Luca – Really good. I have made some small tweaks. Best, Jane Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org Skype: janercoffin Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429 From: &lt;dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; on behalf of Luca Belli &lt;luca.belli(a)fgv.br&gt; Reply-To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity &lt;dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity &lt;dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; Subject: [DC3] Paragraphs for the IGF Connecting & Enabling the Next Billion(s) Report Hi all, The IGF Secretariat asked whether the DC3 is interested in submitting two paragraphs to be included in the IGF Report on Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion(s), in order to explain how community networks can support the UN Sustainable Development Goals in connecting and enabling more users. Info on the IGF Connecting & Enabling the Next Billion(s) can be found here http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/policy-options-for-connection-the-next-billi… I think this could be a good opportunity. I prepared the paras below that you can modify (by 26 October) using this pad https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Paragraphs_for_Connecting_the_Nex_Bil… Community networks (CN) are a subset of crowdsourced networks, structured to be open, free, and neutral. Such networks rely on the active participation of local communities in the deployment and management of the shared infrastructure as a common resource, owned by the community and operated in a democratic fashion. CNs can be operationalised, wholly or partly, through local private sector entities or public administrations and are characterised by collective ownership; social management; open design and open participation; freedom of peering free transit as well as the utilisation of open source software and technologies. Over the past decade, a variety of successful examples of CNs have emerged in all continents, exploiting many technical and governance configurations, as documented by the Report of the Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity.* Such examples have demonstrated that CNs may be a viable option to connect the unconnected while truly empowering local communities. Notably, the establishment of CNs has proven that local stakeholders, including public administrations, entrepreneurs and NGOs, may become protagonists of the development of Internet connectivity, build infrastructure form the first square mile. Furthermore, CNs have fostered the development of new services, applications and local content as well as the creation of occupations, reaching several dozen jobs, as in the Guifi.net case. Therefore, CNs should be considered as a credible option for connecting the unconnected, while public policies should be crafted in order to facilitate rather than hinder the establishment of CN, as suggested by the Declaration on Community Connectivity.** *reference to the URL of the DC3 Report **reference to the Guadalajara Declaration Best Luca [GV Direito Rio] Luca Belli, PhD Senior Researcher Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/> luca.belli(a)fgv.br +55 21 3799 5763 [ttp://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]

Hi All – See this from Arjuna re a January workshop he is hosting: All - Please find the page for the GAIA workshop here: http://dsg.ac.upc.edu/gaia-cn-ws If you are interested in attending/giving a talk, please fill in the doodle: http://doodle.com/poll/sd3tzkgxqmzfvb2d Please register before 31, October 2016. Regards Arjuna Jane… Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org Skype: janercoffin Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429 From: &lt;dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; on behalf of Luca Belli &lt;luca.belli(a)fgv.br&gt; Reply-To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity &lt;dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity &lt;dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net&gt; Subject: [DC3] Paragraphs for the IGF Connecting & Enabling the Next Billion(s) Report Hi all, The IGF Secretariat asked whether the DC3 is interested in submitting two paragraphs to be included in the IGF Report on Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion(s), in order to explain how community networks can support the UN Sustainable Development Goals in connecting and enabling more users. Info on the IGF Connecting & Enabling the Next Billion(s) can be found here http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/policy-options-for-connection-the-next-billi… I think this could be a good opportunity. I prepared the paras below that you can modify (by 26 October) using this pad https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Paragraphs_for_Connecting_the_Nex_Bil… Community networks (CN) are a subset of crowdsourced networks, structured to be open, free, and neutral. Such networks rely on the active participation of local communities in the deployment and management of the shared infrastructure as a common resource, owned by the community and operated in a democratic fashion. CNs can be operationalised, wholly or partly, through local private sector entities or public administrations and are characterised by collective ownership; social management; open design and open participation; freedom of peering free transit as well as the utilisation of open source software and technologies. Over the past decade, a variety of successful examples of CNs have emerged in all continents, exploiting many technical and governance configurations, as documented by the Report of the Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity.* Such examples have demonstrated that CNs may be a viable option to connect the unconnected while truly empowering local communities. Notably, the establishment of CNs has proven that local stakeholders, including public administrations, entrepreneurs and NGOs, may become protagonists of the development of Internet connectivity, build infrastructure form the first square mile. Furthermore, CNs have fostered the development of new services, applications and local content as well as the creation of occupations, reaching several dozen jobs, as in the Guifi.net case. Therefore, CNs should be considered as a credible option for connecting the unconnected, while public policies should be crafted in order to facilitate rather than hinder the establishment of CN, as suggested by the Declaration on Community Connectivity.** *reference to the URL of the DC3 Report **reference to the Guadalajara Declaration Best Luca [GV Direito Rio] Luca Belli, PhD Senior Researcher Head of Internet Governance @ FGV<http://internet-governance.fgv.br/> luca.belli(a)fgv.br +55 21 3799 5763 [ttp://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]