Dear Jane
I landed on Qualcomm 5G starting from Village Telco's mesh potato shop
which listed Access Points built around a 802.11n standard System on Chip,
quickly understood 802.11ac to be superior, tried to find other SOCs and
somehow reached a Qualcomm 5G use case presentation, read about the New
Radio, about its better use of spectrum, and its capacity for data being
100x that of 4G. Though the use cases do not specifically present
scenarios in rural setting, rural (remote) healthcare and precision
agriculture are some of the phrases I have come across.
In two or three years, the equipment cost differences would become
insignificant. Judging by its benefits such as its ability to use sub 1GH
- 6GH and MM wave bands, and by its capacity to bring down data 'costs',
the cost per rural user connected by 5G would actually be lower compared to
present technologies.
Also, should Community Networks only be rural Community Networks? Why not
also develop Urban Community Networks following the NYC example, and
percolate the progress down to rural networks?
It is difficult to support this, but 5G technologies may also pave way for
related advances such as improved range of Point to Point backhaul
equipment that would make it easier to beam signals over great distances to
reach rural communities far more easily.
While writing this, I see two new messages, one talks about "frugal 5G
Research" at IIT Bombay, various initiatives such as this might lead to
some solutions. Another message says that some features of the 5G
technology works against locally owned connectivity. (Bob could explain
this better)
5G is said to be led by 3GPP, some of these partners would be able to tell
us if 5G could be cost-effectively deployed to create independent Community
Networks:
. If 5G development also
needs to be driven to further the emerging Community Network eco-system by
participation, just to ensure that the equipment, standards and
architecture are not entirely driven by telecom business models.
5G equipment is likely to be initially expensive, but I think it would be
easier for Community Networks to leap to 5G just as India did from analog
phones straight to 3G, just as India leaped from its 1956 Morris Oxford to
the 1984 Suzuki in 1984, skipping years of intermediary evolution.
The Community Network initiative would progress on a far grander scale if
you and a few other CN leaders pay attention to developments (especially by
attending conferences and being part of the Communities) of submarine
networks, communication satellites, and such standards as 5G.
Sivasubramanian M
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:54 AM Jane Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org> wrote:
Hi Siva –
Thank you for this.
From what I have seen – 5G seems to be an urban solution with some heavy
equipment costs (still in projection phase).
Have you seen any presentations on 5G and rural solutions?
Best,
Jane
Internet Society |
www.internetsociety.org
Skype: janercoffin
Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
*From: *<dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Sivasubramanian
M <6.Internet(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
*Date: *Monday, August 27, 2018 at 6:17 PM
*To: *"steve(a)villagetelco.org" <steve(a)villagetelco.org>rg>, Dynamic
Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
*Subject: *Re: [DC3] A Community-Run ISP Is the Highest Rated Broadband
Company in America
I am not sure if the attached Qualcomm presentation by Yongbin Wei has
already been shared by any one in this mailing list. Found this,
interesting because it talks about horizontal and vertical spectrum
sharing, says MM bands are naturally more suitable for sharing, talks about
Spatial Division Multiplexing, others on this list might understand all
this better...
Aspire and take CNs to 5G ????
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:57 PM Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Steve,
Thank you for your kind words.
I took time to respond to your message as I was spending time on
http://villagetelco.org . Watched the video on the front page, and it
was fascinating to learn that mesh potato also doubles as some form of a
local telecom intranet.
Long before messenger, skype and whatsapp, sometime during 2000, a friend
from Montreal told me that his telecom provider bundled wireless in his
cellular telephone, and provided the ability for the subscribers to use the
phone as a phone, and also as a wireless handset, with options (don't
recollect if it was for the extended cellular range or for the limited
wireless range, and not sure if the wireless range was different from the
cellular range) for each subscriber to choose five other subscribers as an
inner network, flip a button and talk to any of them, and the four others
in turn had the ability to choose their own circle of five friends.
Mesh potato enhances the value of the Community Networks by enabling local
communications. When the Internet of Community Networks is bundled with LAN
features, and even more, with close circle network features, the value of
the Community Network surpasses that of commercial networks. Just a
thought. ( I am also reading your hardware specifications with interest.)
Sivasubramanian M
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:50 PM Steve Song <steve(a)villagetelco.org>
wrote:
Dear Siva,
Thank you for taking the time to review and make such thoughtful
commentary on the draft paper. We will certainly take your feedback into
consideration in producing the final version.
Regards... Steve (and Carlos)
P.S. Love the parking lot analogy!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 12:34, Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Jane,
Please receive the attached comments on the ISOC Spectrum Paper together
with some unverified thoughts.
Sivasubramanian M
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 2:13 AM Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 7:11 AM Jane Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org> wrote:
Hi Siva –
Brian Hall from NYC Mesh is included in this thread. He can help explain
NYCMesh.
I fully agree that different connectivity models need to be considered and
would add that different policy/regulatory models also need to be
considered. It is something we are keenly in favor of 😉
Links to some recent papers on Community Networks also are below and
attached is a Spectrum Paper we are looking for feed-back on by 24 August.
midnight DC time?
Thanks.
Steve Song, Carlos Rey-Moreno, Mike Jensen are the primary authors with
direction/collaboration with our team at the Internet Society. Please send
me an email if you do have comments for us to consider.
Other Resources:
Case Study/Article re CN in Georgia:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/05/technology/caucuses-mountain…
African CN Paper – Partnership with Carlos Rey-Moreno:
https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CommunityNetwork…
India – CN Paper – Partnership with DEF:
https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/W4C-Policy-Paper…
Licensing Brief:
https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Unleashing-Commu…
Spectrum Approaches for CNs:
https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Spectrum-Approac…
The inputs to the IGF from this Coalition are really great and Luca has
the links.
Best,
Jane
Internet Society |
www.internetsociety.org
Skype: janercoffin
Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
*From: *<dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Sivasubramanian
M <6.Internet(a)gmail.com>
*Reply-To: *Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
*Date: *Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 1:47 PM
*To: *Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>gt;, osama manzar <osamam(a)gmail.com>
*Subject: *Re: [DC3] A Community-Run ISP Is the Highest Rated Broadband
Company in America
Dear Jane,
Thank you for the informative messages and links. DEF has done
considerable work in the area of Community Networks, and several networks
such as the one that Sarbani has written about exist in India. However
there are issues related to the scale and scope of operation, which revolve
around the regulatory policies that make it a little difficult to create
and operate networks.
If I understood well, the NY Mesh network has a supernode from the IXP and
its bandwidth comes from the IXP. I am copying this thread to Osama
Manzar of DEF to ask if there are examples of Community Networks in India
that do not depend on agreements with Telecom Operators / telecom related
ISPs, which may not wholeheartedly support Community Networks beyond the
notion of small rural networks.
There are a few problems that need to be addressed, and a different
connectivity model may be required together with ample support from the
Telecom ministry for the spread of community networks in India.
Thank you.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:01 PM Jane Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org> wrote:
Apologies - I hit send before adding the links:
DEF:
http://defindia.org/
Video on The Land of Zero Connect:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq27X8CJLTM
Link to APC's Community Network Newsletter:
https://www.apc.org/en/project/local-access-networks-can-unconnected-connec…
ISOC's Community Network site:
https://www.internetsociety.org/issues/community-networks/
Internet Society |
www.internetsociety.org
Skype: janercoffin
Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
On 8/16/18, 11:52 AM, "dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf of
Jane Coffin" <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf of
coffin(a)isoc.org> wrote:
To add - you will find a lot of interesting information here at the
DEF site:
See also this video about a remote area of India and lack of
connectivity and Community Networks coming in to help:
We often hear these arguments about "coverage". The issue is not just
the mobile network footprint (coverage area), but whether the services are
affordable, and if end-users have a choice. Community Networks are a
viable option in
Internet Society |
www.internetsociety.org
Skype: janercoffin
Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
On 8/16/18, 11:27 AM, "dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf of
Sarbani Banerjee Belur" <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf of
sarbanibelur(a)iitb.ac.in> wrote:
Hi Sivasubramanian,
Community networks does exist in India and it is a sustainable
initiative.
Gram Marg at IIT Bombay has set up one spanning 10 villages in
Palghar,
Maharashtra, Digital Empowerment Foundation has set up some as
well. There
are more going to be set up in this year and the next. These CNs
are set
up in locations that have no mobile connectivity and are usually in
remote, rural villages of India.
Local ISPs have come to the rescue and provide bandwidth in such
locations.
With regards,
Sarbani
In Chennai, India, I spoke to someone in an
educational
institution about
starting a Community Network. He argued that
access is no longer
a problem
as Telecom companies offer 3G and 4G services
everywhere. He
wouldn't
listen to arguments concerning the cost and
clever pricing
models of
access
that indiscernably amass huge sums by microscopic extraction,
wouldn't
listen to arguments about nominal and actual
bandwidth. He and
some
others
take the position that a case does not exist for Community
Networks here.
Happens to be an iconic opinion. It is a challenge to present
arguments,
articles such as this are of ample help.
Sivasubramanian M
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 5:20 PM Marco Zennaro <mzennaro(a)ictp.it>
wrote:
> Interesting news:
>
>
>
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ne5k5m/consumer-reports-broadban…
Cheers,
Marco
Marco Zennaro, PhD // Research Officer // T/ICT4D Lab // ICTP //
wireless.ictp.it
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Dr. Sarbani Banerjee Belur
Senior Project Research Scientist
Program Manager
Gram Marg: Rural Broadband Project
Department of Electrical Engineering
IIT Bombay
Powai
Mumbai 400076
Mob: +91 9867282979
+91 7045620077
Website:
www.grammarg.in
Homepage:
http://homepages.iitb.ac.in/~sarbanibelur/
Blog:
sarbanibelur.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Sivasubramanian M
Please send all replies to 6.Internet(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Sivasubramanian M
Please send all replies to 6.Internet(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Steve Song
+1 902 529 0046
http://villagetelco.org
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Sivasubramanian M
Please send all replies to 6.Internet(a)gmail.com
--
Sivasubramanian M
Please send all replies to 6.Internet(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Sivasubramanian M
Please send all replies to 6.Internet(a)gmail.com