23 Mar
2018
23 Mar
'18
11:12 a.m.
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
23 Mar
23 Mar
11:44 a.m.
Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the question posed,
but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think of this as a
+1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
12:42 p.m.
At Coolab we have been struggling with this question for a long time since
we believe it is essential to make use of local networks as a local
communications tool.
But, alas, all we have to work for now is a temporary hack that has already
3 years!
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to collaborate
to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen in
less than 6 months or so.
The standard nodogsplash also won't work because of the several gateway
interfaces that LiMe uses. So back in 2015, Gui made a horrible hack
(that's actually the name of it, horrible) to get it to work and that's
what we have been using since then. The problem is, it wouldn't install in
version 17 of LiMe - different package formats, different firewall rules...
So finally only a few days we fixed these issues and managed to hack the
configuration enough to get it working again. It would be a very good time
for other users to test it - even though, you know, it is temporary.
I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and send it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Not that I can provide any useful information to
answer the question
posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think of
this as a +1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
1:01 p.m.
On 23/03/18 13:42, bruno vianna wrote:
At Coolab we have been struggling with this question
for a long time
since we believe it is essential to make use of local networks as a
local communications tool.
But, alas, all we have to work for now is a temporary hack that has
already 3 years!
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
collaborate to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it
will happen in less than 6 months or so.
The standard nodogsplash also won't work because of the several
gateway interfaces that LiMe uses. So back in 2015, Gui made a
horrible hack (that's actually the name of it, horrible) to get it to
work and that's what we have been using since then. The problem is, it
wouldn't install in version 17 of LiMe - different package formats,
different firewall rules...
So finally only a few days we fixed these issues and managed to hack
the configuration enough to get it working again. It would be a very
good time for other users to test it - even though, you know, it is
temporary.
I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and
send it to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Cool! Looking forward to test it.
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com
<mailto:psharmor@gmail.com>> wrote:
Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the
question posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as
well! Think of this as a +1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net
<mailto:amuza@riseup.net>> wrote:
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It
would be a
welcome page with some community news, not real
authentication. I guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just
clicked an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month.
So they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can
try to make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as
I think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
--
bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com> ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/> ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
24 Mar
24 Mar
1:59 p.m.
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
collaborate
to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
in
less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to create Pitbull,
maybe we can attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more people to
participate, we will have a clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this first
draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal software to enable
community functions such as local bulletin boards and network access control. We call on
people with Lua programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post questions and comments there. For more read
communication, visit our matrix chat room at -insert address here-. We also call on people
interested in testing the captive portal software as we develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks at least opens the
chance of other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute much in
that task. Testing I think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of value to our networks
and make them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives to non-community
networks, offering tools and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and send
it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we started over a year
ago. I look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to libremesh 17).
Patrick
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Not that I can provide any useful information to
answer the question
posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
of
this as a +1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
a
> welcome page with some community news, not
real authentication. I
guess
> we would like a system where MAC addresses of
users who just clicked
an
> "Ok" button of the splash page
would be validated for a month. So
they
> would have to go through this News page once
a month.
>
> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
make
> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask
about Pitbull, as I
think
>> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
>>
>> What is the status of Pitbull?
>>
>> Would it work for the described need?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> 
25 Mar
25 Mar
11:38 p.m.
Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be a tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs" <patricio(a)altermundi.net>
escribió:
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna
<bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace.
We started to
collaborate
to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
in
less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to create Pitbull, maybe we
can
attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more people to participate, we
will have a
clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this first draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal software to enable
community
functions such as local bulletin boards and network access control. We call on people
with Lua
programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull
and post
questions and comments there. For more read communication, visit our matrix chat room at
-insert
address here-. We also call on people interested in testing the captive portal software
as we
develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks at least opens the
chance of
other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute much in
that task. Testing I
think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of value to our networks
and make
them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives to non-community networks,
offering tools
and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
I'll work on an English documentation of the
hack this weekend and send
it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we started over a year
ago. I
look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to libremesh 17).
Patrick
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Not that I can provide any useful information to
answer the question
posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
of
this as a +1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
27 Mar
27 Mar
10:40 p.m.
Agreed! Let's hope Nico will find the time to guide us through this process.
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be a
tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs" <patricio(a)altermundi.net>
escribió:
Pitbull,
maybe we can
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno
vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com>
escribió:
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace.
We started to
collaborate
to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
in
less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to create attract more developers. And even if we
don't attract more people to
participate, we will have a
clearer understanding of the work. Who can
improve this first draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal
software to
enable community
functions such as local bulletin boards and
network access control. We
call on people with Lua
programming experience to look at our GitHub repo
at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
questions and comments there. For more read
communication, visit our
matrix chat room at -insert
address here-. We also call on people interested
in testing the captive
portal software as we
develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks at
least
opens the chance of
other people joining the effort... Nothing to
lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute
much in that task. Testing I
think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of value
to our
networks and make
them more attractive and more viable as real
alternatives to
non-community networks, offering tools
and social dynamics that non-community networks
cannot offer.
started over
a year ago. I
I'll work on an English documentation of the
hack this weekend and send
it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes
to libremesh 17).
Patrick
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
Bruno
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Not that I can provide any useful information to
answer the question
posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
of
this as a +1!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
2 Apr
2 Apr
6:54 p.m.
Hey bruno, it works!! Thank you. Just tried with one Internet exit.
Thanks for the good documentation.
I had been waiting long for this, but now I am experiencing and
understanding much better many of the things everyone was telling me in
a Github issue I opened some time ago [0].
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is
also the problems people will face when using the connection for apps
different than a browser.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread: capturing only port 80
traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified
version of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current
Nodogsplash version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the
configuration file.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port 80"?
[0] https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/issues/76
On 28/03/18 00:40, bruno vianna wrote:
Agreed! Let's hope Nico will find the time to
guide us through this
process.
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org
<mailto:modante@disroot.org>> wrote:
Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be a tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs"
<patricio(a)altermundi.net> escribió:
create
Pitbull, maybe we can
since we started
over a year ago. I
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno
vianna
<bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com>> escribió:
> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
> collaborate
> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will
happen
in
less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to attract more developers. And even if we
don't attract more
people to participate, we will have a
clearer understanding of the work. Who can
improve this first
draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive
portal software
to enable community
functions such as local bulletin boards and
network access
control. We call on people with Lua
programming experience to look at our GitHub repo
at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull
<https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull> and post
questions and comments there. For more read
communication, visit
our matrix chat room at -insert
address here-. We also call on people interested
in testing the
captive portal software as we
develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our
networks at least
opens the chance of
other people joining the effort... Nothing to
lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can
contribute
much in that task. Testing I
think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot
of value to our
networks and make
them more attractive and more viable as real
alternatives to
non-community networks, offering tools
and social dynamics that non-community networks
cannot offer.
> I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend
and
send
it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes
to libremesh 17).
Patrick
> Bruno
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor
<psharmor(a)gmail.com
<mailto:psharmor@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the
question
>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this
become a reality as well!
Think
>
> of
>> this as a +1!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
> a
> welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
> guess
> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just
clicked
> an
> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
> they
> would have to go through this News page once a month.
>
> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
> make
> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
> think
> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
>
> What is the status of Pitbull?
>
> Would it work for the described need?
>
> Thank you!
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users>
--
bruno(a)pobox.com âââââââââ
http://brunovianna.net
<http://brunovianna.net/> âââââââââââ
skype: randomicoââââââââââââââââââââ
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
4 Apr
4 Apr
5:29 p.m.
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is also
the problems people will face when using the
connection for apps different
than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is smart
enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login page. Even
firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread:
capturing only port 80
traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified version
of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash
version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on port
https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would never end up
in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by creating
VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the best solution.
I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see things
like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port 80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that something
like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the
nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be
a tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs" <
<patricio(a)altermundi.net>
patricio(a)altermundi.net> escribió:
Pitbull,
maybe we can
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
<bruno@pobox.com>bruno@pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─â–
ˆâ–Œâ–ˆâ–Œ
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno
vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com>
escribió:
Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace.
We started to
collaborate
to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
in
less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to create attract more developers. And even if we
don't attract more people to
participate, we will have a
clearer understanding of the work. Who can
improve this first draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal
software to
enable community
functions such as local bulletin boards and
network access control. We
call on people with Lua
programming experience to look at our GitHub repo
at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
questions and comments there. For more read
communication, visit our
matrix chat room at -insert
address here-. We also call on people interested
in testing the captive
portal software as we
develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks at
least
opens the chance of
other people joining the effort... Nothing to
lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute
much in that task. Testing I
think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of value
to our
networks and make
them more attractive and more viable as real
alternatives to
non-community networks, offering tools
and social dynamics that non-community networks
cannot offer.
started over
a year ago. I
I'll work on an English documentation of the
hack this weekend and send
it
to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes
to libremesh 17).
Patrick
> Bruno
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the question
>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
>
> of
>> this as a +1!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza < <amuza(a)riseup.net>
amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hello,
Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
a
welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
guess
we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
an
"Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
they
would have to go through this News page once a month.
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
make
it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
think
that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
What is the status of Pitbull?
Would it work for the described need?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
17 Aug
17 Aug
9:37 a.m.
Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default what
I need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there
is also the problems people will face when using the connection
for apps different than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is
smart enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login
page. Even firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread: capturing only
port 80 traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a
modified version of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least
in the current Nodogsplash version) it seems possible to do it
just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on
port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would
never end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by
creating VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the
best solution. I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but
port 80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that
something like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
> In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the nodogsplash hack.
> Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
>
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
> <http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
> Have fun!
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM,
<modante(a)disroot.org
> <mailto:modante@disroot.org>> wrote:
> Absolutely agree. I am not
developer but could be a tester :-)
> 24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs"
> <patricio(a)altermundi.net <mailto:patricio@altermundi.net> > escribió:
> > El 23 de marzo de 2018
7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna
> <bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com>> escribió:
> > >> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico
Pace. We
> started to
> >> collaborate
> >> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it
> will happen
> >> in
> >> less than 6 months or so.
> > > If we write
a brief description of the skills and work
> needed to create Pitbull, maybe we can
> > attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more
> people to participate, we will have a
> > clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this
> first draft?:
> > > *The
LibreMesh community will soon start working on a
> captive portal software to enable community
> > functions such as local bulletin boards and network access
> control. We call on people with Lua
> > programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
> https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull
> <https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull> and post
> > questions and comments there. For more read communication,
> visit our matrix chat room at -insert
> > address here-. We also call on people interested in testing
> the captive portal software as we
> > develop it.*
> > > Improving
this call to action and distributing it among our
> networks at least opens the chance of
> > other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
> > > (I'm
willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can
> contribute much in that task. Testing I
> > think I can do.)
> > > I think
these creations, such as the captive portal, add a
> lot of value to our networks and make
> > them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives
> to non-community networks, offering tools
> > and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
> > >>
I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this
> weekend and send
> >> it
> >> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
> > > Great! Our
community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal
> since we started over a year ago. I
> > look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to
> libremesh 17).
> > > Patrick
> > >> Bruno
> > > >> On
Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor
> <psharmor(a)gmail.com <mailto:psharmor@gmail.com> > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
Not that I can provide any useful information to answer
> the question
> >>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as
> well! Think
> > > >> of
> >>> this as a +1!
> >> >
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net
> <mailto:amuza@riseup.net>> wrote:
> > > >>
Hello,
> > > >> Here
we are considering again the captive portal thing. It
> would be
> >> a
> >> welcome page with some community news, not real
> authentication. I
> >> guess
> >> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who
> just clicked
> >> an
> >> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a
> month. So
> >> they
> >> would have to go through this News page once a month.
> > > >>
I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I
> can try to
> >> make
> >> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull,
> as I
> >> think
> >> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
> > > >> What
is the status of Pitbull?
> > > >>
Would it work for the described need?
> > > >>
Thank you!
> > > >>
_______________________________________________
> >> lime-users mailing list
> >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> <https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users > >>>
_______________________________________________
> >>> lime-users mailing list
> >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> <https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users > > > _______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> <https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >
_______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> <https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> --
> bruno(a)pobox.com
<mailto:bruno@pobox.com> ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
> http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/ > ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
> skype:
> randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
>
_______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> <https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
<https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com> ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/> ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
2:12 p.m.
yes! let us know if it will work on lime
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:37 AM amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default what I
need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is also
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
the problems people will face when using the
connection for apps different
than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is smart
enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login page. Even
firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread:
capturing only port 80
traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified version
of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash
version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on
port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would never
end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by creating
VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the best solution.
I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see
things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port
80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that something
like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the
nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be
a tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs" <patricio(a)altermundi.net>
escribió:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico
▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno
vianna <
bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
> collaborate
> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
> in
> less than 6 months or so.
If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to
create Pitbull,
maybe we can
attract more developers. And even if we
don't attract more people to
participate, we will have a
clearer understanding of the work. Who can
improve this first draft?:
*The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal
software to
enable community
functions such as local bulletin boards and
network access control. We
call on people with Lua
programming experience to look at our GitHub repo
at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
questions and comments there. For more read
communication, visit our
matrix chat room at -insert
address here-. We also call on people interested
in testing the
captive portal software as we
develop it.*
Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks
at least
opens the chance of
other people joining the effort... Nothing to
lose.
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute
much in that task. Testing I
think I can do.)
I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of
value to our
networks and make
them more attractive and more viable as real
alternatives to
non-community networks, offering tools
and social dynamics that non-community networks
cannot offer.
> I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and
send
> it
> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we
started over
a year ago. I
look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes
to libremesh 17).
Patrick
> Bruno
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the question
>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
>
> of
>> this as a +1!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
> a
> welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
> guess
> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
> an
> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
> they
> would have to go through this News page once a month.
>
> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
> make
> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
> think
> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
>
> What is the status of Pitbull?
>
> Would it work for the described need?
>
> Thank you!
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
19 Aug
19 Aug
11:38 p.m.
Hi,
I tested it taking into account Bruno's guide for old Nodogsplash on
LiMe [0] and the new official documentation of new Nodogsplash [1] [2].
But could not make it work, I could access http pages without being
captured by Nodogsplash.
Perhaps it is related to a note in the documentation [3] reading "/At
the time of writing, Nodogsplash has been tested with OpenWrt 18.06.0;
it may or may not work on older versions of OpenWrt or on other kinds of
Linux-based router firmware./"
[0] http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
[1] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
[2]
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/blob/master/resources/nodogsplas…
[3] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html
On 17/08/18 16:12, bruno vianna wrote:
yes! let us know if it will work on lime
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:37 AM amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net
<mailto:amuza@riseup.net>> wrote:
Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default
what I need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and
there is also the problems people will face when using the
connection for apps different than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is
smart enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login
page. Even firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread: capturing
only port 80 traffic and letting everything else flow. He
mentioned a modified version of tinyproxy to do that. However
I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash version) it seems
possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is
now on port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook
(mercy!) would never end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by
creating VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is
the best solution. I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything
but port 80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that
something like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
> In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the nodogsplash
> hack.
> Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
>
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
> Have fun!
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38
PM, <modante(a)disroot.org
> <mailto:modante@disroot.org>> wrote:
> Absolutely agree. I am not
developer but could be a
> tester :-)
> 24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs"
> <patricio(a)altermundi.net
> <mailto:patricio@altermundi.net>> escribió:
> > El 23 de marzo de
2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna
> <bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com>> escribió:
> > >> Pitbull is not useful yet according to
Nico Pace. We
> started to
> >> collaborate
> >> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem
> like it will happen
> >> in
> >> less than 6 months or so.
> > > If
we write a brief description of the skills and work
> needed to create Pitbull, maybe we can
> > attract more developers. And even if we don't attract
> more people to participate, we will have a
> > clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve
> this first draft?:
> > > *The
LibreMesh community will soon start working on a
> captive portal software to enable community
> > functions such as local bulletin boards and network
> access control. We call on people with Lua
> > programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
> https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
> > questions and comments there. For more read
> communication, visit our matrix chat room at -insert
> > address here-. We also call on people interested in
> testing the captive portal software as we
> > develop it.*
> > >
Improving this call to action and distributing it
> among our networks at least opens the chance of
> > other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
> > >
(I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I
> can contribute much in that task. Testing I
> > think I can do.)
> > > I
think these creations, such as the captive portal,
> add a lot of value to our networks and make
> > them more attractive and more viable as real
> alternatives to non-community networks, offering tools
> > and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot
> offer.
> > >>
I'll work on an English documentation of the hack
> this weekend and send
> >> it
> >> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
> > >
Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive
> portal since we started over a year ago. I
> > look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to
> libremesh 17).
> > >
Patrick
> > >>
Bruno
> > >
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor
> <psharmor(a)gmail.com <mailto:psharmor@gmail.com> > >> wrote:
> > >
>>> Not that I can provide any useful information to
> answer the question
> >>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a
> reality as well! Think
> > >
>> of
> >>> this as a +1!
> >> >
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net
> <mailto:amuza@riseup.net>> wrote:
> > >
>> Hello,
> > >
>> Here we are considering again the captive portal
> thing. It would be
> >> a
> >> welcome page with some community news, not real
> authentication. I
> >> guess
> >> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users
> who just clicked
> >> an
> >> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for
> a month. So
> >> they
> >> would have to go through this News page once a month.
> > >
>> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again,
> so I can try to
> >> make
> >> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about
> Pitbull, as I
> >> think
> >> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
> > >
>> What is the status of Pitbull?
> > >
>> Would it work for the described need?
> > >
>> Thank you!
> > >
>> _______________________________________________
> >> lime-users mailing list
> >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lime-users mailing list
> >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> > >
_______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org > >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> --
> bruno(a)pobox.com
<mailto:bruno@pobox.com >
▀─█▄██▄▀▄
> http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/ > ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
> skype:
> randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
>
_______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org >
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com> ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/> ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
<mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-users@lists.libremesh.org>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com <mailto:bruno@pobox.com> ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net <http://brunovianna.net/> ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users 
20 Aug
20 Aug
1:11 a.m.
I've been hacking at this, and finally got it working and am now using it
here in my community as of today. I wrote a script
<https://github.com/luandro/libre-portal/blob/master/beta/install-voucher.sh>
to automate installing it here, but it might not work out-of-the-box for
you.It's good reference to get it working. There also a nice tool to
administrate the vouchers here
<https://github.com/coolabnet/VoucherAdmin-v2.0>.
The portal has worked so far for most devices, only an old Android device
didn't show any portal. My next step is to try and serve stuff from a
single-board-computer running a server thru the portal, in order to be able
to share large files.
Em dom, 19 de ago de 2018 às 20:39, amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> escreveu:
Hi,
I tested it taking into account Bruno's guide for old Nodogsplash on LiMe
[0] and the new official documentation of new Nodogsplash [1] [2]. But
could not make it work, I could access http pages without being captured by
Nodogsplash.
Perhaps it is related to a note in the documentation [3] reading "*At the
time of writing, Nodogsplash has been tested with OpenWrt 18.06.0; it may
or may not work on older versions of OpenWrt or on other kinds of
Linux-based router firmware.*"
[0] http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
[1] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
[2]
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/blob/master/resources/nodogsplas…
[3] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html
On 17/08/18 16:12, bruno vianna wrote:
yes! let us know if it will work on lime
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:37 AM amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default what I
need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users also the problems people will face when using the
connection for apps
different than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is smart
enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login page. Even
firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread:
capturing only port 80
traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified version
of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash
version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on
port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would never
end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by creating
VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the best solution.
I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see
things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port
80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that something
like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the
nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be
a tester :-)
24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs" <patricio(a)altermundi.net>
escribió:
> El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna <
bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
>
>> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
>> collaborate
>> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will happen
>> in
>> less than 6 months or so.
>
> If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to
create Pitbull, maybe we can
> attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more people to
participate, we will have a
> clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this first draft?:
>
> *The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal
software to enable community
> functions such as local bulletin boards and network access control.
We call on people with Lua
> programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
> questions and comments there. For more read communication, visit our
matrix chat room at -insert
> address here-. We also call on people interested in testing the
captive portal software as we
> develop it.*
>
> Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks
at least opens the chance of
> other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
>
> (I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute
much in that task. Testing I
> think I can do.)
>
> I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of
value to our networks and make
> them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives to
non-community networks, offering tools
> and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
>
>> I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and
send
>> it
>> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
>
> Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we
started over a year ago. I
> look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to libremesh 17).
>
> Patrick
>
>> Bruno
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the question
>>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well! Think
>>
>> of
>>> this as a +1!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
>> a
>> welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
>> guess
>> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
>> an
>> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
>> they
>> would have to go through this News page once a month.
>>
>> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
>> make
>> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
>> think
>> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
>>
>> What is the status of Pitbull?
>>
>> Would it work for the described need?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lime-users mailing list
>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico
▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
21 Aug
21 Aug
1:31 p.m.
But, just to clarify - Luandro used the old version of Nodogsplash hacked
by Gui, not the newly launched version which Amuza wanted to test.
Right?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:11 PM Luandro Viera <luandro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've been hacking at this, and finally got it
working and am now using it
here in my community as of today. I wrote a script
<https://github.com/luandro/libre-portal/blob/master/beta/install-voucher.sh>
to automate installing it here, but it might not work out-of-the-box for
you.It's good reference to get it working. There also a nice tool to
administrate the vouchers here
<https://github.com/coolabnet/VoucherAdmin-v2.0>.
The portal has worked so far for most devices, only an old Android device
didn't show any portal. My next step is to try and serve stuff from a
single-board-computer running a server thru the portal, in order to be able
to share large files.
Em dom, 19 de ago de 2018 às 20:39, amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> escreveu:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
Hi,
I tested it taking into account Bruno's guide for old Nodogsplash on LiMe
[0] and the new official documentation of new Nodogsplash [1] [2]. But
could not make it work, I could access http pages without being captured by
Nodogsplash.
Perhaps it is related to a note in the documentation [3] reading "*At
the time of writing, Nodogsplash has been tested with OpenWrt 18.06.0; it
may or may not work on older versions of OpenWrt or on other kinds of
Linux-based router firmware.*"
[0] http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
[1] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
[2]
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/blob/master/resources/nodogsplas…
[3] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html
On 17/08/18 16:12, bruno vianna wrote:
yes! let us know if it will work on lime
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:37 AM amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default what
I need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users also the problems people will face when using the
connection for apps
different than a browser.
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is smart
enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login page. Even
firefox on desktops will also detect that.
I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread:
capturing only port 80
traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified version
of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash
version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on
port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would never
end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by
creating VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the best
solution. I don't know if there is one.
In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see
things like:
FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port
80"?
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that
something like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the
nodogsplash hack.
Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
Have fun!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
> Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be a tester :-)
>
>
> 24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs"
<patricio(a)altermundi.net>
> escribió:
>
> > El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna <
> bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
>
> >
> >> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
> >> collaborate
> >> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will
> happen
> >> in
> >> less than 6 months or so.
> >
> > If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to
> create Pitbull, maybe we can
> > attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more people to
> participate, we will have a
> > clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this first draft?:
> >
> > *The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive portal
> software to enable community
> > functions such as local bulletin boards and network access control.
> We call on people with Lua
> > programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
> https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
> > questions and comments there. For more read communication, visit our
> matrix chat room at -insert
> > address here-. We also call on people interested in testing the
> captive portal software as we
> > develop it.*
> >
> > Improving this call to action and distributing it among our networks
> at least opens the chance of
> > other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
> >
> > (I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can contribute
> much in that task. Testing I
> > think I can do.)
> >
> > I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of
> value to our networks and make
> > them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives to
> non-community networks, offering tools
> > and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
> >
> >> I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and
> send
> >> it
> >> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
> >
> > Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since we
> started over a year ago. I
> > look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to libremesh 17).
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >> Bruno
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the
> question
> >>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well!
> Think
> >>
> >> of
> >>> this as a +1!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
> >> a
> >> welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
> >> guess
> >> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just clicked
> >> an
> >> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month. So
> >> they
> >> would have to go through this News page once a month.
> >>
> >> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try to
> >> make
> >> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
> >> think
> >> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
> >>
> >> What is the status of Pitbull?
> >>
> >> Would it work for the described need?
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lime-users mailing list
> >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lime-users mailing list
> >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> >>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico
▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
1:53 p.m.
Oh, I'm sorry, you're right Bruno. I'd also really like to know if and how
the new version works.
Em ter, 21 de ago de 2018 às 10:32, bruno vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com> escreveu:
But, just to clarify - Luandro used the old version of
Nodogsplash hacked
by Gui, not the newly launched version which Amuza wanted to test.
Right?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:11 PM Luandro Viera <luandro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've been hacking at this, and finally got
it working and am now using it
here in my community as of today. I wrote a script
<https://github.com/luandro/libre-portal/blob/master/beta/install-voucher.sh>
to automate installing it here, but it might not work out-of-the-box for
you.It's good reference to get it working. There also a nice tool to
administrate the vouchers here
<https://github.com/coolabnet/VoucherAdmin-v2.0>.
The portal has worked so far for most devices, only an old Android device
didn't show any portal. My next step is to try and serve stuff from a
single-board-computer running a server thru the portal, in order to be able
to share large files.
Em dom, 19 de ago de 2018 às 20:39, amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> escreveu:
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Hi,
I tested it taking into account Bruno's guide for old Nodogsplash on
LiMe [0] and the new official documentation of new Nodogsplash [1] [2]. But
could not make it work, I could access http pages without being captured by
Nodogsplash.
Perhaps it is related to a note in the documentation [3] reading "*At
the time of writing, Nodogsplash has been tested with OpenWrt 18.06.0; it
may or may not work on older versions of OpenWrt or on other kinds of
Linux-based router firmware.*"
[0]
http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
[1] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
[2]
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/blob/master/resources/nodogsplas…
[3] https://nodogsplash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html
On 17/08/18 16:12, bruno vianna wrote:
yes! let us know if it will work on lime
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:37 AM amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users Hi!
Nodogsplash 3.0.0 is out.
I have not tested it yet, but I will, as it seems to do by default what
I need.
https://github.com/nodogsplash/nodogsplash/releases/tag/v3.0.0
Cheers!
On 04/04/18 19:29, bruno vianna wrote:
Https requests give an error instead of the splash page, and there is
> also the problems people will face when using the connection for apps
> different than a browser.
>
>
Yes, it is annoying. But most of our users have android, which is smart
enough to detect the portal and redirect users to the login page. Even
firefox on desktops will also detect that.
> I like a solution Pau mentioned on that thread: capturing only port 80
> traffic and letting everything else flow. He mentioned a modified version
> of tinyproxy to do that. However I see (at least in the current Nodogsplash
> version) it seems possible to do it just by editing the configuration file.
>
>
There are a few issues there- first, most of the web traffic is now on
port https (443). So someone who just uses facebook (mercy!) would never
end up in the portal.
Besides, there are apps out there built to circunvent portals by
creating VPN connections on other ports. So I don't think this is the best
solution. I don't know if there is one.
> In the Nodogsplash configuration file I see things like:
>
> FirewallRule allow tcp port 53
>
> Do you know what I should write in order to "Allow everything but port
> 80"?
>
>
>
I don't know the correct syntax, but I think the way to do that
something like
FirewallRule block tcp all ports
FirewallRule allow tcp port 80
As the rules are followed in the order of the file.
Let us know how it works for you!
Best
Bruno
> In the meantime... here is the tutorial for the nodogsplash hack.
> Please test and let us now any problems, typos, etc.
>
> http://wiki.coolab.org/index.php?title=How_to_create_a_captive_portal
>
> Have fun!
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:38 PM, <modante(a)disroot.org> wrote:
>
>> Absolutely agree. I am not developer but could be a tester :-)
>>
>>
>> 24 de marzo de 2018 11:08, "Patricio Gibbs"
<patricio(a)altermundi.net>
>> escribió:
>>
>> > El 23 de marzo de 2018 7:42:17 GMT-05:00, bruno vianna <
>> bruno(a)pobox.com> escribió:
>>
>> >
>> >> Pitbull is not useful yet according to Nico Pace. We started to
>> >> collaborate
>> >> to develop to get it finished but it doesn't seem like it will
>> happen
>> >> in
>> >> less than 6 months or so.
>> >
>> > If we write a brief description of the skills and work needed to
>> create Pitbull, maybe we can
>> > attract more developers. And even if we don't attract more people
>> to participate, we will have a
>> > clearer understanding of the work. Who can improve this first
>> draft?:
>> >
>> > *The LibreMesh community will soon start working on a captive
>> portal software to enable community
>> > functions such as local bulletin boards and network access control.
>> We call on people with Lua
>> > programming experience to look at our GitHub repo at
>> https://GitHub.com/libremesh/pitbull and post
>> > questions and comments there. For more read communication, visit
>> our matrix chat room at -insert
>> > address here-. We also call on people interested in testing the
>> captive portal software as we
>> > develop it.*
>> >
>> > Improving this call to action and distributing it among our
>> networks at least opens the chance of
>> > other people joining the effort... Nothing to lose.
>> >
>> > (I'm willing to learn more programming, but I don't I can
>> contribute much in that task. Testing I
>> > think I can do.)
>> >
>> > I think these creations, such as the captive portal, add a lot of
>> value to our networks and make
>> > them more attractive and more viable as real alternatives to
>> non-community networks, offering tools
>> > and social dynamics that non-community networks cannot offer.
>> >
>> >> I'll work on an English documentation of the hack this weekend and
>> send
>> >> it
>> >> to the list, it would be great if you could test.
>> >
>> > Great! Our community in Caimito has wanted a captive portal since
>> we started over a year ago. I
>> > look forward to testing (and upgrading or nodes to libremesh 17).
>> >
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> >> Bruno
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Paul Harmor <psharmor(a)gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Not that I can provide any useful information to answer the
>> question
>> >>> posed, but I'd sure like to see this become a reality as well!
>> Think
>> >>
>> >> of
>> >>> this as a +1!
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 05:12 Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Here we are considering again the captive portal thing. It would be
>> >> a
>> >> welcome page with some community news, not real authentication. I
>> >> guess
>> >> we would like a system where MAC addresses of users who just
>> clicked
>> >> an
>> >> "Ok" button of the splash page would be validated for a month.
So
>> >> they
>> >> would have to go through this News page once a month.
>> >>
>> >> I've seen Nodogsplash seems to be maintained again, so I can try
to
>> >> make
>> >> it work for LiMe. But first I wanted to ask about Pitbull, as I
>> >> think
>> >> that was something similar but specially made for LiMe.
>> >>
>> >> What is the status of Pitbull?
>> >>
>> >> Would it work for the described need?
>> >>
>> >> Thank you!
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> lime-users mailing list
>> >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> lime-users mailing list
>> >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> >>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lime-users mailing list
>> > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-users mailing list
>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
> http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
> skype: randomico
> ▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
>
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄
http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄
skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing
listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
2078
days inactive
2229
days old
lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
14 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Amuza -
amuza
-
bruno vianna -
Luandro Viera -
modante＠disroot.org -
Patricio Gibbs -
Paul Harmor