3 May
2016
3 May
'16
11:20 p.m.
On a TL-WDR3600 I was looking at the differences between the
/etc/config/network file in the last stable release and the develop
branch (great work going on there in these days!!).
Here are some lines which I want to bring to your attention (they could
be ok, but look suspicious to me):
config interface 'wan6'
option proto 'dhcpv6'
which becomes:
config interface 'wan6'
option proto 'none'
config device 'lm_anygw_dev'
which becomes:
config device 'lm_net__lan_anygw_dev'
(yes, with two joined underscores)
config device 'lm_wlan0_adhoc_batadv_dev'
option name 'wlan0-adhoc_203'
which becomes:
config device 'lm_net_wlan0_adhoc_batadv_dev'
option name '-lm-net-wlan0-adhoc_118'
this strange name (starting with a dash) repeats along the file
Then some more random observations :D
batctl if
prints just
eth0-2_118: active
while I expected to see also the wireless interfaces here
# ps |grep bmx
3509 root 1168 S grep bmx
so no bmx daemon is running?
sniffing on the ethernet ports of the router I can see batman packets
coming out just on the WAN port and not on the LAN ports.
I compiled the image using the new recommended system: lime-build
then I noticed that some of the packets that was suggested to deselect
by the old traditional compilation guide are indeed selected here:
CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_firewall=y
Keep up with the good work :D
Ilario
--
Ilario Gelmetti
iochesonome(a)gmail.com
igelmetti(a)iciq.es
ilario.gelmetti(a)estudiants.urv.cat
3 May
3 May
11:48 p.m.
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 01:20:02 Ilario Gelmetti wrote:
On a TL-WDR3600 I was looking at the differences
between the
/etc/config/network file in the last stable release and the develop
branch (great work going on there in these days!!).
Here are some lines which I want to bring to your attention (they could
be ok, but look suspicious to me):
config interface 'wan6'
option proto 'dhcpv6'
which becomes:
config interface 'wan6'
option proto 'none'
This is ok usually you donßt get a working ipv6 from normal ISP...
But leonard has a proposal about this maybe he will write soon
config device 'lm_anygw_dev'
which becomes:
config device 'lm_net__lan_anygw_dev'
(yes, with two joined underscores)
i understand it may seems strange but it doesn't cause any problem
config device 'lm_wlan0_adhoc_batadv_dev'
option name 'wlan0-adhoc_203'
which becomes:
config device 'lm_net_wlan0_adhoc_batadv_dev'
option name '-lm-net-wlan0-adhoc_118'
this strange name (starting with a dash) repeats along the file
Then some more random observations :D
batctl if
prints just
eth0-2_118: active
while I expected to see also the wireless interfaces here
This was a bug should be already fixed in latest commit
# ps |grep bmx
3509 root 1168 S grep bmx
so no bmx daemon is running?
Strange, can you reproduce with latest commit?
Which lime-build commands are you using to compile your image?
sniffing on the ethernet ports of the router I can see
batman packets
coming out just on the WAN port and not on the LAN ports.
more investigation needed
I compiled the image using the new recommended system:
lime-build
then I noticed that some of the packets that was suggested to deselect
by the old traditional compilation guide are indeed selected here:
CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_firewall=y
more investigation needed
Keep up with the good work :D
Ilario
Cheers and thanks for feedback!
Gio
4 May
4 May
9:17 a.m.
2016-05-04 1:48 GMT+02:00 Gio <gio(a)diveni.re>re>:
Ah, I forgot to specify that the dhcp client was working just on the
WAN port, so the WAN port was correctly identified by
lime-hwd-openwrt-wan
Please take advantage of being all the devs in the same place for
discussing this, once decided to keep or not these packages the
problem is super easy to solve adding a line here I think:
https://github.com/libre-mesh/lime-build/blob/develop/configs/ath-lime-basic
Thank you :D
Ilario
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 01:20:02 Ilario Gelmetti
wrote:
I compiled yesterday night using:
cd lime-build
git checkout develop
git pull
make T=tl-wdr3600 LIME_GIT_BRANCH=sandbox/vlanzero UPDATE=1 build
so I had all the commits that are present now in the develop branch,
nothing was missing, below here you can see the commits I had.
Anyway I'm going to test it again tonight compiling from develop branch.
cd lime-build/build/lime-packages ; git log
commit 4d7804dea23aea60377eb8686a1290573e98796d
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 23:31:37 2016 +0200
lime-proto-olsr6: respect specific interface and permit olsr
interfaces IP overriding
commit a22c05c4fff44e3f1ae06ed485e772c5f6debea8
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 19:27:53 2016 +0200
fixup! network.createVlanIface return a dummy but valid non
vlan interface if vid is 0
commit 06a1b33f4d835716d92a271db06da8fe84916042
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 18:20:19 2016 +0200
lime-proto-olsr: respect specific interface and permit olsr
interfaces IP overriding
commit f890a529b0733ea3873f6b6d2d1767a28e6abbb9
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 18:18:13 2016 +0200
network.createVlanIface return a dummy but valid non vlan
interface if vid is 0
commit bef8a5bc9aee2eb3b5df58ede6f765ffa76550b3
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Tue May 3 02:04:42 2016 +0200
network.clean now delete also rules and routes created by lime
commit 392b883f573df8cc163b283c21f3458070dd5c9a
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Thu Apr 28 11:10:48 2016 +0200
Put specific flag in the right place (solves bug discovered
during LimeCat)
commit 3773af71e55058dbde8894648c21e9bb2273a778
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Wed Mar 9 23:05:43 2016 +0100
remove repository customizer for develop branch
commit 01c6ef9ba9f1b557a11ad184b2385b9f6ac27500
Merge: 6324dc3 9e4e0bb
Author: Gioacchino <gmazzurco89(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed Mar 9 22:55:22 2016 +0100
Merge pull request #40 from ilario/sandbox/conditional-dependency
Change to conditional dependencies for lime-proto-x
batctl if
prints just
eth0-2_118: active
while I expected to see also the wireless interfaces here
This was a bug should be already fixed in latest commit
# ps |grep bmx
3509 root 1168 S grep bmx
so no bmx daemon is running?
Strange, can you reproduce with latest commit?
Which lime-build commands are you using to compile your image? sniffing on
the ethernet ports of the router I can see batman packets
coming out just on the WAN port and not on the LAN ports.
more investigation needed I compiled the
image using the new recommended system: lime-build
then I noticed that some of the packets that was suggested to deselect
by the old traditional compilation guide are indeed selected here:
CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_firewall=y
more investigation needed Keep up with
the good work :D
Ilario
Cheers and thanks for feedback!
10:15 p.m.
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 11:17:35 Ilario wrote:
2016-05-04 1:48 GMT+02:00 Gio <gio(a)diveni.re>re>:
Please try again with last changes
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 01:20:02 Ilario Gelmetti
wrote:
I compiled yesterday night using:
cd lime-build
git checkout develop
git pull
make T=tl-wdr3600 LIME_GIT_BRANCH=sandbox/vlanzero UPDATE=1 build
so I had all the commits that are present now in the develop branch,
nothing was missing, below here you can see the commits I had.
Anyway I'm going to test it again tonight compiling from develop branch.
cd lime-build/build/lime-packages ; git log
commit 4d7804dea23aea60377eb8686a1290573e98796d
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 23:31:37 2016 +0200
lime-proto-olsr6: respect specific interface and permit olsr
interfaces IP overriding
commit a22c05c4fff44e3f1ae06ed485e772c5f6debea8
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 19:27:53 2016 +0200
fixup! network.createVlanIface return a dummy but valid non
vlan interface if vid is 0
commit 06a1b33f4d835716d92a271db06da8fe84916042
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 18:20:19 2016 +0200
lime-proto-olsr: respect specific interface and permit olsr
interfaces IP overriding
commit f890a529b0733ea3873f6b6d2d1767a28e6abbb9
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Mon May 2 18:18:13 2016 +0200
network.createVlanIface return a dummy but valid non vlan
interface if vid is 0
commit bef8a5bc9aee2eb3b5df58ede6f765ffa76550b3
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Tue May 3 02:04:42 2016 +0200
network.clean now delete also rules and routes created by lime
commit 392b883f573df8cc163b283c21f3458070dd5c9a
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Thu Apr 28 11:10:48 2016 +0200
Put specific flag in the right place (solves bug discovered
during LimeCat)
commit 3773af71e55058dbde8894648c21e9bb2273a778
Author: Gio <gio(a)eigenlab.org>
Date: Wed Mar 9 23:05:43 2016 +0100
remove repository customizer for develop branch
commit 01c6ef9ba9f1b557a11ad184b2385b9f6ac27500
Merge: 6324dc3 9e4e0bb
Author: Gioacchino <gmazzurco89(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed Mar 9 22:55:22 2016 +0100
Merge pull request #40 from ilario/sandbox/conditional-dependency
Change to conditional dependencies for lime-proto-x batctl if
prints just
eth0-2_118: active
while I expected to see also the wireless interfaces here
This was a bug should be already fixed in latest commit
# ps |grep bmx
3509 root 1168 S grep bmx
so no bmx daemon is running?
Strange, can you reproduce with latest commit?
Which lime-build commands are you using to compile your image? >> sniffing on the ethernet ports of the router
I can see batman packets
>> coming out just on the WAN port and not on the LAN ports.
>
> more investigation needed
This is normal as lime-proto-batadv now use ethernet interface for mesh only
if a specific section (like the wan) enables batman-adv on that interface
otherwise it doesn't use it as it seems batman-adv randomly get confused if
used on interfaces used in lan too
Ah, I forgot to specify that the dhcp client was
working just on the
WAN port, so the WAN port was correctly identified by
lime-hwd-openwrt-wan
Perfect!
>> I compiled the image using the new
recommended system: lime-build
>> then I noticed that some of the packets that was suggested to deselect
>> by the old traditional compilation guide are indeed selected here:
>> CONFIG_PACKAGE_odhcpd=y
>> CONFIG_PACKAGE_firewall=y
>
> more investigation needed
Can you open a iussue on github about this so we don't forget to talk about
this before the new release ?
Personally i am almost sure that odhcpd should be taken out while firewall we
should discuss it although libremesh can work both with or without filrewall
package (so i would remove that for simplicity and image size)
Cheers!
Please take advantage of being all the devs in the
same place for
discussing this, once decided to keep or not these packages the
problem is super easy to solve adding a line here I think:
https://github.com/libre-mesh/lime-build/blob/develop/configs/ath-lime-basic
Thank you :D
Ilario
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev(a)lists.libre-mesh.org
https://lists.libre-mesh.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Keep up
with the good work :D
Ilario
Cheers and thanks for feedback!
2908
days inactive
2909
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gio -
Ilario -
Ilario Gelmetti