23 Oct
2017
23 Oct
'17
3:08 p.m.
Hi
Thanks for Ammbr link,
do they have a working prototype to show?
In my case, to reduce proof of work extra power consumption,
I was thinking about using free money project from Duniter
https://duniter.org/en/ (money is member generated instead of blockchain
mining).
Prototyping it on a "LibrePod" conceived in http://redport.cl/
Adding P2P services. Like document sharing & media center + social
network service + device charging service...
I am willing to make the project in collaboration with Dominica
Governement as a Mesh Network service to rebuild after Hurricane.
Cheers
Le 21/10/2017 à 01:59, Nicolas Pace a écrit :
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 17:28 +0200, panayotis
antoniadis wrote:
Hi all,
Perhaps you have heard of Ammbr? http://ammbr.com/
It seems highly relevant for this discussion.
Personally I have many reservations for a scheme that combines
speculation with sharing :-)
It doesn't need to conceive speculation... that is there by design...
there could be a currency that doesn't include speculation as part of
its model.
> But perhaps there are some gains to be made (e.g., public awareness
> and
> pressure for better legislation) if big players enter in this
> ecosystem.
>
> I am not sure, and I would be actually interested in your opinion ...
>
> Best,
>
> Panos.
> http://nethood.org/panayotis/
>
>
> On 20.10.2017 16:11, Nicolas Pace wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 09:59 +0200, fred wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I had to conduct an analysis on blockchain technology and realize
>>> that
>>> it is disruptive and could be a way to conduct ICO (initial coin
>>> offering) campaigns.
>>>
>>> This makes me think about a way to find a solution to provide
>>> "bank
>>> service" on mesh networks and find fundings and contributors to
>>> help
>>> LibreMesh technology to spread...
>>>
>>> I am submitting my thoughts on this mailing list to discuss
>>> about.
>>
>> This would be very interesting... but usually mantaining a
>> blockchain
>> requires a lot of storage and CPU power... routers might not be the
>> best fit for it.
>>
>> However, thinking of local digital ledgers for local digital
>> currencies
>> is a very interesting topic.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users