21 Jul
2016
21 Jul
'16
2:45 p.m.
2016-07-13 15:39 GMT+02:00 p4u <pau(a)dabax.net>et>:
Good point is that now we have many more targets
(routers) available.
I've even tested different architectures such as x86 (which works fine)
and RAMIPS (which does not work fine in Ad-Hoc but it does in 802.11s
mode).
So, from my understanding there are architectures where trying to set both
ad-hoc and ap modes is not going to work, or it would be better to set
802.11s and ap instead (as Pau told for ramips), right?
In my opinion (ap + ad-hoc | just ap | ap + 802.11s) selection could be
made by lime-build depending of the selected target architecture.
lime-build could do this setting different lime-defaults depending on the
target (not implemented yet).
Otherwise I suspect that we should move some files [1] from lime-system to
new packages lime-mode-adhoc and lime-mode-ieee80211s (and stop using
lime-full), then specifying the wanted packages in the targets files [2].
Byyye,
Ilario
[1] at least these
https://github.com/libre-mesh/lime-packages/tree/develop/packages/lime-syst…
[2] https://github.com/libre-mesh/lime-build/tree/develop/targets