We try to incroporate Lime into network which is CC only (for techn.reasons)
So thank you very much for your efford.
Will test ist ASAP with new test-builds on BR15L and gathering some more
Keep up the good work !
3zl / Reinhard
DISCLAIMER: This mail contain sarcasm! Please don't take it as a personal
insult but as an occasion to make fun of our own code and learn ;)
This morning I was reviewing the branch that claimed to fix incompatibilities
with Chaos Calmer, I even re-based it on top of current develop and gave it a
name that fits more in our branch naming convention...
After some testing and reading I decided to not merge it and to rewrite it
from scratch instead.
Some shitty part of our code that was network.generate_host instead of using
the IP API was messing a lot with CIDR private internals, as Lua is so
indulgent it didn't refused to run but our code was a real mess!
In the new version of the library that part has been rewritten in C and to Lua
it exposed just the API so our shitty code can't mess with the private stuff
anymore, in this situation our reaction instead of fixing our shitty code has
been to copy the old luci code before putting it inside our core and then
(more reasonably) as a separate package...
This morning I have decided to do what we should have done since the
rewrite the shit code so we don't need the old library anymore, in this
process I even discovered a Luci bug that Jow has already fixed (a missing
I was tempted to delete the wrong branch but i decided that is a good idea to
keep it some week more so we all have time to review and understand what we
have done wrong
And here it goes the branch with the proper solution
I have already tested it if no one oppose this I'll merge it in the following
I was reviewing our repo and found out lot of personal branch out of the
naming scheme we consensuated got inside our main repo.
I believe this happened by accidental error because all members of our github
organization has admin right on all repositories, i am changing this so there
is no possibility of pushing accidentally unwanted stuff and a pull request
have to be done
Some times ago I reported an issue on Github asking to "Separate
settings for netmask and IP range auto assignment" [#18].
Then I implemented a simple solution [#22] adding an _optional_ field to
the main_ipv4_address option.
G10 suggests to slightly modify my implementation, no problem.
But could we discuss if there's a better solution or if mine is ok?
I noticed that some emails didn't get delivered, I don't have them
neither in spam folder but they are in the archive.
For example: of the last four mail of september sent by
trizonelabs(a)gmail.com I have just one in my inbox.
It's just me or we have a faulty spam filter or some sending problems?