internet). I provide a bit
> of
> background about it below for those who are interested.
>
> The consultation is structured as a set of questions, one of them the
> one included above, available in the following link:
>
>
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-sep2020.aspx
> where you can also find important information and instructions on the
> submission process.
>
> I think it is strategically important that the ITU receives as many
> contributions from each of us as possible highlighting the many
> different ways community operators help in promoting the increase of
> Internet connectivity. This will surely contribute in creating a more
> policy and regulatory environment for community networks in each of
> your
> countries.
>
> I’ve copied some of the basic instructions to participate below.
> Participating can be as easy as forwarding existing text you may have
> written (the GISWatch country report for those of you who wrote it:
>
https://www.giswatch.org/community-networks) to the email address
> below.
>
> Note that your online submission can be drafted in a UN language other
> than English (these are Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish),
> but you are encouraged (not obliged) to provide a translation in
> English
> for the benefit of all readers.
>
> At APC we are available to provide support to any of you wanting to
> make
> a submission but struggling with the process. Please do not hesitate to
> reach out to me directly.
>
> Best,
>
> carlos
>
> == Basic instructions ==
>
> You can include your responses to the questions into the online form in
> the following link :
>
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/form-oct2019.aspx OR
> send it to InternetPublicViews(a)itu.int including your Full Name,
> Title,
> Country and Organization you are representing.
>
> Your response will then be published on the ITU Website:
>
>
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-sep2020.aspx
>
> Please include each submission also includes a short summary/abstract
> (1-3 paragraphs). This will form part of the final summary document to
> be published after the end of the physical open consultation meeting.
>
> == Background ==
>
> ITU Council Working Groups
>
> There are different Working Groups set up to provide input to the ITU
> Council in different matters. In the last last Council Group (February,
> 2020) meeting four appeared to be active [1]:
>
> - Council Working Group on International Internet-related Public Policy
> Issues (CWG-Internet)
>
> - Council working group on Child Online Protection (WG-CP)
>
> - Council Working Group on WSIS (WG-WSIS)
>
> - Council Working Group on Financial and Human Resources (CWG-FHR)
>
> The participation in those working groups varies and some are for
> Members States (MS) only, others allow for the participation of Sector
> Members (too).
>
> CWG-Internet is limited to Member States, but they hold an open
> consultation to all stakeholders. This poses one of the few
> opportunities for Civil Society Organizations that are not Sector
> Members of the ITU to present their views to the ITU Council. In most
> other ITU’s consultations, organizations such as the Association for
> Progressive Communications and the Internet Society, both with Sector
> Member status do their best to bring the voice of the Civil Society in
> general, and of community networks in particular to these spaces.
>
> In particular, CWG-Internet is tasked to identify, study and develop
> matters related to international Internet-related public policy issues
> and to disseminate its outputs throughout ITU's membership, as well as
> to report annually to the Council on activities undertaken on these
> subjects [2] [3].
>
> The 13th Session of the ITU Council Working Group on International
> Internet-related Public Policy Issues (CWG-Internet) decided on 20
> September 2019 to hold an open consultation (online and physical) on
> “International internet-related public policy issues on harnessing new
> and emerging telecommunications/ICTs for sustainable development” where
> some of our contributions provided already content in relation to
> community connectivity [4].
>
> In the 13th Session it was also decided that the next round of Open
> Consultations (February 2020 – August 2020), on the topic of “Expanding
> Internet Connectivity” with the questions below: [5]
>
> Expanding Internet Connectivity
>
> - What are the challenges and opportunities for expanding Internet
> connectivity, particularly to remote and under-served areas? What are
> the roles of governments and non-government actors in overcoming these
> challenges?
>
> - Are there particular challenges facing land-locked countries in
> securing affordable Internet access? What can be done to overcome these
> challenges?
>
> - How can small/community/non-profit operators help in promoting the
> increase of Internet connectivity?
>
> [1]
https://www.itu.int/en/council/Pages/groups.aspx
>
> [2]
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/default.aspx
>
> [3]
https://www.itu.int/md/S19-CL-C-0136/en
>
> [4]
>
>
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-oct2019.aspx
>
> [5]
>
>
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/19/rclintpol13/c/S19-RCLINTPOL13-C-001…
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
> Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
> Association for Progressive Communications
>
>
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-…
> Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
> Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DC3 mailing list
> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
> "Community and Local Access Networks" Project Coordinator
> Association for Progressive Communications
>
>
https://www.apc.org/en/project/local-access-networks-can-unconnected-connec…
> Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
> Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
> _______________________________________________
> DC3 mailing list
> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3