Last weeks a group of us have been working on LibreMesh to deliver what will be the next release based on LEDE 17.01. For such purpose some of us have moved to a rural area of Argentina where exist a Community Network made of 70 nodes (approx). We are testing the new firmware here, finding and fixing problems which are only observable when there is real user data. So we expect this new release to be the most stable and reliable until now. Probably this week we will publish the first candidate but we are still missing something important... the name. Until now we were trying to follow the name rules used by OpenWRT (AA, BB, CC, ...), so what we had was: - BigBang - CommunityChaos Then this one should be named DD. But as OpenWRT is kind of abandoned and now we are using LEDE, maybe we should also change the name rules (¿maybe?). The LEDE release is named "Reboot". So names related with Reboot or starting with 'R' would be also an option. In any case we are open to any idea. Cheers. _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

we have a winner! On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote: -- bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄ http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄ skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌ _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

RoutingRevolution Am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Nk: _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

Hi Pau Nice idea. Are votes welcome from outside the ml [and outside my team of course ;] or members only? Thanks! Nk On 27 mar 2017, 23:15 +0200, Pau <pau(a)dabax.net>et>, wrote: _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 28/03/17 11:25, Pau wrote: Being right now midnight UTC+1, i attach a snapshot of the current results so we have a clear winner, Dayboot Rely! congratulations to everyone cheers! > Cheers. > > On 28/03/17 10:00, Nk wrote: >> Hi Pau >> >> Nice idea. Are votes welcome from outside the ml [and outside my team of course ;] or members only? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Nk >> >> On 27 mar 2017, 23:15 +0200, Pau <pau(a)dabax.net>et>, wrote: >>> I've created a poll on framadate to vote for the name. >>> >>> https://framadate.org/ZnBehwGF8COhHmCz >>> >>> Let's put Wednesday 29th 00:00 UTC as deadline for voting. >>> New names only accepted until 28th 12:00 UTC. >>> >>> My proposal is maximum two votes per person. >>> >>> Please use a name which can be recognized as participant of this mailing >>> list or the IRC freenode channel. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> On 27/03/17 16:22, Paul Spooren wrote: >>>> RoutingRevolution >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Nk: >>>>> Hi all! Awesome news! >>>>> >>>>> All of our team has been on a brainstorming loop over this topic this >>>>> morning as soon as we read the mail and these are the ideas that have >>>>> been tossed around ;] >>>>> >>>>> With a *D*: >>>>> >>>>> *Distributed Dawning* [or *Decentralized* as @Amusa suggested] ** >>>>> *Disruptive Development* >>>>> *Dynamic Diversity* >>>>> >>>>> [*Distributed* as the most extreme level as *decentralization*, also a >>>>> very cool term as @Amusa pointed out] >>>>> [I love this definition of *Dawning*: To begin to appear or develop; >>>>> emerge.] >>>>> [*Diversity*: Using multiple antennae to reduce interference and >>>>> improve both transmission and reception of signals.] >>>>> >>>>> With an *R*: >>>>> >>>>> *Recursive Resonance* >>>>> *Redundant Rebirth* >>>>> *Resonant Reboot* >>>>> * >>>>> * >>>>> [*Resonance*: Mechanical resonance is the tendency of a mechanical >>>>> system to respond at greater amplitude when the frequency of its >>>>> oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its >>>>> resonance frequency or resonant frequency) than it does at other >>>>> frequencies.] >>>>> >>>>> Some are rather self-ironically nerdy of course, but isn’t that the >>>>> point? ;] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 27 mar 2017, 15:18 +0200, bruno vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com>om>, wrote: >>>>>> we have a winner! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>>>>>> DecentralizedDeity >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/03/17 18:05, Pau wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Last weeks a group of us have been working on LibreMesh to deliver what >>>>>>> will be the next release based on LEDE 17.01. For such purpose some of >>>>>>> us have moved to a rural area of Argentina where exist a Community >>>>>>> Network made of 70 nodes (approx). We are testing the new firmware >>>>>>> here, >>>>>>> finding and fixing problems which are only observable when there is >>>>>>> real >>>>>>> user data. So we expect this new release to be the most stable and >>>>>>> reliable until now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably this week we will publish the first candidate but we are still >>>>>>> missing something important... the name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Until now we were trying to follow the name rules used by OpenWRT (AA, >>>>>>> BB, CC, ...), so what we had was: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - BigBang >>>>>>> - CommunityChaos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then this one should be named DD. But as OpenWRT is kind of abandoned >>>>>>> and now we are using LEDE, maybe we should also change the name rules >>>>>>> (¿maybe?). The LEDE release is named "Reboot". So names related with >>>>>>> Reboot or starting with 'R' would be also an option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In any case we are open to any idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄ >>>>>> http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄ >>>>>> skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lime-users mailing list >>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>> >>> -- >>> ./p4u >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lime-users mailing list >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-users mailing list >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > lime-users mailing list > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > lime-users mailing list > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 03/28/2017 08:09 PM, Pau wrote: I believe there's no problem voting again. I propose we have a bit more time to vote this time around.

Cheers!!! Nico _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 29/03/17 01:33, Nicolás Echániz wrote: I don't really know how to understand the "yellow" votes. If we count them as "yes" the two winners are "Disruptive Development" and "Routing Revolution" :/ So it is definitely a disruptive poll... Maybe voting again with the three "winners" would be the best.