I thank Nicalas for raising the first square mile issue. It's part of the
larger rethinking of connectivity as infrastructure rather than networks.
For the purposes of submitting a declaration I'm not too concerned because
there is only so much one can do in writing. Hence the value in a workshop.
The basic problem is that very words we use to talk about connectivity
implicitly that networks are like railroads and we depend on third parties
for rides. Hence all the effort to petition "them" for better treatment and
few restrictions on what we can do with their networks. Even when they are
"our" networks it is still a sense of ownership just with the "people'
as
gatekeepers. The focus on access is part of this.
The big idea of "best efforts" means we can composite individual efforts
without having a network as such. Like having roads and sidewalks to
facilitate mobility. It is important to realize that we are not limited to
using roads and sidewalks - we got around millennia before they existed.
They just facilitate movement and transport. The flip side is that they
don't assure anything. Concepts like access and services are not part of the
infrastructure but rather way we use the common infrastructure.
What is important for empowerment is that anyone can contribute. Just as
important is that it is now "owned" by the community in the sense of the
ability to exclude but only in the sense of shared stewardship as when a
local board or government collects money and hires people to manage the
facilities. (Volunteering is a mechanism in lieu of cash).
One complicated factors is that today's Internet protocols and relationships
are very much old-paradigm and whatever we do should coexist just as a home
network coexists with telecom - we just buy a path through it. Calling that
path "access" is valid but misleading.
Again, this is a lot to unpack in email and I've said much of this before so
..
From: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] On Behalf Of Luca Belli
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 08:53
To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity <dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Subject: [DC3] Declaration on Community Connectivity v.0
Hi all,
I have tried to consolidate the ideas put forward in this list regarding a
Declaration to be presented at the IGF.
I have added the draft to the pad created by Nico to collect our ideas
https://pad.codigosur.org/GuadalajaraDeclaration
You can also find this "Draft Zero" in attachment.
Please, do not hesitate to share your comments on the draft or to modify the
text using the pad.
I suggest we submit this first draft to the IGF Secretariat, to signify that
we want it to be discussed during the IGF Main Session on Dynamic Coalitions
(see the Secretariat's email below). Then, we will have the next month to
discuss and modify/refine the text of the Declaration and submit a second
draft by 1 November (see email below). Lastly, we can discuss the
Declaration at our pre-IGF event, on 5 December. What do you think?
Please share your thoughts on this by 15 October, so that we have time to
elaborate a second draft and discuss it on the list.
All the best
Luca
<http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Marca_FGV_Direito_Ri
o.png>
Luca Belli, PhD
Senior Researcher
Head of Internet Governance @ FGV <http://internet-governance.fgv.br/>
luca.belli(a)fgv.br <mailto:luca.belli@fgv.br>
+55 21 3799 5763
<http://www.fgv.br/mailing/Direito_Rio/assinatura_email/Ondas.png>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eleonora Anna MAZZUCCHI < <mailto:EMAZZUCCHI@unog.ch>
EMAZZUCCHI(a)unog.ch>
Date: 5 September 2016 at 20:33
Subject: [DC3] IGF 2016 Main Session: Papers from DCs
To: <mailto:dc@intgovforum.org> dc(a)intgovforum.org
Cc: Markus Kummer < <mailto:kummer.markus@gmail.com>
kummer.markus(a)gmail.com>gt;, Avri Doria < <mailto:avri@acm.org> avri(a)acm.org>
Dear All,
Thank you for continuing to contribute to the planning for Dynamic
Coalitions' main session at IGF 2016!
With apologies for cross-posting (!), as we move closer to the meeting and
begin to refine the content of the session, all DCs should kindly note the
requirement to produce individual substantive papers. As agreed during DC
Coordination meetings, submission of the paper will be necessary for the DC
to participate in the main session. The deadline for a first draft is 30
September 2016.
Further details on the paper are included below this message and as an
attachment. The information is also available on the
<https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/dynamiccoalitions/dc-coordination> DCs
Coordination page, together with any other documents pertaining to main
session planning.
Please do not hesitate to reach out to the Secretariat for any questions or
feedback on this! We would be happy to help.
Very best,
Eleonora
IGF Secretariat
IGF 2016 DCs Main Session: Substantive Paper
During discussions in DC coordination meetings, it was agreed each DC would
produce a substantive paper by deadline in order to participate in the DCs
Main Session this year.
The papers will serve as collective background material for the session and
be put forward individually for feedback, both in advance of the IGF and
during the IGF itself. It was proposed and agreed that feedback be collected
through online and hard-copy DC issue surveys (or 'Idea Rating Sheets'),
piloted at IGF 2015.
Bearing in mind many DCs have produced substantive papers in years past, or
do so on a regular basis and introduce their work into other fora, the paper
for the main session can build on or be an updated version of any of this
previous work. It is only essential that the DC be able to cull from the
paper key ideas for discussion in the main session and for receiving
feedback before and during the meeting.
Timeline & Process for Main Session Paper
-The initial draft should be emailed to the Secretariat (
<mailto:emazzucchi@unog.ch> emazzucchi(a)unog.ch) by Friday, 30 September
2016, midnight UTC, for the DC to qualify for main session participation.
-A second draft, as well as the extraction of five key points for aligning
with the DC issue surveys, should be completed on/ about 1 November. This
also conforms with the deadline for the IGF Best Practice Forum (BPF)
outputs and with the general practice of submitting papers 6 weeks ahead of
a meeting.
-An email to the IGF community promoting the papers and the online version
of the DC issue surveys is sent on/ about 1 November.
-The DCs' shared IGF booth opens with the hard-copy version of the papers,
as well as DC issue surveys, from 6 December.
General Paper Guidelines
- The paper should not exceed 5 pages.
- Should not read as an "activities report" and should contain a few
thought-provoking issues/questions that can be put to IGF participants.
-Should be as inclusive as possible of the views and ideas of the DC's
constituent members .
For any questions/feedback please feel free to reach out to the Secretariat
at <mailto:emazzucchi@unog.ch> emazzucchi(a)unog.ch !
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
<mailto:DC3@listas.altermundi.net> DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
<https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3>
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3