-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thank Gio for taking care of that!
Are you planning to prepare a patch? I don't know if I can help, but
is so, tell me.
Cheers
On 17/11/13 13:39, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
The resume is he have no time to do it now, but if we
send to him
patches for netifd he will merge them.
He suggest start working on latest netifd used by openwrt trunk
<G10h4ck> Hi! <nbd> hi <G10h4ck> I am gioacchino from libre-mesh
<G10h4ck> before anything <G10h4ck> many thanks for implementing
mac-vlan in uci <G10h4ck> now we need something very similar for
802.1ad vlan <G10h4ck> this would help us and more people affected
by tplink shitty bridges <G10h4ck> because we have tested and
802.1ad vlan packets are not dropped by the switch, while it drop
802.1q <G10h4ck> in this page also it is reported something
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/networking/network.interfaces <nbd>
right, this would need to be implemented in netifd <nbd> the code
has to be changed to use netlink instead of ioctl to configure vlan
devices <G10h4ck> i imagining something very similar to what you
done with mac-vlan, am i wrong ? <nbd> it's a bit similar <nbd> but
involves more rework of the existing code <G10h4ck> are you
planning to do this soon ? <nbd> i don't have time to work on this
at the moment <G10h4ck> ok <G10h4ck> how is going work with ath9k
? <G10h4ck> i remember at last WCW you talked to me about a feature
that would increase speed, and cannot be easly implemented by
proprietary driver because they work a lot at firware level
<G10h4ck> while a good amount of memory was needed to implement
that ( i remember the precondition but not the feature :P ) <nbd>
it's mostly a latency improvement <nbd> still working on it, but
much of the infrastructure for it is done <G10h4ck> many thanks :D
<nbd> you're welcome <G10h4ck> nbd if we do a patch for netifd,
there is to have the patch integrated soon ? <G10h4ck> because some
time some patch need eons to be integrated :P <G10h4ck> and from
what branch do you suggest to start working on this ? <nbd> if you
send a patch against netifd, i will review it and merge it when
it's okay <G10h4ck> ok <nbd> you should work on it with the latest
git version of netifd <nbd> used in openwrt trunk <nbd> brb
<G10h4ck> thanks, see you soon!
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list
Dev(a)lists.libre-mesh.org
https://lists.libre-mesh.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
- --
./p4u
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSkSV/AAoJEAX7rWpc+YnNBecIAJMw8y2PRBRcJ7wUeH7+XoWV
wNjMqEDRlsfSSpV2oxn0Gh0ufme9gjhhQe40WmEdK4Clgag36u02IHIfFVMWMQVc
K+VeAgDJF8q7XJJZ6HEvHXCpmNCkGfYqSAWtMK3taj8tOshnvYScXIRO8caHnNVj
ovTaQsGGJZD4emQL+A6nZrg7pRRETFD3+vDWs1MhekdAQPFnQLlK/t2vjqG+2EYm
LqpCTDcr8WVpL+tyf6VGPOw6FDXJInguZjB8LqeEMlUp2q5RyMOPL4ADsAfdQNFJ
Uawf4re0e/batvMCkTCJ1n0euDNQ/p0JD3NsFMioEX0t9JWDHuYSnw8Hi8CkF4M=
=Iabc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----