also, the v2 is a qualcomm radio (new atheros, not so well supported), so if you want to try this new devices, i would stick with v1. Has anyone tried these?

I did. I've built an image with the cooker. Adhoc mode didn't work in the 2.4Ghz radio. But Mesh mode works well in both.  With Libremesh going standard for mesh mode in version 17, does this mean we won't be able to mix equipments that have version 16.05 with equipments with version 17? (unless they're connected by ethernet?)

wrote:

On 07/09/2017 11:06 AM, bruno vianna wrote: supported), You will be able to select adhoc operation, but 11s will be the default setting. If a portion of the network is working in adhoc and another portion in 11s, then you'd need to connect those "clouds" through ethernet. _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 07/09/2017 09:06 AM, bruno vianna wrote: I don't know the difference between adhoc and 802.11s, and while I could learn, my main interest is: Will this impact how we design, create, use, and maintain our network in Caimito, and if so, how? ~ P _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

Hello! What is your opinion about Tp-link Archer C60? Is there any experience with LiMe? Has more transmit power than the C50? Thank you El 09/07/2017 a las 10:56, Nicolas Pace escribió: On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 10:52 -0300, bruno vianna wrote: So, are these dual band? The two good sources of information about this are the openwrt wiki and wikidevi. What we can get from there is that there are two versions:https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_Archer_C50_v1.xhttps://wikidevi.… only one supported for now in openwrt:https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/archer-c50 also, the v2 is a qualcomm radio (new atheros, not so well supported), so if you want to try this new devices, i would stick with v1. Has anyone tried these? On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:10 AM, bruno vianna &lt;bruno(a)pobox.com&gt; &lt;bruno(a)pobox.com&gt; wrote: Big antennas, small elements! Em 1 de jul de 2017 9:10 PM, "Nicolás Echániz" <nicoechaniz@altermu ndi.net> &lt;nicoechaniz(a)altermundi.net&gt; escreveu: thanks foe the pics if you can send an image of the antenna internals, we can see if it is a known dual band model. I'm thinking we can use ufl pigtails, like these : https://www.data-alliance.net/u-fl-extension-cable-18-inch-20-in-22 -in-2ft-28-in-30-in-3ft-42-inch-u-fl-male-to-u-fl-female/ ... to be able to use these antennas the way we use those provided with the 3500/3600 models. On July 1, 2017 7:11:42 PM GMT-03:00, bruno vianna &lt;bruno(a)pobox.com wrote: Bruno, can you send pictures of this router without it's cover? I'd like to see how the antennas are connected to the board. Also, do you know if the antennas are bi-band or the 2.4Ghz antenna is inside the router like in other models? Here they are. It looks like both antennas are connected to both chips (there is a track in the other side of the board connecting the antenna on the left to the MT7620 chip). Is there anyway I can test this? _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing listlime-users@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users ------------------------------ [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users