Nk
On May 10, 2017, 3:37 PM +0200, Nicolas Pace <nico(a)libre.ws>ws>, wrote:
On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 15:34 +0200, Nk via
lime-users wrote:
AHAHAHAH epic.
Thanks Ilario, sorry to bother. My tests were first router’s LAN
to
second router’s WAN, and that wasn’t working. Are you saying they
should be connected LAN to LAN [as an alternative to WAN to WAN
which
we know works perfectly]? Wouldn’t that cause a DHCP conflict?
Not at all. That is the default behaviour of LibreMesh (crazy,
right?
:) ).
> Thank you.
>
> Nk
>
> On May 10, 2017, 3:33 PM +0200, Ilario Gelmetti <iochesonome@gmai
> l.co
> m>, wrote:
> > On 05/10/2017 02:20 PM, Nikksno via lime-users wrote:
> > > If I use the eth1 of the first router to mesh with other
> > > routers
> > > as
> > > you're suggesting, the problem is that the meshing doesn't
> > > seem
> > > to
> > > happen correctly, as bmx6 shows the second router's route as
> > > being eth1,
> > > but batman shows all routes to other nodes being over wlan
> > > mesh,
> > > even to
> > > the second router.
> >
> > It's not lan, it's not wan...
> > It's BATWAN nananananananananananananananana batwaaaaaannn
> >
> > No, seriously, I expected batman was present on ethernet LAN
> > interfaces...
> > They're also included in br-lan which is included in bat0, no?
> >
> > Can you post these?
> > # brctl show
> > # batctl if
> >
> > I agree with nicopace, lan to lan should work.
> > @devs pls? Are ethernet ports with LAN proto not used by
> > batman-
> > adv?
> > _______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org