On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 22:32 +0300, Nicolas Pace wrote:
> Amazing exchanges.
>
> fred, I like the concept of a colective ledger that is not based on
> proof of work... would be very interesting to understand how to use
> it
> deeper or even search for a community to do a trial.
>
> Ammbr still feels too distant... it is just a feeling.
>
> But for community networks having a local currency that they can
> define
> it's value i think it would be great to have something like that.
>
> The ledger could be managed in the nodes, or as a p2p network in
> the
> phones or computers.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 17:35 +0200, panayotis antoniadis wrote:
> > Hi fred,
> >
> > Ammbr is a new project jumping on the "Initial Coin Offering
> > (ICO)"
> > trend, and this is what I meant by "speculation".
> >
> > They have produced a white paper which is also somehow
> > speculative
> > and
> > marketing oriented leaving out many key challenges and technical
> > details
> > for implementing the underlying vision (in short, no prototype is
> > available).
> >
> > However, the concept is obviously interesting and since the
> > details
> > make
> > a difference worth thinking carefully about some of them, like
> > the
> > convertibility of the currency with "fiat money", how to ensure
> > liquidity, and other important currency design issues that do not
> > have
> > to do with computer engineering.
> >
> > I will share soon a related paper that we are writing with
> > Leandro
> > Navarro for
Guifi.net on some interesting analogies and possible
> > synergies between community currencies (which have a long history
> > before
> > bitcoin) and community networks.
> >
> > The LibrePod is very beautiful!
> >
> > And if there is interest in this list about this topic I will be
> > sharing
> > some hopefully interesting material ...
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Panos.
> >
> > On 23.10.2017 17:08, fred wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Thanks for Ammbr link,
> > > do they have a working prototype to show?
> > >
> > > In my case, to reduce proof of work extra power consumption,
> > > I was thinking about using free money project from Duniter
> > >
https://duniter.org/en/ (money is member generated instead of
> > > blockchain
> > > mining).
> > >
> > > Prototyping it on a "LibrePod" conceived in
http://redport.cl/
> > > Adding P2P services. Like document sharing & media center +
> > > social
> > > network service + device charging service...
> > >
> > > I am willing to make the project in collaboration with Dominica
> > > Governement as a Mesh Network service to rebuild after
> > > Hurricane.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 21/10/2017 à 01:59, Nicolas Pace a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 17:28 +0200, panayotis antoniadis
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps you have heard of Ammbr?
http://ammbr.com/
> > > > > It seems highly relevant for this discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Personally I have many reservations for a scheme that
> > > > > combines
> > > > > speculation with sharing :-)
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't need to conceive speculation... that is there by
> > > > design...
> > > > there could be a currency that doesn't include speculation as
> > > > part of
> > > > its model.
> > > >
> > > > > But perhaps there are some gains to be made (e.g., public
> > > > > awareness
> > > > > and
> > > > > pressure for better legislation) if big players enter in
> > > > > this
> > > > > ecosystem.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure, and I would be actually interested in your
> > > > > opinion ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Panos.
> > > > >
http://nethood.org/panayotis/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 20.10.2017 16:11, Nicolas Pace wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 09:59 +0200, fred wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had to conduct an analysis on blockchain technology
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > realize
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > it is disruptive and could be a way to conduct ICO
> > > > > > > (initial
> > > > > > > coin
> > > > > > > offering) campaigns.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This makes me think about a way to find a solution to
> > > > > > > provide
> > > > > > > "bank
> > > > > > > service" on mesh networks and find fundings and
> > > > > > > contributors to
> > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > LibreMesh technology to spread...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am submitting my thoughts on this mailing list to
> > > > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > about.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This would be very interesting... but usually mantaining
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > blockchain
> > > > > > requires a lot of storage and CPU power... routers might
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > be the
> > > > > > best fit for it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, thinking of local digital ledgers for local
> > > > > > digital
> > > > > > currencies
> > > > > > is a very interesting topic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > lime-users mailing list
> > > > > > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> > > > > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > lime-users mailing list
> > > > > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> > > > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > lime-users mailing list
> > > > > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> > > > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lime-users mailing list
> > > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users