Yes, analogies depend on its prescribed use, like medicines, in a
limited context. The analogy works well to me with sound, voice, music.
I agree that moving to the upper layers gets tricky, we get to speech,
we can play with the idea of freedom, communication in a linguistic
sense, meaning ... too complex and far from our internet infrastructure,
connectivity, etc. Thanks a lot for your clarification, I'll ready
carefully your article. Best regards, Leandro.
On 20/2/17 22:56, Bob Frankston wrote:
We need to be careful about taking analogies speech and relaying
speech when we talk about connectivity. We’re not relaying speech,
we’re relaying meaningless generic packets. This makes all the
difference in the world.
To the extent to which we are in the legacy telecom framing we do
having speech being controlled by providers so understand the need to
deal with it on those terms.
But fungible connectivity using generic packets doesn’t have the same
ability to exclude so we can work on connectivity separate from
particular social policies. We still need to deal with the social
issues but on their own terms.
http://rmf.vc/PurposeVsDiscovery might
help with understanding this. Once we outside of telecom we still need
to deal with the social issues on their own terms apart from the
technology. As well as other consequences.
As an aside it’s interesting that JCR Licklider and Bob Taylor who
played key roles in giving us the Internet were both acoustic
psychologists. They studied how the brain interprets noises as speech.
One of the things at MIT when I was there were the “language wars”
with Chomsky on the formalist side. I sided with the AI and
psycholinguists (like Lick but he had moved on to computers by then).
Lakoff and Papert were also on the AI / Psycholinguistics side. I
mention this because it’s part of understanding the difference between
communications and speech in the cognitive sense of meaning vs.
“communications” in the technology sense which is (now) very different.
*From:*dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] *On Behalf Of *Leandro Navarro
*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 13:14
*To:* dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
*Subject:* Re: [DC3] IEEE/World Bank event
Hi, I find the analogy of the acoustic space and audio tech useful
with CN (as it breaks with the idea of pipes and focuses more on
social interaction, human rights).
We have the acoustic space where we everyone agrees on rights and
freedoms of speech, access and communication: a natural space for
comm/interaction that just works if we are close enough to each other.
As scale grows we need technology aids to amplify the sound and cover
a large area and that may create exclusion and other issues: those
with the microphone, places equipped with infrastructure, money
required, business models about that tech and its services...
For (interaction in) the digital space we always need technology aids,
tech infrastructure, as this is an artificial space (human made). Tech
enables this digital space not only in the local scope (homes,
schools, communities), and when inter-networking, it also works at the
global scope (Internet).
Similar to audio tech, choices and models around the infrastructure
and services in the digital space make a big difference in universal
participation in the digital space, critical for full participation in
society.
Leandro.
On 20/2/17 16:24, Bob Frankston wrote:
Thanks. It is a challenge to get people to think outside the idea
of the Internet as something that flows through pipes. I
appreciate any suggestions into how to better explain the
concepts. I’m working on any essay now that positions the Internet
as byproduct of a fundamental conceptual shift (or, if you wish,
paradigm)
*From:*dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] *On Behalf Of *Michael
Oghia
*Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 10:02
*To:* Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net> <mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>
*Subject:* Re: [DC3] IEEE/World Bank event
I really liked your post, Bob, specifically this line:
"We’re accustomed to thinking of networking as a service and
networks as physical things like railroads with well-defined
tracks. The Internet is more like the road system that emerges
from the way we use any path available. We aren’t even confined to
roads thanks to our ability to buy our own off-road vehicles.
There is no physical network as such but rather disparate
transports for raw packets which make no promises other than a
best effort to transport packets."
Thanks for sharing!
Best,
-Michael
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Bob Frankston
<Bob19-0501(a)bobf.frankston.com
<mailto:Bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com>> wrote:
I’m active with the IEEE (board of governors of the consumer
electronics society) but the organization is struggling to get
past it’s hardware orientation. It is very difficult to get
the traditional players to think of the Internet as anything
but another telecommunications service. I failed with this
IEEE initiative. You can get a sense of this in the enthusiasm
for 5G
(
http://spectrum.ieee.org/video/telecom/wireless/everything-you-need-to-know…)
vs what I wrote after CES (
http://rmf.vc/5GATSC).
The Internet as a byproduct of software and as infrastructure
is a very different framing. It would be good if the IMF could
understand that and if you have suggestions for how to be
heard I’m open to suggestions.
*From:*dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>] *On Behalf Of
*Judith Hellerstein
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 09:42
*To:* dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>
*Subject:* Re: [DC3] IEEE/World Bank event
HI Bob,
Historically the IEEE event is held one day before the
Fall/spring World Bank/IMF meetings since the meetings are
April 21-23 that leads me to think the IEEE meeting is on
April 20, but best is to ask the IEEE.
It is also likely that the Fall meeting will be on October 12
since the Fall meetings are on October 13-15 2017
Best,
Judith
_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
E-mail: Judith(a)jhellerstein.com <mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com> Website:
www.jhellerstein.com <http://www.jhellerstein.com>
Linked In:
www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/>
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
On 2/17/2017 9:31 AM, dc3(a)bob.ma <mailto:dc3@bob.ma> wrote:
April 20? I need to learn more ASAP because I was about to
sign up for an event in California April 19-21^st that has
a deadline of today. But from my experience these events
are set pieces rather than places to effect real change.
And given the current policy climate …
I see some of the usual suspects on the list from last
year – is it a good opportunity for effective hall
conversations? It's really about the networking and
conversations rather than the presentations. That's what
made IGF so valuable – meeting the others on this list.
I have toyed with working with ISOC on organizing a
workshop on connectivity as infrastructure but not sure if
I can do any better. Having real deployments speaks a lot
louder.
*From:*dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net>[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net]
*On Behalf Of *Judith Hellerstein
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 07:48
*To:* Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net> <mailto:dc3@listas.altermundi.net>
*Subject:* Re: [DC3] IEEE/World Bank event
Hi Michael,
This email was for last years event. The IEEE and the
world bank hold this event twice a year timed with the
fall and spring world bank/imf meetings. This year the
meetings are April 20. I do not think the announcement is
out yet about the April meeting. I will be attending. I
have attended the two previous events
Best,
Judith
Sent from my iPad
Judith(a)jhellerstein.com <mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com>
Skype ID: judithhellerstein
On Feb 17, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Michael Oghia
<mike.oghia(a)gmail.com <mailto:mike.oghia@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is anyone planning on attending this (including you
Bob)? It might be a good networking/outreach activity:
IEEE, in conjunction with the World Bank, will be
holding the Global Connect Stakeholders: Advancing
Solutions event in Washington, DC, on 13-14 April
http://internetinitiative.ieee.org/events/conferences/global-connect-stakeh…
Best,
-Michael
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3