This is an amazing point of view Bob, you are absolutely right, as a matter
of fact the connectivity should solve a least a few of the problems of the
community, even with a low bandwidth service like mine 0.5Mbps you can use
youtube without expensive fees.
Thanks for the comment, warm regards.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2016-04-06 18:23 GMT-04:30 <dc3(a)bob.ma>ma>:
We have to be very careful about what problem we are
solving. I’m very
familiar with these broadband efforts and the people involved. These are
old school models of broadband as a high speed connection to the web and
generally are associated with business models that are require putting a
paywall around the high cost infrastructure. In fact the very term
“broadband” has become associated, as I explained in my talk at RightsCon,
with a provider owning the facilities to sell their own services. All the
terminology in these reports – last mile, back haul is traditional
telecommunications service provider with the community as consumers not
peers.
As I see it community-owned is a very different dynamic starting with
local ownership that takes advantage of local opportunities including
making use of existing facilities (copper, radios, trucks or whatever) and
enabling people to work together locally and then at a larger scale. It
starts at a very low cost and then builds as people appreciate the value in
connectivity.
We need to be careful. WiFi and fiber are just technologies and not
special. And the Internet is about more than the web. Vital services such
as connected healthcare, environmental management and much more need
free-to-use connectivity and do not require high speed. Is our goal more
YouTube or more empowerment? We will get YouTube but there is no need to
pay for premium for it before we get immediate benefit from simple
free-to-use connectivity.
*From:* dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net [mailto:
dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net] *On Behalf Of *Luca Belli
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 5, 2016 17:33
*To:* Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
*Subject:* [DC3] Reports on Municipal Fiber Networks and Broadband
Public-Private Partnerships
Hi all,
Some food for thoughts below.
A very interesting report on the financial costs and benefits of municipal
fiber network
http://www.sfbos.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=55324
and one on Broadband Public–Private Partnerships
https://www.benton.org/sites/default/files/partnerships.pdf
Best
Luca
[image: FGV Direito Rio]
*Luca Belli, PhD*
*Pesquisador | Researcher*
*Lead of **Internet Governance @ FGV* <http://internet-governance.fgv.br/>
luca.belli(a)fgv.br
+55 21 3799 *5763*
[image:
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png]
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Maureen Patricia Hernández González
Tesista Universidad de Los Andes - Venezuela
<https://ve.linkedin.com/in/maureenhernandez>
<https://twitter.com/maureenhg> <https://www.facebook.com/maureen.hg>