13 Dec
2016
13 Dec
'16
5:20 a.m.
Hi All,
I just wanted to clarify on this that these conversations have been
initial talks and any kind of partnership will be previously discussed
with all DC3 members.
We have many things to do... but one step at a time!
--
Nicolás Pace
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nickar
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Bob Frankston
<Bob19-0501(a)bobf.frankston.com> wrote:
Sorry about the confusion. – I wasn’t commenting on
the DC3
report – just the explanation of Wi-Fi.
Just to add that I am supporting of the other Nicolás comment about
acknowledging that connectivity may be in different but it have
unintended consequences.
From: dc3-bounces(a)listas.altermundi.net
[mailto:dc3-bounces@listas.altermundi.net] On Behalf Of nicopace
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 01:17
To: Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity
<dc3(a)listas.altermundi.net>
Subject: Re: [DC3] Brief of meeting DC3-IFLA
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Bob Frankston
<Bob19-0501(a)bobf.frankston.com> wrote:
While many of the technical details of the report are correct one
must be wary about how the dots are connected.
I understand your concern.
For now, this is a draft that is not signed yet, and it is an
agreement between the individuals that have been part of the
conversation, not between institutions.
That being said, I trust that the commitment done by the
representatives is solid and they are commited to make this done.
Regards,