22 Jul
2019
22 Jul
'19
6:06 a.m.
David
I have been using a mix of LibreRouter config and what was the old notes,
and actually was not including lime-proto-anygw
I was including dnsmasq-lease-share.
I will now check with your response from SAn about using
shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead and what effect it has
What might be usefull is to understand about how these packages actually
work or at lease what files it generates
Other OLSR based resources you can look at if you are interested
https://github.com/aredn/aredn_ar71xx
https://www.metamesh.org/multi-port-routers
https://www.metamesh.org/single-port-routers
Regards
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:39 AM David Medland-Slater <
david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Very much appreciated! I'll give that a go....
On 21/07/19 8:31 pm, SAn wrote:
Hi David!
I think the problem is that the documentation is not in sync with the
last
developments we have been doing moving away from alfred to maintain
shared state and using a new development called shared-state do do it. So
now lime-proto-anygw depends on shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead of
dnsmasq-lease-share. Sorry about this! We will fix the docs.
Here you can find the config that we are using for the LibreRouter
firmware:
https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de…
. We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development.
Best!
SAn
On 7/21/19 2:28 AM, David Medland-Slater wrote:
> Well at least I'm not going mad then! Could I perhaps ask for some
> general advice Mark on building a more up to date libremesh. I'm
> running the released version but on another project I've found plain
> vanilla openwrt 18 is considerably better than 17. Is there a sensible
> path to get a libremesh 18? This is for a home lab, nothing fancy
> running only 3 nodes, so it doesn't need to be production quality. I
> had hoped the development.html web page would be enough to give me
> working build options, but as you have seen, I'm not making much
progress.
>
> With v17, I make use of the distributed DHCP, although I could live
> without that if it was problematic.
>
> Thanks in advance ...
>
> On 21/07/19 8:49 am, Mark Birss wrote:
>> yes, lime-proto-anygw disappear when selecting dnsmasq-lease-share.
>>
>> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv gw mode
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater
>> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com
<mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me then, at the
point
of
>> running menuconfig,
lime-proto-anygw is visible. Enable
>> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the docs both
need
>> to be
>> selected, I appear to be stuck.
>>
>> Do you get the same effect; selecting dnsmasq-lease-share makes
>> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it has been
deselected?
>>
>>
>> On 21/07/19 6:58 am, Mark Birss wrote:
>> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq=n" >> .config
>> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq-dhcpv6=y" >> .config
>> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=n" >> .config
>> > make defconfig
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-dev mailing list
>> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:
lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org>
>>
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lime-dev mailing list
>> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org
>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev
> _______________________________________________
> lime-dev mailing list
> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org
> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev
>
_______________________________________________
lime-dev mailing list
lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev