23 Aug
2018
23 Aug
'18
6:46 p.m.
( I had sent this reply to Jenny only. Re-sending to the group)
On 08/13/2018 02:28 AM, Jenny Ryan wrote:> I really like this definition
and believe it would resonate with Sudo
Mesh's understanding of what CNs are - I can
bring it up at our next
meeting.. however -
Great, let us know what's the feedback from the meeting.
Perhaps this is the kind of decision-based discussion
that would
best take place on a Loomio instance? If you're seeking a
majority/consensus of CNsig representatives...
In my opinion, using the list has been OK so far... but we could explore
Loomio if we believe that the tool (e-mail) has been an impediment to
our decision making process.
How is decision-making structured in this group, by
the way? Is there
a formal governance model?
During our first meeting, we agreed on this procedure:
2.1. Operative decisions that can be retracted do not require prior
voting, just informing.
2.2. Procedure for decisions that need voting:
2.2.1. Decisions can be made over e-mail threads. E-mails must be marked
with [Decision]
2.2.2. Default timeframe for decisions is 5 days. It can be extended by
5 additional days upon request of council members.
2.2.3. If there are not enough votes (51% of organizations represented)
the decision cannot be made.
2.2.4. After 5 days, a Council officer will share the result of the
vote, what is the quorum, and other relevant details. The e-mail will be
marked with the tag [Decision reached]
2.2.5. Prioritized backlog with pending identified definitions will be
public and kept updated by Council officers.
Cheers,
Nico