Hola! Esta es mi primera participación en la lista. No puedo escribir en
inglés pero si puedo leerlo, al menos los términos informáticos.
Trataré de usar la terminología apropiada, pero si hago mal uso de algún
término les agradezco la corrección, y aprendo un poco más.
Es la primera vez que uso LiMe me falta mucho para aprender de redes.
Estoy tratando de conectar LiMe con la red wifi de mi vecino para salir
a internet desde su conexión. Él no tiene LiMe. En el techo de su casa
pondría un access point HP V-M200 (es lo que único que tengo hasta que
llegue LibreRouter :)
He logrado establecer el enlace de radio entre ellos y obtener
respuestas de pings desde ambos lados. Desde LiMe hacia afuera, solo
puede lograrlo desde Network/Diagnostics... y no tengo internet :-(
En algún momento pude acceder a un servidor web que tengo en una de las
subredes, pero no salir a internet. Creería que el problema es el nuevo
gateway para internet que no se conoce ¿O tendría que definir reglas de
ruteo para salidas a internet?
¿Cómo le cuento a LiMe que la salida a internet no es por la interfaz
WAN del eth1? Quiero que salga por WWAN de Client "wifiVecino"?
¿Qué debo estudiar ahora? =-O
Muchas gracias por la ayuda.
Seba
---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
i took my day off to test libremesh with 11s.
i could say: 11s works with lede 17.01.2 based cooker-builds ootb. BUT:
i need to trigger the strange networking restart fix as in
https://github.com/libremesh/network-profiles/blob/master/openNET.io/1144-W…
(iirc this is related to the "Internet traffic not going through" thread
on the list).
anybody has any hint how to debug, what is needed to prevent using this
imho dirty fix? i have no idea where this bug comes from. with the
default lime-profile with adhoc-mode everything is fine, as soon as i
use the lime-11s profile i need to trigger a network restart on the
non-gateway nodes to get routing to 0.0.0.0/0 - internal routing inside
10.13.0.0/16 works as intended. the inet4-bmx6-tunnel exists. the nodes
could see each other via batman-adv and bmx6.
for the sake of completeness:
i've built my images with:
adhoc-mode:
./cooker -c ar71xx/generic --profile=tl-wr1043nd-v2 --flavor=lime_default
11s-mode:
./cooker -c ar71xx/generic --profile=tl-wr1043nd-v2
--flavor=lime_default --community=libremesh/11s
greetings from jena/germany,
micha
Hi
I have a strange issue where sometimes, seemingly after a new gateway appears on the network, other routers that were offline during the change, cannot route internet traffic correctly even though BMX tunnels shows everything as being perfect, including the inet4 line with the exit node saying internet.
Steps to reproduce:
1] set up a node with internet access [A]
2] connect client via ethernet to a known to work second [and non-exit] node [B] which is wirelessly meshing with [A]
3] ping internet from client [it works]
4] shut down [A]
5] shut down [B]
6] turn on a new node [C] with the exact same config as [A] and connect it to the same WAN
7] turn [B] back on
Everything in luci will appear perfectly, you’ll be able to ipv6 ping any node, but any internet bound traffic will time out, even from the luci diagnostics page [not a client routes issue].
After rebooting [B], everything works consistently across reboots.
I’ve yet to try with standard 1607, but I’m using an extremely lightly modified config. I’ll do that tomorrow anyway.
Is there a way to restart batman to see if that’s the issue? [can’t find its entry in “startup”] Is there a way to restart some other service to figure out what the issue is? What should I look for in logs?
Is there a general way to force-reset something if a node sees a mesh exit-node but somehow isn’t able to route traffic to it?
Thank you
Nk
Hi,
I have been seeing messages on different topics mentioning the next
release, I have not followed them carefully.
I think I once listened or read the next release won't be compatible
with the current one (maybe because of 802.11s??). Is that correct?
Cheers!
devices: ape522ii, picostation m2, wr841 v8
running lime-config after flashing:
root@LiMe-0952a5:~# lime-config
Clearing wireless config...
Clearing network config...
Disabling odhcpd
Cleaning dnsmasq
Disabling 6relayd...
WARNING: Attempt to access undeclared default for: network.anygw_mac
stack traceback:
/usr/lib/lua/lime/config.lua:24: in function 'get'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/proto/anygw.lua:12: in function 'anygw_mac'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/proto/anygw.lua:21: in function 'configure'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230: in function
</usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230>
[C]: in function 'xpcall'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230: in function
</usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:210>
[C]: in function 'xpcall'
/usr/bin/lime-config:45: in function 'main'
/usr/bin/lime-config:65: in main chunk
[C]: ?
WARNING: Attempt to access undeclared default for: network.bmx6_pref_gw
stack traceback:
/usr/lib/lua/lime/config.lua:24: in function 'get'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/proto/bmx6.lua:85: in function 'configure'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230: in function
</usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230>
[C]: in function 'xpcall'
/usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:230: in function
</usr/lib/lua/lime/network.lua:210>
[C]: in function 'xpcall'
/usr/bin/lime-config:45: in function 'main'
/usr/bin/lime-config:65: in main chunk
[C]: ?
Configuring system...
Let uhttpd listen on IPv4/IPv6
Hi,
I can change the hostname in some routers. I do it by editing the
hostname at /etc/config/system and then I run the lime-config command.
That works fine in some TP-Link routers I tried, but it does not seem
work on two Nanostation M5 routers I have. They do not keep the manually
configured name, but the autoconfigured by LibreMesh. Why? Any suggestion?
Crappy workarounds are welcome too!
Good meshing,
Please do not feel pushed, I am just happily asking things here.
Is there any estimate on when there will be an official captive portal
solution?
In the meantime, is there anything that more or less works with Libremesh?
Sorry to come back again with this topic, we had many emails around
saying different things and I got confused.
Cheers
Trying to use COOKER i been getting errors with not being to install
lime-full or other lime "collections"
It seems to be a problem with old BUILDROOM method to
The first time i did it I was able to compile using BUILD ROOT
When i tried to re-produce the steps collections area was completly
blank, this is where lime-full was located
has something broken in the feeds?
