lime

lime-users@lists.libremesh.org

493 discussions

by fred

Hello, I live in Toulouse I am planning to drive to Spain & Barcelona first october week. Is there a LibreMesh community members I could give a visit to? I would like to see a practical Lime deployment to be able to teach howto to our local free provider Tetaneutral. Noone there is still using mesh but point to point connections. 1Love Fred Renault

6 years, 2 months

[lime-users] Configuring lan and wan in /etc/config/lime on espressobin with marvel Topaz switch

by David Johnson

I managed to get libremesh branch openwrt-18.06 running on an espressobin https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/globalscale/globalscale_espressobin_v5_0_1 It uses the following switch (Marvell Topaz 88E6341). The espressobin exposes 3 ports (2 for lan and 1 for wan) http://wiki.espressobin.net/tiki-index.php?page=Topaz+Switch Which has been supported using MDIO since 18.06 https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_admin_vlan?dataflt%5B0%5D=switch_%3DMarve… But I'm struggling with the right /etc/config/lime for this specific switch When the system boots it has the following devices off of eth0 lan0 lan1 wan config lime 'system' option domain 'lan' option hostname 'TEST-%M4%M5%M6' config lime 'network' list protocols 'ieee80211s' list protocols 'lan' list protocols 'anygw' list protocols 'bmx6:13' list resolvers '4.2.2.2' list resolvers '141.1.1.1' list resolvers '2001:470:20::2' option primary_interface 'eth0' option main_ipv4_address '10.%N1.0.0/16' option main_ipv6_address '2a00:1508:0a%N1:%N200::/64' option anygw_mac 'aa:aa:aa:%N1:%N2:aa' option anygw_dhcp_start '2' option anygw_dhcp_limit '0' option bmx6_over_batman 'false' option bmx6_mtu '1500' option bmx6_pref_gw 'none' option use_odhcpd 'false' option bmx6_publish_ownip 'false' option bmx6_wifi_rate_max '54000000' config lime 'wifi' list modes 'ap' list modes 'apname' list modes 'ieee80211s' option ieee80211s_mesh_id 'LiMe' option adhoc_mcast_rate_5ghz '6000' option ap_ssid 'test' option distance '1000' option ieee80211s_mesh_fwding '0' option apname_ssid 'test/%H' option adhoc_bssid 'ca:fe:00:c0:ff:ee' option htmode_5ghz 'HT20' option channel_2ghz '11' option adhoc_mcast_rate_2ghz '24000' option channel_5ghz '48' option adhoc_ssid 'LiMe' option distance_2ghz '100' option distance_5ghz '1000' config net 'lm_hwd_openwrt_wan' option autogenerated 'false' list protocols 'ieee80211s' list protocols 'anygw' list protocols 'bmx6:0' list protocols 'wan' option linux_name 'wan

6 years, 3 months

[lime-users] [spam] resolution #libremesh-dev

by guifipedro

[opportunity now to play/listen to John Coltrane - Resolution] Hi! We had heavy problems in IRC channels due to a large spam attacks affecting several IRC networks. I feel this is getting stable, I mean, I'm happy with the last change I did (but perhaps you not and you want to discuss): /mode #libremesh-dev +be $~a *!*(a)gateway/shell/matrix.org/* This means that by default BANS users UNIDENTIFIED in Freenode EXCEPT matrix users. I documented it here: https://gitlab.com/guifi-exo/wiki/blob/master/howto/matrix-riot.md#configur…

6 years, 3 months

[lime-users] TP-Link Archer C20 v4 and TL-WR840Nv5(ES) - any experience?

by Patricio Gibbs

On Monday night through Wednesday we have a training that includes setting up a 400 meter link (near Puyo, Ecuador, UTC-5). We have purchased a TP-Link Archer C20 v4. We plan to connect it via Nanostation2 and NanoLoco2 with a WR840Nv5(ES) that belongs to a small ISP (why this arrangement? combo of cheapest new and used hardware that I thought would work). The 840N only has 4MB RAM, which I understand is not really recommended for LibreMesh. Neither of the routers are on the list of devices at http://chef.libremesh.org/ for LibreMesh, but they are on the list for OpenWrt. The most similar device by name on the LibreMesh list is the Archer C20i. If we can LibreMesh-ify the ISPs 840N router in a way that it can easily be returned to factory firmware, maybe we will do that. If we can LibreMesh-ify the Archer C20 without a high probability of bricking it, we will do that (we don't have money in the budget for a replacement this week). I can use lime-sdk cooker instead of Chef -- I have done this before to test a new translation file. Suggestions on how to proceed? Here's the C20v4 data: https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_archer_c20_ac750_v4 Supported Current Rel: snapshot Unsupported Functions: WiFi 5GHz Target: ramips Subtarget: mt76x8 Package architecture: mipsel_24kc Bootloader: U-Boot CPU: MediaTek MT7628AN 8 MB flash, 64 MB RAM Compare to C20i: https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/tp-link/tp-link_archer_c20i_ac750_v1 Supported Current Rel: 17.01.4 Unsupported Functions: WiFi 5GHz Target: ramips Subtarget: mt7620 Package architecture: mipsel_24kc Bootloader: U-Boot CPU: MediaTek MT7620A 8 MB flash, 64 MB RAM TL-WR840N v5 (ES) -- belongs to the ISP https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WR840N_v5 CPU1: MediaTek MT7628N (575 MHz) FLA1: 4 MiB (GigaDevice GD25Q32B) RAM1: 64 MiB (ESMT M14D5121632A) ~ Pato

6 years, 3 months

[lime-users] MicroTik recommendations

by Patricio Gibbs

Who has used LibreMesh on MicroTik devices? Are they easier to flash than Ubiquiti? (Ubq require downgrading and then flashing, and finding the correct files can take time). I'm interested in common devices, not the newest devices, and also interested in returning them to stock firmware after testing LibreMesh on them. Why? A friend who runs a small family ISP wants to test LibreMesh, and mostly uses MicroTik, with some NanoStation M2. Also, if this works well, I might shift some planned installations from Ubiquiti to MikroTik. Common devices in Ecuador include: - Sxt 5ndr2 Lite - Sxt-2 - Lhg 5 https://listado.mercadolibre.com.ec/mikrotik ~ Pato

6 years, 3 months

[lime-users] Smart Queue Management (SQM) - Minimizing Bufferbloat

by Luandro Viera

We all share two 1Mb satellite connections here in our mesh. But since mine is always more hops aways from most of the users they tend to go to the single 1Mb gateway, so we're starting to experience really slow, some times, unusable internet. We're already using a captive-portal system to block unwanted users, so now all I can think of is of controlling the bandwidth traffic. So I came across the sqm <https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/traffic-shaping/sqm> package. Seems to be easy way to controlling the traffic. Anyone have any experience with using this package? Any other solutions, like using squid? Ideally we'd want to throttle videos, Bittorrent and other bandwidth suckers.

6 years, 4 months

[lime-users] LiMe device compatibility and Chef

by Patricio Gibbs

Continuing my quest to categorize devices based on their LibreMesh compatibility, since the LibreRouter hasn't arrived yet and won't solve all needs.... 1) great, (e.g. WDR3500) 2) okay, but fixed antennas 3) some functions not working, (e.g. Archer C20v4) 4) emergencies only (ones that have 4 or 2 MB flash) 5) incompatible (e.g. 841HP) In Chef, when I type "ubiq" in the router model field, I get a list of Ubiquiti devices supposedly compatible with the latest release of LibreMesh. How is this list generated? Is it reviewed by a human? Here are examples of why I ask: it says Nano-M and Nano M XW: are these NanoStation or NanoBeam? It says Loco XW but the OpenWrt ToH says that the latest supported release for the Loco is 10.03.1, https://openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2....? Flashing LibreMesh onto NanoStation and TP-Link CPE devices could make some networks much easier to maintain.... If it actually works. This continues a conversation from last year about improving our documentation, such as maintaining a LibreMesh wiki. ~ Patricio

6 years, 4 months

Re: [lime-users] chef builder issues missing package

by Patricio Gibbs

It's there a way to build LibreMesh images based on 17.06 right now via lime-sdk? El 23 de agosto de 2018 1:53:53 GMT-05:00, Paul Spooren <mail(a)aparcar.org> escribió: >Are you sure the message is not: > >Unknown package in request: zz-libremesh-default > >At least that's what I get when following your configuration. > >The libremesh-default network profile is only usable and relevant for >an (hopefully soon) upcoming change in libremesh which will improve the >overall configuration possibilities. > >BestOn Aug 22, 2018 4:58 PM, William Fleurant via lime-users ><lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> re: https://chef.libremesh.org/ >> >> When cooking LiMe firmware with network-profile set to >libremesh-default: >> Unknown package in request: lime-full >> >> -w >> >> >> >> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >> >_______________________________________________ >lime-users mailing list >lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

6 years, 4 months

Re: [lime-users] chef builder issues missing package

by Fabien Gagné

I had the same issue not long ago. Which network profile should we use for a basic configuration? Le jeu. 23 août 2018 02 h 54, Paul Spooren <mail(a)aparcar.org> a écrit : > Are you sure the message is not: > > Unknown package in request: zz-libremesh-default > > At least that's what I get when following your configuration. > > The libremesh-default network profile is only usable and relevant for an > (hopefully soon) upcoming change in libremesh which will improve the > overall configuration possibilities. > > BestOn Aug 22, 2018 4:58 PM, William Fleurant via lime-users < > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > re: https://chef.libremesh.org/ > > > > When cooking LiMe firmware with network-profile set to libremesh-default: > > Unknown package in request: lime-full > > > > -w > > > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > _______________________________________________ > lime-users mailing list > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

6 years, 4 months

[lime-users] Community network

by Roland Wells

Hello all. I'm working with a community initiative in Nigeria who would like to implement a community-wide wifi network. I'm looking at LibreMesh as a possible solution Nodes would be solar powered, and would share connection to public internet through only a couple gateways. I'm interested in connecting with anyone on the list who has implemented LibreMesh in a similar way, and I'm also looking for recommendations on hardware considerations. I'm thinking a dual radio device with the 5ghz radio dedicated to the mesh backhaul, and the 2.4ghz dedicated to end users. Also, I'm located in Verona, Italy and could easily meet-up with any active users nearby. With best regards. Roland Wells Founder http://hellohub.org | http://kruufm.com

6 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
50
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

lime