11 Dec
2018
11 Dec
'18
3:13 p.m.
I agree we would get a better performance using different hardware. That
is what I would do if I want to optimize performance in my network.
But, if you want to accomplish the dizzying difficult mission of
spreading Free Networks around the world, it sounds good to me to let
people have the opportunity to install -if they want- in their router a
piece of software (which otherwise they would probably never install in
an always-on dedicated hardware) that would let users feel distributed
apps work ok.
Marcos:
It sounds interesting, but I think it's a mistake
to mix infrastructure and
CDN in the same hardware layer. Let's think about the legal issues, about
the exposed that is the hardware of mesh wifi networks as well as to have
contents. It seems to me that the best thing is not to add points of
failure to the most sensitive point of the network (access points and
backbones) and to think of the devices that are connected as the elements
that really have the contents. At most think of other hardware, that is
easily added to our networks, that uses its advantages of mesh network, and
that fulfills the function of pubs, CDN, etc.
El mar., 11 dic. 2018 a las 10:48, amuza (<amuza(a)riseup.net>) escribió:
Both Luandro's answer and yours seem
promising news towards network
freedom.
Software like Scuttlebutt and Retroshare is perfect for community
networks. The main problem with these distributed apps is you want to
have an always-on friend Retroshare-node/Scuttlebutt-Pub to route and
let asynchronous communication happen. That would not be such a problem
if the router you connect to is also the always-on friend
RS-node/SSB-Pub you need.
If those who run community routers, would also run its embedded
always-on RS-node/SSB-Pub, that might become into a synergistic boost
for both community networks and distributed apps.
Gio:
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
RetroShare could be probably compiled without
much problems for openwrt
too,
what are you thinking to do?
On Monday, 10 December 2018 12:48:00 CET amuza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thinking out loud as I'm not going to do it (I don't even know if
> that is possible), but it would be nice to be able to install a basic
> Retroshare (to act as a relay) or a ScuttleButt Pub in a Libremesh
> router, wouldn't it?
>
> Ilario Gelmetti:
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [Battlemesh] GSoC 2019 announced (Battlemesh Digest, Vol 104,
>> Issue 7)
>> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:16:35 +0100
>> From: Andreas Br?u <ab(a)andi95.de>
>> Reply-To: battlemesh(a)ml.ninux.org
>> To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh(a)ml.ninux.org>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> on Tuesday Google announce GSoC 2019. Org applications will start on
>> January 15 2019. Until then we have time to update the projects page at
>> https://projects.freifunk.net/#/projects
>>
>> Please add new ideas to the page, update the existing or delete the
>> obsolete ones. Changes to the projects can be made at
>> https://github.com/freifunk/projects.freifunk.net-contents
>>
>> You can find the timeline at
>> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>>
>> If you have any questions, please get in touch with me or write an
email
> to
gsoc-org-admins(a)freifunk.net
>
> Best regards,
>
> Andi
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users