6 Sep
2019
6 Sep
'19
11:36 a.m.
Hi Marcelo, thank you very much for flagging this and sharing the text,
very interesting data inside it.
In the past CWG-Internet in February, both Canada and the UK proposed
also community networks as a topic for discussion. You can find all the
contributions here: https://www.itu.int/md/S19-RCLINTPOL12-C/en. The
countries who opposed community networks at the plenipot also blocked
this from happening at the CWG other delegations
With a strong country from the Global South like Brazil submitting it,
this time the result may be different. Let's follow up the result.
best,
carlos
On 2019/09/05 18:58, Instituto Bem Estar Brasil wrote:
Dear fellows I am writing here to ask for all of u to
pay attention
about the public calls that the agencies are doing in the member
states to make suggestions to the public consultation of ITU about CNs
I will share the doc with some suggestions, that the folks of ISOC-BR
and Luca helped to make it better :-) in the last draft of Anatel.
PS.: Remebering that this doc is it in the context of the brazilian
contributions
BR
Marcelo Saldanha
IBEBrasil
_______________________________________________
DC3 mailing list
DC3(a)listas.altermundi.net
https://listas.altermundi.net/mailman/listinfo/dc3
--
Carlos Rey-Moreno, PhD
Local Access Policy and Regulation Coordinator
Association for Progressive Communications
https://www.apc.org/en/project/connecting-unconnected-supporting-community-…
Cel: +27 (0) 76 986 3633
Skype: carlos.reymoreno Twitter: Creym