Re: [lime-dev] Cannot find LiMe → lime-proto-anygw building from source

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

Workflow for developing LibreMesh...

Cannot find LiMe →...

David Medland-Slater

21 Jul 2019 21 Jul '19

8:39 a.m.

Very much appreciated! I'll give that a go.... On 21/07/19 8:31 pm, SAn wrote:

...

Hi David! I think the problem is that the documentation is not in sync with the last developments we have been doing moving away from alfred to maintain shared state and using a new development called shared-state do do it. So now lime-proto-anygw depends on shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead of dnsmasq-lease-share. Sorry about this! We will fix the docs. Here you can find the config that we are using for the LibreRouter firmware: https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de… . We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development. Best! SAn On 7/21/19 2:28 AM, David Medland-Slater wrote: > Well at least I'm not going mad then! Could I perhaps ask for some > general advice Mark on building a more up to date libremesh. I'm > running the released version but on another project I've found plain > vanilla openwrt 18 is considerably better than 17. Is there a sensible > path to get a libremesh 18? This is for a home lab, nothing fancy > running only 3 nodes, so it doesn't need to be production quality. I > had hoped the development.html web page would be enough to give me > working build options, but as you have seen, I'm not making much progress. > > With v17, I make use of the distributed DHCP, although I could live > without that if it was problematic. > > Thanks in advance ... > > On 21/07/19 8:49 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> yes, lime-proto-anygw disappear when selecting dnsmasq-lease-share. >> >> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv gw mode >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater >> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me then, at the point of >> running menuconfig, lime-proto-anygw is visible. Enable >> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the docs both need >> to be >> selected, I appear to be stuck. >> >> Do you get the same effect; selecting dnsmasq-lease-share makes >> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it has been deselected? >> >> >> On 21/07/19 6:58 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq=n" >> .config >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq-dhcpv6=y" >> .config >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=n" >> .config >> > make defconfig >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev > _______________________________________________ > lime-dev mailing list > lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >

Show replies by date

Mark Birss

22 Jul 22 Jul

6:06 a.m.

New subject: [lime-dev] Cannot find LiMe → lime-proto-anygw building from source

David I have been using a mix of LibreRouter config and what was the old notes, and actually was not including lime-proto-anygw I was including dnsmasq-lease-share. I will now check with your response from SAn about using shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead and what effect it has What might be usefull is to understand about how these packages actually work or at lease what files it generates Other OLSR based resources you can look at if you are interested https://github.com/aredn/aredn_ar71xx https://www.metamesh.org/multi-port-routers https://www.metamesh.org/single-port-routers Regards On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:39 AM David Medland-Slater < david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Very much appreciated! I'll give that a go.... On 21/07/19 8:31 pm, SAn wrote:

Hi David! I think the problem is that the documentation is not in sync with the

last developments we have been doing moving away from alfred to maintain shared state and using a new development called shared-state do do it. So now lime-proto-anygw depends on shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead of dnsmasq-lease-share. Sorry about this! We will fix the docs.

Here you can find the config that we are using for the LibreRouter

firmware: https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de… . We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development.

Best! SAn On 7/21/19 2:28 AM, David Medland-Slater wrote: > Well at least I'm not going mad then! Could I perhaps ask for some > general advice Mark on building a more up to date libremesh. I'm > running the released version but on another project I've found plain > vanilla openwrt 18 is considerably better than 17. Is there a sensible > path to get a libremesh 18? This is for a home lab, nothing fancy > running only 3 nodes, so it doesn't need to be production quality. I > had hoped the development.html web page would be enough to give me > working build options, but as you have seen, I'm not making much

progress.

> > With v17, I make use of the distributed DHCP, although I could live > without that if it was problematic. > > Thanks in advance ... > > On 21/07/19 8:49 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> yes, lime-proto-anygw disappear when selecting dnsmasq-lease-share. >> >> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv gw mode >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater >> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me then, at the

point of

>> running menuconfig, lime-proto-anygw is visible. Enable >> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the docs both

need

>> to be >> selected, I appear to be stuck. >> >> Do you get the same effect; selecting dnsmasq-lease-share makes >> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it has been

deselected?

>> >> >> On 21/07/19 6:58 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq=n" >> .config >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_dnsmasq-dhcpv6=y" >> .config >> > echo "CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=n" >> .config >> > make defconfig >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:

lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org>

>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev > _______________________________________________ > lime-dev mailing list > lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >

_______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev

David Medland-Slater

6:41 a.m.

New subject: Cannot find LiMe → lime-proto-anygw building from source

Very, very useful information Mark and thanks very much for those, especially the metamesh info On 22/07/19 6:06 pm, Mark Birss wrote:

...

Hi David! I think the problem is that the documentation is not in sync

with the last developments we have been doing moving away from alfred to maintain shared state and using a new development called shared-state do do it. So now lime-proto-anygw depends on shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead of dnsmasq-lease-share. Sorry about this! We will fix the docs.

Here you can find the config that we are using for the

LibreRouter firmware: https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de… . We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development.

plain

> vanilla openwrt 18 is considerably better than 17. Is there a

sensible

> path to get a libremesh 18? This is for a home lab, nothing fancy > running only 3 nodes, so it doesn't need to be production

quality. I

> had hoped the development.html web page would be enough to give me > working build options, but as you have seen, I'm not making

much progress.

selecting dnsmasq-lease-share.

>> >> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv gw mode >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater >> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com

<mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com> <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com>>>

>> wrote: >> >> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me then, at

the point of

>> running menuconfig, lime-proto-anygw is visible. Enable >> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the docs

both need

>> to be >> selected, I appear to be stuck. >> >> Do you get the same effect; selecting

dnsmasq-lease-share makes

>> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it has

been deselected?

<mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org>>

>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev > _______________________________________________ > lime-dev mailing list > lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >

_______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev _______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev

Mark Birss

29 Jul 29 Jul

5:37 a.m.

New subject: [lime-dev] Cannot find LiMe → lime-proto-anygw building from source

David I noticed a while back that I lost the ability to access my connected wifi ap with 10.13.0.1, but used dnsmasq-lease-share and my arp cache to find my connected noted and the other by viewing /tmp/dhcp.x.remote but this was actually lime-proto-anygw that was missing because i was including dnsmasq-lease-share but all still was fine since mesh nodes could still access the internet via the 1 mesh node that had internet access I have now removed dnsmasq-lease-share and included shared-state-dnsmasq_leases that has brought back lime-proto-anygw that allows local connected mesh ap access via 10.13.0.1 Hope that helps you also Regards On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:41 AM David Medland-Slater < david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Very, very useful information Mark and thanks very much for those, especially the metamesh info On 22/07/19 6:06 pm, Mark Birss wrote: David I have been using a mix of LibreRouter config and what was the old notes, and actually was not including lime-proto-anygw I was including dnsmasq-lease-share. I will now check with your response from SAn about using shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead and what effect it has What might be usefull is to understand about how these packages actually work or at lease what files it generates Other OLSR based resources you can look at if you are interested https://github.com/aredn/aredn_ar71xx https://www.metamesh.org/multi-port-routers https://www.metamesh.org/single-port-routers Regards On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:39 AM David Medland-Slater < david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Very much appreciated! I'll give that a go.... On 21/07/19 8:31 pm, SAn wrote:

Hi David! I think the problem is that the documentation is not in sync with the

Here you can find the config that we are using for the LibreRouter

firmware: https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de… . We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development.

progress.

> > With v17, I make use of the distributed DHCP, although I could live > without that if it was problematic. > > Thanks in advance ... > > On 21/07/19 8:49 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> yes, lime-proto-anygw disappear when selecting dnsmasq-lease-share. >> >> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv gw mode >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater >> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com > >> wrote: >> >> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me then, at the

point of

>> running menuconfig, lime-proto-anygw is visible. Enable >> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the docs both

need

>> to be >> selected, I appear to be stuck. >> >> Do you get the same effect; selecting dnsmasq-lease-share makes >> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it has been

deselected?

lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org>

_______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev

_______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing listlime-dev@lists.libremesh.orghttps://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev _______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev

David Medland-Slater

30 Jul 30 Jul

12:54 a.m.

New subject: Cannot find LiMe → lime-proto-anygw building from source

Thanks Mark. On 29/07/19 5:37 pm, Mark Birss wrote:

...

Hi David! I think the problem is that the documentation is not in

sync with the last developments we have been doing moving away from alfred to maintain shared state and using a new development called shared-state do do it. So now lime-proto-anygw depends on shared-state-dnsmasq_leases instead of dnsmasq-lease-share. Sorry about this! We will fix the docs.

Here you can find the config that we are using for the

LibreRouter firmware: https://github.com/LibreRouterOrg/openwrt/blob/librerouter-18.06/configs/de… . We have been keeping this config in sync with libremesh-development.

Best! SAn On 7/21/19 2:28 AM, David Medland-Slater wrote: > Well at least I'm not going mad then! Could I perhaps ask

for some

> general advice Mark on building a more up to date

libremesh. I'm

> running the released version but on another project I've

found plain

> vanilla openwrt 18 is considerably better than 17. Is

there a sensible

> path to get a libremesh 18? This is for a home lab,

nothing fancy

> running only 3 nodes, so it doesn't need to be production

quality. I

> had hoped the development.html web page would be enough to

give me

> working build options, but as you have seen, I'm not

making much progress.

> > With v17, I make use of the distributed DHCP, although I

could live

> without that if it was problematic. > > Thanks in advance ... > > On 21/07/19 8:49 am, Mark Birss wrote: >> yes, lime-proto-anygw disappear when

selecting dnsmasq-lease-share.

>> >> but seems i dont use it for my builds. I use BATMAN-adv

gw mode

>> >> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM David Medland-Slater >> <david.medlandslater(a)gmail.com

<mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com> <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com <mailto:david.medlandslater@gmail.com>>>

>> wrote: >> >> Yes that gives me the same result Mark. For me

then, at the point of

>> running menuconfig, lime-proto-anygw is visible.

Enable

>> dnsmasq-lease-share and it disappears. As from the

docs both need

>> to be >> selected, I appear to be stuck. >> >> Do you get the same effect; selecting

dnsmasq-lease-share makes

>> lime-proto-anygw disappear and if you search, it

has been deselected?

<mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org>>

>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-dev mailing list >> lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org

<mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org>

>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev > _______________________________________________ > lime-dev mailing list > lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org

<mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org>

> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev >

_______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev _______________________________________________ lime-dev mailing list lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org <mailto:lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev

1971

days inactive

1980

days old

lime-dev@lists.libremesh.org

Manage subscription

4 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

David Medland-Slater
Mark Birss