I really like this definition and believe it would resonate with Sudo
Mesh's understanding of what CNs are - I can bring it up at our next
meeting.. however -
Perhaps this is the kind of decision-based discussion that would best take
place on a Loomio instance? If you're seeking a majority/consensus of CNsig
representatives...
How is decision-making structured in this group, by the way? Is there a
formal governance model?
Cheers,
Jenny Ryan
People's Open Network <https://peoplesopen.net>
*Building a community-owned and -operated wireless network in Oakland,
California!*
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 2:16 PM Nicolás Echániz <nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net>
wrote:
On 08/09/2018 06:05 AM, Roger Baig Viñas wrote:
2) CNs definition: I would love to have one to
because I think the
term is being overused and might be even more in the future. But given
the previous attempts and the diversity of approaches I'm afraid we
won't be able to reach a common understanding.
Maybe we can all agree on some initial parameters, taking the DC3
declaration and some other input documents.
I dare say I particularly have a rather clear
idea on the criteria for
classifying initiatives the categories of "clearly yes", "maybe
yes/maybe not" and "definitely not". But this is for my particular use
and I would dare not impose these criteria to anybody.
Do you have this criteria written down somewhere?
I believe this can be an interesting point to discuss.
In the CNSIG case, I think we actually want to define our "limits", so
we can be inclusive without loosing focus. There are many groups that
work with "local access", which is a much broader concept.
Main question: given the previous attempts, is
worth to retake the
discussion to come up with a definition?
I believe it actually needs to be done, even though I agree that it can
be a pain ...
Cheers,
Nico
_______________________________________________
Council mailing list
Council(a)lists.cnsig.info
https://lists.cnsig.info/mailman/listinfo/council