The most easily available routers in Ecuador with detachable antennas are the TP-Link 841HP v5 and 941HP(UN) v2. Any chance of compatibility with LibreMesh?
https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WR841HP_v5.x
CPU: MediaTek MT7628N (575 MHz)
FLA1: 8 MiB (GigaDevice GD25Q64B)
RAM1: 64 MiB (Winbond W9751G6KB-25)
Stock bootloader: U-Boot
Stock FW OS: Linux
I haven't found technical specs for the 941HP(UN) v2.
The most easily available routers in Ecuador with detachable antennas are the TP-Link 841HP v5 and 941HP(UN) v2. Any chance of compatibility with LibreMesh?
https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WR841HP_v5.x
CPU: MediaTek MT7628N (575 MHz)
FLA1: 8 MiB (GigaDevice GD25Q64B)
RAM1: 64 MiB (Winbond W9751G6KB-25)
Stock bootloader: U-Boot
Stock FW OS: Linux
I haven't found technical specs for the 941HP(UN) v2.
What happens if I put a larger antenna (say a 9 dBi omni) on a small, low power device (such as a gl.inet AR300M router that comes with 2dBi antennas)?
Hi folks,
We're considering using LibreRouters at an event with over ten thousand people. Some networks would be set up and remain constant for two weeks, and others would be set up for an hour or two, or might even be mobile (sort of like the Pirate Box / Library Box). Some would connect with the internet, others would not.
Any estimate of how many WiFi clients each LibreRouter can handle simultaneously? (I remember hearing a WDR3500 can handle about 20 WiFi clients).
Any ideas about making the network more resistant to interference and malicious attempts to take it down?
Any other suggestions? Different hardware?
Cheers,
Pato
Hi,
In the network of buenos aires cauca Colombia, we decided to implement some
equipment at 5GHZ and we have some problems:
I have been configuring a 5Ghz network with LibreMesh, I have several
Ubiquiti Nano M, NanoBeam and NanoLocoM nodes.
It turns out that one of the NanoBean devices connects to 2 nodes with good
signal quality, between 90/90 but when I try to access this node it is too
slow and if I ping the device the answer is with DUP:
PING 10.17.177.80 (10.17.177.80) 56 (84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 675 ms
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 675 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 1163 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 1171 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 1679 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.17.177.80: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 129 time = 1684 ms (DUP!)
Any ideas to try to solve it?
I am using LibreMESH with bmx6 and the mesh mode is 802.11s.
Any help or idea I would greatly appreciate.
Greetings.
Fernando Castro T
Hello,
If I'm not mistaken, it seems like our 'chef' is doing something wrong.
-----------------------------------
Updated list of available packages in
/home/aparcar/worker/imagebuilder/lime/testing/ar71xx/generic/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/root-ar71xx/../../../../../../../../../../../home/aparcar/worker/imagebuilder/lime/testing/ar71xx/generic/dl/lm_profiles
Collected errors:
* satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies
for lime-full:
* libremap-agent
* opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package lime-full.
make[2]: *** [package_install] Error 255
make[1]: *** [_call_manifest] Error 2
make: *** [manifest] Error 2
-----------------------------------
I went to https://chef.libremesh.org/
and tried to cook with options
distribution - libremesh
version - testing
router - tp-link wdr4300 v1
flavor - full libremesh
profile - libremesh default