12 Aug
2018
12 Aug
'18
9:16 p.m.
On 08/09/2018 06:05 AM, Roger Baig Viñas wrote:
2) CNs definition: I would love to have one to because
I think the
term is being overused and might be even more in the future. But given
the previous attempts and the diversity of approaches I'm afraid we
won't be able to reach a common understanding.
Maybe we can all agree on some initial parameters, taking the DC3
declaration and some other input documents.
I dare say I particularly have a rather clear idea on
the criteria for
classifying initiatives the categories of "clearly yes", "maybe
yes/maybe not" and "definitely not". But this is for my particular use
and I would dare not impose these criteria to anybody.
Do you have this criteria written down somewhere?
I believe this can be an interesting point to discuss.
In the CNSIG case, I think we actually want to define our "limits", so
we can be inclusive without loosing focus. There are many groups that
work with "local access", which is a much broader concept.
Main question: given the previous attempts, is worth
to retake the
discussion to come up with a definition?
I believe it actually needs to be done, even though I agree that it can
be a pain ...
Cheers,
Nico