2016-10-13 2:39 GMT+02:00 Ufo <ufo(a)rund.freifunk.net>et>:
Am 12.10.16 um 18:40 schrieb Ilario:
2016-10-05 20:06 GMT+02:00 Ilario
<iochesonome(a)gmail.com>om>:
If 192.168.1.1 is a bad default in your opinion (I guess...?)
yes
Ok :)
An
user-friendly and easy to document IP would be anygw 10.0.0.1 and
..
Would be a bad default to have a /8 routing mask?
yes, would be bad to have /8.
a normal libremesh-mesh should be in one /16, thats needed to seperate
it to other 10.y/16 netzworks
Ok.
Is it a too ugly workaround to catch all packets to 10.0.0.1 via the firewall?
Is there a clean way to have an unique local management IPv4 for LiMe?
it would be better to set nice dns hostnames! it
should be easy to
program because every libremsh node has dns-server
We already have one!
thisnode.info
It has been added some time ago [1] and documented [2].
somewhere in the firmware there is still a /8 route,
but i think thats a
mistake and of course another thread!?
root@LiMe-41cc18:/etc/config# bmx6 -cd8 | grep /8
clouds 10.0.0.0/8 8 128 20 100 960 bmxOut_LiMe-e6
10.13.0.0/16 LiMe-e6386e 10.13.0.0/16 128G 51700
62668
Ehm no idea...
Bye!
Ilario
[1]
https://github.com/libremesh/lime-packages/commit/8bcf0f2f060c16c765e8a24b2…
[2]
http://libremesh.org/docs/connecting_nodes.html