Hi Leandro and all
Thank you very much for sharing the IETF presentation. Very interesting.
I share your view but not completely (if I understand it correctly J).
I agree that it would be the socially just to combine different uses
in shared fibre cables (what you call self-service for the city
council [or may be other administration]; private use; common use),
however I think it might be more successful if the proportion is not
exactly the same.
Thanks a lot for your comments!
The main point ("universal" usage) is enabling and supporting the three
types of uses at once when a private is willing to deploy and occupy
non-private areas of land/water.
Like income or VAT taxes, the proportion of return to achieve
"universality" might need to be adjusted. The "universality" (for
everyone, for the three types of uses) requires a return in terms of min
cost communication paths as an "added-value" opportunity for
communication in each usage groups, and these paths can be in terms of
structural units (e.g. wavelengths in a fibre, or fibre in a tube). The
specific proportions mentioned developed in a very different scenario
(municipal ordinance for the regulation and promotion of private fibre
deployments in public land) and I agree 66% of "fibre tax" might not
translate right in this scenario, and may not be need either.
The principle is more clear by opposition, a purely private deployment
and use of a submarine cable, that does not enable the added-value of
"universal" connectivity, does not sound right (even with a cash-based
tax payment to a few governments only).
Once a path is there, the capacity of a fibre for each usage type can
grow virtually unlimited by switching the endpoints (governance,
cooperative commons, is needed in each usage type). Therefore both
public use (research, gov) and shared/commons (for instance IX
interconnection, carriers? ...) can benefit from that too.
Best, Leandro.
Considering that nowadays new submarine cables are
increasingly
developed by private actors for private use only (with increasing role
played by Facebook and Google as cable shareholders) I think it would
be overoptimistic to think such players would keep on invest the same
amount of money if they can use on 1 third of the total capacity
(assuming that this is what you were arguing in the presentation).
It is possible and I think it would be more successful to argue that
part of the total capacity or even half must dedicated to
common/public use but I think that more than this may discourage
investments (which are quite important as regards the construction of
submarine cables).
Actually, I am arguing that the example above is feasible because it
is precisely what is happening with the Ellalink cable, connecting
Brazil to Portugal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EllaLink
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EllaLink>
Part of Ellalink capacity will be dedicated exclusively to be used for
research purposes, as Ellalink will be instrumental to connect EU
research centers with the EU astronomical observatory in Chile
https://www.eso.org/public/about-eso/
<https://www.eso.org/public/about-eso/> to receive and analyse real
time ultrahigh definition images.
We invited the Ellalink’s CEO to know more about their governance
model. Will be able to talk about this at IGF.
All the best
Luca
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg
*Luca Belli, PhD*
/Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation/
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg+55
21 3799 *5763** **t*@1lucabelli <https://twitter.com/1lucabelli>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.j…
de Botafogo, 190 13º andar
Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg
luca.belli(a)fgv.br <mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>
http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpgintern…
<https://internet-governance.fgv.br/>
*De:*Leandro Navarro [mailto:leandro@pangea.org]
*Enviada em:* domingo, 28 de outubro de 2018 08:11
*Para:* Luca Belli <luca.belli(a)fgv.br>br>; Dynamic Coalition on Connected
Communities <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
*Cc:* Roger Baig Viñas <roger.baig(a)guifi.net>et>; Ramon Roca
<ramon.roca(a)guifi.net>
*Assunto:* Re: [DC3] Seminar on the Governance of Submarine Cables
Dear Luca,
Very interesting topic. Please share the conclusions with this forum.
It links with a presentation in the last IETF 102 in the GAIA WG. I
hope it helps to continue and elaborate the discussion about these
infrastructures. The slides:
http://people.ac.upc.edu/leandro/docs/ietf-102-universal.pdf
The issue is simple: the deployment of private infrastructures
(private submarine cables) over non-private areas (that literally or
conceptually belong to everyone and everything in this planet) should
have a return to everyone in the form of min/no cost open-access fibre
managed/governed as a commons.
Instead of an "abstract" monetary tax return for their deployment and
operation or profit, submarine cables should have a mandatory return
in terms of infrastructure sharing: open-access fibres managed as a
commons. Many stakeholders may be interested in it, but likewise
unlicensed radio-spectrum bands, a single/pair fibre has unlimited
potential for open-access communication under a commons governance.
Attached is a copy in English of version 14 of a document developed by
the
guifi.net Foundation that proposes "universal deployment" as a
template for municipal ordinance/regulation for municipalities in
Catalonia, that is the basis for my proposal/presentation in the IETF.
The current version (28) is in Catalan. Cc to Ramon Roca and Roger
Baig from the
guifi.net Foundation who have developed/coordinated this
document:
https://fundacio.guifi.net/en_US/page/documentos
Kind regards, Leandro.
On 27/10/18 20:50, Luca Belli wrote:
Hi all,
I remember some weeks ago it emerged interest in submarine cable,
on the list.
At FGV, we are going to host a day-long seminar on the Governance
of Submarine Cables, on Wednesday, in partnership with CGI.br, the
French Consulate, Internet Sans Frontières and the Brazilian
Consumer Protection Institute. See
https://www.cg.org.br/noticia/releases/seminario-inedito-sobre-operacao-e-u…
If anyone in the Rio area is interested, sejam benvindos :)
The event will be in Portuguese but our FGV fellow Félix Blanc
will be in Paris for the IGF (he is going to organise an IGF
workshop on the same topic) and I can put anyone interested in
contact with him to have further insight on our debates and on
future work, if anyone is interested.
All the best
Luca
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3