Let's put Wednesday 29th 00:00 UTC as deadline for voting.
New names only accepted until 28th 12:00 UTC.
My proposal is maximum two votes per person.
Please use a name which can be recognized as participant of this mailing
list or the IRC freenode channel.
Cheers.
On 27/03/17 16:22, Paul Spooren wrote:
RoutingRevolution
Am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Nk:
> Hi all! Awesome news!
>
> All of our team has been on a brainstorming loop over this topic this
> morning as soon as we read the mail and these are the ideas that have
> been tossed around ;]
>
> With a *D*:
>
> *Distributed Dawning* [or *Decentralized* as @Amusa suggested] **
> *Disruptive Development*
> *Dynamic Diversity*
>
> [*Distributed* as the most extreme level as *decentralization*, also a
> very cool term as @Amusa pointed out]
> [I love this definition of *Dawning*: To begin to appear or develop;
> emerge.]
> [*Diversity*: Using multiple antennae to reduce interference and
> improve both transmission and reception of signals.]
>
> With an *R*:
>
> *Recursive Resonance*
> *Redundant Rebirth*
> *Resonant Reboot*
> *
> *
> [*Resonance*: Mechanical resonance is the tendency of a mechanical
> system to respond at greater amplitude when the frequency of its
> oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its
> resonance frequency or resonant frequency) than it does at other
> frequencies.]
>
> Some are rather self-ironically nerdy of course, but isn’t that the
> point? ;]
>
>
> On 27 mar 2017, 15:18 +0200, bruno vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com>om>, wrote:
>> we have a winner!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>>> DecentralizedDeity
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/03/17 18:05, Pau wrote:
>>>
>>> Last weeks a group of us have been working on LibreMesh to deliver what
>>> will be the next release based on LEDE 17.01. For such purpose some of
>>> us have moved to a rural area of Argentina where exist a Community
>>> Network made of 70 nodes (approx). We are testing the new firmware
>>> here,
>>> finding and fixing problems which are only observable when there is
>>> real
>>> user data. So we expect this new release to be the most stable and
>>> reliable until now.
>>>
>>> Probably this week we will publish the first candidate but we are still
>>> missing something important... the name.
>>>
>>> Until now we were trying to follow the name rules used by OpenWRT (AA,
>>> BB, CC, ...), so what we had was:
>>>
>>> - BigBang
>>> - CommunityChaos
>>>
>>> Then this one should be named DD. But as OpenWRT is kind of abandoned
>>> and now we are using LEDE, maybe we should also change the name rules
>>> (¿maybe?). The LEDE release is named "Reboot". So names related
with
>>> Reboot or starting with 'R' would be also an option.
>>>
>>> In any case we are open to any idea.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lime-users mailing list
>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lime-users mailing list
>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
>>
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
>> skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
./p4u
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org