Great Gio, thanks again for your work.
About the bmx6/olsr integration, it is true that we have to think a bit
more about it. Maybe an option to enable/disable the default route
management for the protocols would be required.
Now that I'm in Leipzig with Daniel maybe we can try the bmx6/olsr
integration in a real device and also in a real network. Probably we
will find out the solution in real time. The first problem we have is a
kind of fight for the rp_filter control.
Cheers.
On 15/07/16 23:24, Gio wrote:
Hi!
I have been reviewing the branch olsr_integration started by Pau. I have
changed a few stuff for more consistence, in particular we already had the
convention that vlanid=0 mean no vlan and createVlanInterface already take
care of this (still testing it on a real device is TODO)
moreover the way it was implemented named args worked only in specific
interface configuration while now it works also in the general network section
I also removed the extraArgs param because args is already a table
(associative array) so it already support string index (we were already doing
something similar for interface flags)
All modifications should works but are not tested on a real device as i don't
have one under my hands right now, so i haven't merged it
Still it is not clear to me how bmx and olsr can run at same time without
causing strange behaviors in general cases, but it is not a problem for me ;)
While i perfectly see the usefulnes of supporting more routing protocols also
without using vlan
Thanks for the idea of moving also protocols to named arguments and to start
coding it!
Cheers!