On 05/29/2013 02:31 PM, Pau wrote:
Interesting.
Let's fork it, adapt it to LiMe and test it. I have been looking in the
repository and seems quite easy.
For QMP we modified tinyproxy [1] (to support splash) and added a
tinymce package [2] (for modifying the splash screen).
We can test both and see which one performs better. For me the best
points of nodogsplash are:
1. It is better integrated in OpenWRT
2. It permits limit bandwidth per user
bandwidth control is not working in current OpenWRT, but it is in the
roadmap, maybe we could even help the current maintainers with this.
Saverio is very involved in nodogsplash.