13 Nov
2019
13 Nov
'19
12:06 p.m.
Hi Marcelo, Jane, all,
I agree with Jane that as this process is open to all stakeholders it would
be good to get as many submissions as possible in from each of our
organizations. Basically submissions can be of any length and they need to
answer the questions included in the consultation. Those are:
1. How will new and emerging telecommunications/ICTs impact both the
internet and sustainable development, including the digital economy?
2. What are the opportunities and challenges for the adoption and growth
of the new and emerging telecommunications/ICTs and internet?
3. How can governments and the other stakeholders harness the benefits
of new and emerging telecommunications/ICTs?
4. What are the best practices for promoting human skills, institutional
capacity, innovation and investment for new and emerging
telecommunications/ICTs?
The details about how to submit are in the link shared by Marcelo:
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-oct2019.aspx
APC will be making one, aiming to submit it by the 13th Dec, to avoid last
minute changes over the holidays. If any of you feel that you prefer to
work collaboratively on that one rather than making your own, please write
me a private message to coordinate. Similarly, there will be a meeting of
Civil Society Organizations during the IGF Berlin discussing a strategy for
this, so if you are coming and interested in joining this meeting, reach
out in private as well.Likewise, if you or your organization are planning
to make an individual submission and think we can support in any way, feel
free to reach out too.
by the way, totally agree with you, Marcelo on the nuances between concepts
as well as in the need for more national influence.
best,
carlos
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 11:34, Instituto Bem Estar Brasil <
instituto(a)bemestarbrasil.org.br> wrote:
Hi Jane, totally agree...
About the national discussions over this PC on ITU, i perceived that we
need to strengthen the local incidence too. Even with the efforts of
ISOC Brasil, IBEBrasil and a few others to preserve the CN concepts, the
debate to insert small comercial providers as CNs was strong.
Then its important in this consultation to put these differences about
between one model and the other to avoid the kidnapping of the concepts
I know that this approach will need to be done diplomatically, then,
lets us keep talking strategically about this in national incidence too
BR
Marcelo Saldanha
Em 15/10/2019 19:10, Jane Coffin escreveu:
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-…
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
"Community and Local Access Networks" Project Coordinator
Association for Progressive Communications
https://www.apc.org/en/project/local-access-networks-can-unconnected-connec…
Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
Marcelo -
Thank you for this
It would be worth discussing a coalition strategy to get as many
responses in to
this proceeding __ when they ask for comments.
We used one of these consultations on IXPs to
inform governments,
provide information to people, and to speak about the issues at
the ITU
when they held an open meeting.
It goes a long way to provide good data to
people, and to get the
positive story out there!
Best,
Jane
Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org
Skype: janercoffin
Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
On 10/15/19, 4:40 PM, "dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf of
Instituto Bem Estar Brasil" <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net on behalf
of instituto(a)bemestarbrasil.org.br> wrote:
Hi everybody, here is the public consultation about (or not about
:-))
Community NetWorks...
https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultation-oct2019.aspx
I think that the debates push the issues to a more generic way
about the
concepts of who really is a CN.
With this position its possible to conclude that they choose the
middle
way. like Buda could said :-).
Lets participate.
BR
Marcelo Saldanha.
Em 23/09/2019 21:48, IBEBrasil escreveu:
> Hi Judith. Thks for the updates.
>
>
>
> Att,
> Marcelo Saldanha
> Instituto Bem Estar Brasil
>
> Hi Judith. Thks for the updates.Att,Marcelo SaldanhaInstituto Bem
Estar
Brasil
>
>
>
> -------- Mensagem original --------
> De: Judith Hellerstein <judith(a)jhellerstein.com>
> Data: 23/09/19 21:23 (GMT-03:00)
> Para: dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net
> Assunto: Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation about CNs
>
> HI Marcelo,
>
> The decision was made last Friday. I attended the ITU session
remotely.
> I posted the questions to the list
already
>
> Best,
>
> Judith
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> Hellerstein & Associates
> 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
> Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> E-mail:Judith@jhellerstein.com Website:www.jhellerstein.com
> Linked In:www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
> On 9/23/2019 8:18 PM, IBEBrasil wrote:
>> Hi Jane. I think that the decision will be made in this friday
about
>> the public consultation.
>>
>> https://www.itu.int/en/council/2019/Pages/default.aspx
>>
>> BR
>>
>>
>>
>> Att,
>> Marcelo Saldanha
>> Instituto Bem Estar Brasil
>>
>> -------- Mensagem original --------
>> De: Jane Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org>
>> Data: 23/09/19 18:49 (GMT-03:00)
>> Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
>> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> Assunto: Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation about CNs
>>
>> Hi All –
>>
>> Do we know what the result was from the ITU Council CWG Internet?
>>
>> I am hearing that CNs are on the agenda for comment from
>> February-September?
>>
>> Jane
>>
>> Internet Society | www.internetsociety.org
>>
>> Skype: janercoffin
>>
>> Mobile/WhatsApp: +1.202.247.8429
>>
>> *From: *<dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net> on behalf of Carlos
>> <carlos(a)apc.org>
>> *Reply-To: *Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
>> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> *Date: *Friday, September 6, 2019 at 1:36 PM
>> *To: *Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
>> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
>> *Subject: *Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation about CNs
>>
>> Hi Marcelo, thank you very much for flagging this and sharing the
>> text, very interesting data inside it.
>>
>> In the past CWG-Internet in February, both Canada and the UK
proposed
>> also community networks as a topic
for discussion. You can find
all
>> the contributions here:
https://www.itu.int/md/S19-RCLINTPOL12-C/en.
>> The countries who opposed community
networks at the plenipot also
>> blocked this from happening at the CWG other delegations
>>
>> With a strong country from the Global South like Brazil
submitting
it,
>> this time the result may be
different. Let's follow up the
result.
>>
>> best,
>>
>> carlos
>>
>> On 2019/09/05 18:58, Instituto Bem Estar Brasil wrote:
>>
>> Dear fellows I am writing here to ask for all of u to pay
>> attention about the public calls that the agencies are doing
in
>> the member states to make
suggestions to the public
consultation
>> of ITU about CNs
>>
>> I will share the doc with some suggestions, that the folks of
>> ISOC-BR and Luca helped to make it better :-) in the last
draft
of
>
Anatel.
>
> PS.: Remebering that this doc is it in the context of the
> brazilian contributions
>
> BR
>
> Marcelo Saldanha
> IBEBrasil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> DC3 mailing list
>
> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net <mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net
>>
>> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
>> Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
>> Association for Progressive Communications
>> >> Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
>> Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DC3 mailing list
>> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
>> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>
> -------- Mensagem original --------De: Judith Hellerstein <
judith(a)jhellerstein.com> Data: 23/09/19 21:23 (GMT-03:00) Para:
dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net Assunto: Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation
about CNs
> HI Marcelo,
> The decision was made last Friday. I attended the ITU session
> remotely. I posted the questions to the list already
> Best,
> Judith
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> Hellerstein & Associates
> 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
> Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> E-mail: Judith(a)jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com
> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
> On 9/23/2019 8:18 PM, IBEBrasil wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Jane. I think that the decision will be made in this
> friday about the public consultation.
>
>
> https://www.itu.int/en/council/2019/Pages/default.aspx
>
>
> BR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Att,
> Marcelo Saldanha
> Instituto Bem Estar Brasil
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Mensagem original --------
> De: Jane Coffin <coffin(a)isoc.org>
> Data: 23/09/19 18:49 (GMT-03:00)
> Para: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Assunto: Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation about CNs
>
>
>
>
> Hi All –
>
> Do we know
> what the result was from the ITU Council CWG
Internet?
> I am hearing
> that CNs are on the agenda for comment from
> February-September?
>
> Jane
>
>
>
>
> Internet Society |
> www.internetsociety.org
>
>
> Skype: janercoffin
>
>
> Mobile/WhatsApp:
> +1.202.247.8429
>
>
> From: <dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> on behalf of Carlos <carlos(a)apc.org>
> Reply-To: Dynamic Coalition on Community
> Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Date: Friday, September 6, 2019 at 1:36 PM
> To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
> <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
> Subject: Re: [DC3] ITU Public Consultation about
> CNs
>
>
>
>
> Hi Marcelo, thank you very much for flagging this and
sharing
> the text, very interesting
data inside it.
> In the past CWG-Internet in February, both Canada and
the UK
> proposed also community
networks as a topic for
discussion.
> You can find all the
contributions here:
https://www.itu.int/md/S19-RCLINTPOL12-C/en.
> The countries who opposed
community networks at the
plenipot
> also blocked this from
happening at the CWG other
delegations
> With a strong country from the
Global South like Brazil
> submitting it, this time the result may be different.
Let's
> follow up the result.
> best,
> carlos
>
>
> On 2019/09/05 18:58, Instituto Bem Estar
> Brasil wrote:
>
>
> Dear fellows I am writing here to ask for
> all of u to pay attention about the public calls
that the
> agencies are doing in the
member states to make
suggestions
> to the public consultation
of ITU about CNs
>
> I will share the doc with some suggestions, that the
folks
> of ISOC-BR and Luca helped
to make it better :-) in
the last
> draft of Anatel.
>
> PS.: Remebering that this doc is it in the context
of the
> brazilian contributions
>
> BR
>
> Marcelo Saldanha
> IBEBrasil
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DC3 mailing list
> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
> https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
>
> --
> Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
> Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
> Association for Progressive Communications
>
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-…
Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3